Cargando…

Spatial priorities for freshwater biodiversity conservation in light of catchment protection and connectivity in Europe

Freshwater ecosystems host disproportionately high numbers of species relative to their surface area yet are poorly protected globally. We used data on the distribution of 1631 species of aquatic plant, mollusc, odonate and fish in 18,816 river and lake catchments in Europe to establish spatial cons...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Szabolcs, Márton, Kapusi, Felícia, Carrizo, Savrina, Markovic, Danijela, Freyhof, Jörg, Cid, Núria, Cardoso, Ana Cristina, Scholz, Mathias, Kasperidus, Hans D., Darwall, William R. T., Lengyel, Szabolcs
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9113586/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35580083
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267801
_version_ 1784709612626247680
author Szabolcs, Márton
Kapusi, Felícia
Carrizo, Savrina
Markovic, Danijela
Freyhof, Jörg
Cid, Núria
Cardoso, Ana Cristina
Scholz, Mathias
Kasperidus, Hans D.
Darwall, William R. T.
Lengyel, Szabolcs
author_facet Szabolcs, Márton
Kapusi, Felícia
Carrizo, Savrina
Markovic, Danijela
Freyhof, Jörg
Cid, Núria
Cardoso, Ana Cristina
Scholz, Mathias
Kasperidus, Hans D.
Darwall, William R. T.
Lengyel, Szabolcs
author_sort Szabolcs, Márton
collection PubMed
description Freshwater ecosystems host disproportionately high numbers of species relative to their surface area yet are poorly protected globally. We used data on the distribution of 1631 species of aquatic plant, mollusc, odonate and fish in 18,816 river and lake catchments in Europe to establish spatial conservation priorities based on the occurrence of threatened, range-restricted and endemic species using the Marxan systematic conservation planning tool. We found that priorities were highest for rivers and ancient lakes in S Europe, large rivers and lakes in E and N Europe, smaller lakes in NW Europe and karst/limestone areas in the Balkans, S France and central Europe. The a priori inclusion of well-protected catchments resulted in geographically more balanced priorities and better coverage of threatened (critically endangered, endangered and vulnerable) species. The a priori exclusion of well-protected catchments showed that priority areas that need further conservation interventions are in S and E Europe. We developed three ways to evaluate the correspondence between conservation priority and current protection by assessing whether a cathment has more (or less) priority given its protection level relative to all other catchments. Each method found that priority relative to protection was high in S and E Europe and generally low in NW Europe. The inclusion of hydrological connectivity had little influence on these patterns but decreased the coverage of threatened species, indicating a trade-off between connectivity and conservation of threatened species. Our results suggest that catchments in S and E Europe need urgent conservation attention (protected areas, restoration, management, species protection) in the face of imminent threats such as river regulation, dam construction, hydropower development and climate change. Our study presents continental-scale conservation priorities for freshwater ecosystems in ecologically meaningful planning units and will thus be important in freshwater biodiversity conservation policy and practice, and water management in Europe.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9113586
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91135862022-05-18 Spatial priorities for freshwater biodiversity conservation in light of catchment protection and connectivity in Europe Szabolcs, Márton Kapusi, Felícia Carrizo, Savrina Markovic, Danijela Freyhof, Jörg Cid, Núria Cardoso, Ana Cristina Scholz, Mathias Kasperidus, Hans D. Darwall, William R. T. Lengyel, Szabolcs PLoS One Research Article Freshwater ecosystems host disproportionately high numbers of species relative to their surface area yet are poorly protected globally. We used data on the distribution of 1631 species of aquatic plant, mollusc, odonate and fish in 18,816 river and lake catchments in Europe to establish spatial conservation priorities based on the occurrence of threatened, range-restricted and endemic species using the Marxan systematic conservation planning tool. We found that priorities were highest for rivers and ancient lakes in S Europe, large rivers and lakes in E and N Europe, smaller lakes in NW Europe and karst/limestone areas in the Balkans, S France and central Europe. The a priori inclusion of well-protected catchments resulted in geographically more balanced priorities and better coverage of threatened (critically endangered, endangered and vulnerable) species. The a priori exclusion of well-protected catchments showed that priority areas that need further conservation interventions are in S and E Europe. We developed three ways to evaluate the correspondence between conservation priority and current protection by assessing whether a cathment has more (or less) priority given its protection level relative to all other catchments. Each method found that priority relative to protection was high in S and E Europe and generally low in NW Europe. The inclusion of hydrological connectivity had little influence on these patterns but decreased the coverage of threatened species, indicating a trade-off between connectivity and conservation of threatened species. Our results suggest that catchments in S and E Europe need urgent conservation attention (protected areas, restoration, management, species protection) in the face of imminent threats such as river regulation, dam construction, hydropower development and climate change. Our study presents continental-scale conservation priorities for freshwater ecosystems in ecologically meaningful planning units and will thus be important in freshwater biodiversity conservation policy and practice, and water management in Europe. Public Library of Science 2022-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9113586/ /pubmed/35580083 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267801 Text en © 2022 Szabolcs et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Szabolcs, Márton
Kapusi, Felícia
Carrizo, Savrina
Markovic, Danijela
Freyhof, Jörg
Cid, Núria
Cardoso, Ana Cristina
Scholz, Mathias
Kasperidus, Hans D.
Darwall, William R. T.
Lengyel, Szabolcs
Spatial priorities for freshwater biodiversity conservation in light of catchment protection and connectivity in Europe
title Spatial priorities for freshwater biodiversity conservation in light of catchment protection and connectivity in Europe
title_full Spatial priorities for freshwater biodiversity conservation in light of catchment protection and connectivity in Europe
title_fullStr Spatial priorities for freshwater biodiversity conservation in light of catchment protection and connectivity in Europe
title_full_unstemmed Spatial priorities for freshwater biodiversity conservation in light of catchment protection and connectivity in Europe
title_short Spatial priorities for freshwater biodiversity conservation in light of catchment protection and connectivity in Europe
title_sort spatial priorities for freshwater biodiversity conservation in light of catchment protection and connectivity in europe
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9113586/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35580083
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267801
work_keys_str_mv AT szabolcsmarton spatialprioritiesforfreshwaterbiodiversityconservationinlightofcatchmentprotectionandconnectivityineurope
AT kapusifelicia spatialprioritiesforfreshwaterbiodiversityconservationinlightofcatchmentprotectionandconnectivityineurope
AT carrizosavrina spatialprioritiesforfreshwaterbiodiversityconservationinlightofcatchmentprotectionandconnectivityineurope
AT markovicdanijela spatialprioritiesforfreshwaterbiodiversityconservationinlightofcatchmentprotectionandconnectivityineurope
AT freyhofjorg spatialprioritiesforfreshwaterbiodiversityconservationinlightofcatchmentprotectionandconnectivityineurope
AT cidnuria spatialprioritiesforfreshwaterbiodiversityconservationinlightofcatchmentprotectionandconnectivityineurope
AT cardosoanacristina spatialprioritiesforfreshwaterbiodiversityconservationinlightofcatchmentprotectionandconnectivityineurope
AT scholzmathias spatialprioritiesforfreshwaterbiodiversityconservationinlightofcatchmentprotectionandconnectivityineurope
AT kasperidushansd spatialprioritiesforfreshwaterbiodiversityconservationinlightofcatchmentprotectionandconnectivityineurope
AT darwallwilliamrt spatialprioritiesforfreshwaterbiodiversityconservationinlightofcatchmentprotectionandconnectivityineurope
AT lengyelszabolcs spatialprioritiesforfreshwaterbiodiversityconservationinlightofcatchmentprotectionandconnectivityineurope