Cargando…
The need for increased pragmatism in cardiovascular clinical trials
The majority of cardiovascular randomized controlled trials (RCTs) test interventions in selected patient populations under explicitly protocol-defined settings. Although these ‘explanatory’ trial designs optimize conditions to test the efficacy and safety of an intervention, they limit the generali...
Autores principales: | Usman, Muhammad Shariq, Van Spall, Harriette G. C., Greene, Stephen J., Pandey, Ambarish, McGuire, Darren K., Ali, Ziad A., Mentz, Robert J., Fonarow, Gregg C., Spertus, John A., Anker, Stefan D., Butler, Javed, James, Stefan K., Khan, Muhammad Shahzeb |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9112643/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35581337 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41569-022-00705-w |
Ejemplares similares
-
Robustness of outcomes in trials evaluating sodium–glucose co‐transporter 2 inhibitors for heart failure
por: Usman, Muhammad Shariq, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Renin–angiotensin blockade in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
por: Khan, Muhammad Shahzeb, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Frailty and heart failure: State‐of‐the‐art review
por: Talha, Khawaja M., et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Efficacy and safety of SGLT2 inhibitors in heart failure: systematic review and meta‐analysis
por: Butler, Javed, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Application of the Reverse Fragility Index to Statistically Nonsignificant Randomized Clinical Trial Results
por: Khan, Muhammad Shahzeb, et al.
Publicado: (2020)