Cargando…

A decision-theoretic approach to Bayesian clinical trial design and evaluation of robustness to prior-data conflict

Bayesian clinical trials allow taking advantage of relevant external information through the elicitation of prior distributions, which influence Bayesian posterior parameter estimates and test decisions. However, incorporation of historical information can have harmful consequences on the trial’s fr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Calderazzo, Silvia, Wiesenfarth, Manuel, Kopp-Schneider, Annette
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9118338/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32735010
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/kxaa027
_version_ 1784710473032138752
author Calderazzo, Silvia
Wiesenfarth, Manuel
Kopp-Schneider, Annette
author_facet Calderazzo, Silvia
Wiesenfarth, Manuel
Kopp-Schneider, Annette
author_sort Calderazzo, Silvia
collection PubMed
description Bayesian clinical trials allow taking advantage of relevant external information through the elicitation of prior distributions, which influence Bayesian posterior parameter estimates and test decisions. However, incorporation of historical information can have harmful consequences on the trial’s frequentist (conditional) operating characteristics in case of inconsistency between prior information and the newly collected data. A compromise between meaningful incorporation of historical information and strict control of frequentist error rates is therefore often sought. Our aim is thus to review and investigate the rationale and consequences of different approaches to relaxing strict frequentist control of error rates from a Bayesian decision-theoretic viewpoint. In particular, we define an integrated risk which incorporates losses arising from testing, estimation, and sampling. A weighted combination of the integrated risk addends arising from testing and estimation allows moving smoothly between these two targets. Furthermore, we explore different possible elicitations of the test error costs, leading to test decisions based either on posterior probabilities, or solely on Bayes factors. Sensitivity analyses are performed following the convention which makes a distinction between the prior of the data-generating process, and the analysis prior adopted to fit the data. Simulation in the case of normal and binomial outcomes and an application to a one-arm proof-of-concept trial, exemplify how such analysis can be conducted to explore sensitivity of the integrated risk, the operating characteristics, and the optimal sample size, to prior-data conflict. Robust analysis prior specifications, which gradually discount potentially conflicting prior information, are also included for comparison. Guidance with respect to cost elicitation, particularly in the context of a Phase II proof-of-concept trial, is provided.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9118338
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91183382022-05-20 A decision-theoretic approach to Bayesian clinical trial design and evaluation of robustness to prior-data conflict Calderazzo, Silvia Wiesenfarth, Manuel Kopp-Schneider, Annette Biostatistics Articles Bayesian clinical trials allow taking advantage of relevant external information through the elicitation of prior distributions, which influence Bayesian posterior parameter estimates and test decisions. However, incorporation of historical information can have harmful consequences on the trial’s frequentist (conditional) operating characteristics in case of inconsistency between prior information and the newly collected data. A compromise between meaningful incorporation of historical information and strict control of frequentist error rates is therefore often sought. Our aim is thus to review and investigate the rationale and consequences of different approaches to relaxing strict frequentist control of error rates from a Bayesian decision-theoretic viewpoint. In particular, we define an integrated risk which incorporates losses arising from testing, estimation, and sampling. A weighted combination of the integrated risk addends arising from testing and estimation allows moving smoothly between these two targets. Furthermore, we explore different possible elicitations of the test error costs, leading to test decisions based either on posterior probabilities, or solely on Bayes factors. Sensitivity analyses are performed following the convention which makes a distinction between the prior of the data-generating process, and the analysis prior adopted to fit the data. Simulation in the case of normal and binomial outcomes and an application to a one-arm proof-of-concept trial, exemplify how such analysis can be conducted to explore sensitivity of the integrated risk, the operating characteristics, and the optimal sample size, to prior-data conflict. Robust analysis prior specifications, which gradually discount potentially conflicting prior information, are also included for comparison. Guidance with respect to cost elicitation, particularly in the context of a Phase II proof-of-concept trial, is provided. Oxford University Press 2020-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9118338/ /pubmed/32735010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/kxaa027 Text en © The Author 2020. Published by Oxford University Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Articles
Calderazzo, Silvia
Wiesenfarth, Manuel
Kopp-Schneider, Annette
A decision-theoretic approach to Bayesian clinical trial design and evaluation of robustness to prior-data conflict
title A decision-theoretic approach to Bayesian clinical trial design and evaluation of robustness to prior-data conflict
title_full A decision-theoretic approach to Bayesian clinical trial design and evaluation of robustness to prior-data conflict
title_fullStr A decision-theoretic approach to Bayesian clinical trial design and evaluation of robustness to prior-data conflict
title_full_unstemmed A decision-theoretic approach to Bayesian clinical trial design and evaluation of robustness to prior-data conflict
title_short A decision-theoretic approach to Bayesian clinical trial design and evaluation of robustness to prior-data conflict
title_sort decision-theoretic approach to bayesian clinical trial design and evaluation of robustness to prior-data conflict
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9118338/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32735010
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/kxaa027
work_keys_str_mv AT calderazzosilvia adecisiontheoreticapproachtobayesianclinicaltrialdesignandevaluationofrobustnesstopriordataconflict
AT wiesenfarthmanuel adecisiontheoreticapproachtobayesianclinicaltrialdesignandevaluationofrobustnesstopriordataconflict
AT koppschneiderannette adecisiontheoreticapproachtobayesianclinicaltrialdesignandevaluationofrobustnesstopriordataconflict
AT calderazzosilvia decisiontheoreticapproachtobayesianclinicaltrialdesignandevaluationofrobustnesstopriordataconflict
AT wiesenfarthmanuel decisiontheoreticapproachtobayesianclinicaltrialdesignandevaluationofrobustnesstopriordataconflict
AT koppschneiderannette decisiontheoreticapproachtobayesianclinicaltrialdesignandevaluationofrobustnesstopriordataconflict