Cargando…
A decision-theoretic approach to Bayesian clinical trial design and evaluation of robustness to prior-data conflict
Bayesian clinical trials allow taking advantage of relevant external information through the elicitation of prior distributions, which influence Bayesian posterior parameter estimates and test decisions. However, incorporation of historical information can have harmful consequences on the trial’s fr...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9118338/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32735010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/kxaa027 |
_version_ | 1784710473032138752 |
---|---|
author | Calderazzo, Silvia Wiesenfarth, Manuel Kopp-Schneider, Annette |
author_facet | Calderazzo, Silvia Wiesenfarth, Manuel Kopp-Schneider, Annette |
author_sort | Calderazzo, Silvia |
collection | PubMed |
description | Bayesian clinical trials allow taking advantage of relevant external information through the elicitation of prior distributions, which influence Bayesian posterior parameter estimates and test decisions. However, incorporation of historical information can have harmful consequences on the trial’s frequentist (conditional) operating characteristics in case of inconsistency between prior information and the newly collected data. A compromise between meaningful incorporation of historical information and strict control of frequentist error rates is therefore often sought. Our aim is thus to review and investigate the rationale and consequences of different approaches to relaxing strict frequentist control of error rates from a Bayesian decision-theoretic viewpoint. In particular, we define an integrated risk which incorporates losses arising from testing, estimation, and sampling. A weighted combination of the integrated risk addends arising from testing and estimation allows moving smoothly between these two targets. Furthermore, we explore different possible elicitations of the test error costs, leading to test decisions based either on posterior probabilities, or solely on Bayes factors. Sensitivity analyses are performed following the convention which makes a distinction between the prior of the data-generating process, and the analysis prior adopted to fit the data. Simulation in the case of normal and binomial outcomes and an application to a one-arm proof-of-concept trial, exemplify how such analysis can be conducted to explore sensitivity of the integrated risk, the operating characteristics, and the optimal sample size, to prior-data conflict. Robust analysis prior specifications, which gradually discount potentially conflicting prior information, are also included for comparison. Guidance with respect to cost elicitation, particularly in the context of a Phase II proof-of-concept trial, is provided. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9118338 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91183382022-05-20 A decision-theoretic approach to Bayesian clinical trial design and evaluation of robustness to prior-data conflict Calderazzo, Silvia Wiesenfarth, Manuel Kopp-Schneider, Annette Biostatistics Articles Bayesian clinical trials allow taking advantage of relevant external information through the elicitation of prior distributions, which influence Bayesian posterior parameter estimates and test decisions. However, incorporation of historical information can have harmful consequences on the trial’s frequentist (conditional) operating characteristics in case of inconsistency between prior information and the newly collected data. A compromise between meaningful incorporation of historical information and strict control of frequentist error rates is therefore often sought. Our aim is thus to review and investigate the rationale and consequences of different approaches to relaxing strict frequentist control of error rates from a Bayesian decision-theoretic viewpoint. In particular, we define an integrated risk which incorporates losses arising from testing, estimation, and sampling. A weighted combination of the integrated risk addends arising from testing and estimation allows moving smoothly between these two targets. Furthermore, we explore different possible elicitations of the test error costs, leading to test decisions based either on posterior probabilities, or solely on Bayes factors. Sensitivity analyses are performed following the convention which makes a distinction between the prior of the data-generating process, and the analysis prior adopted to fit the data. Simulation in the case of normal and binomial outcomes and an application to a one-arm proof-of-concept trial, exemplify how such analysis can be conducted to explore sensitivity of the integrated risk, the operating characteristics, and the optimal sample size, to prior-data conflict. Robust analysis prior specifications, which gradually discount potentially conflicting prior information, are also included for comparison. Guidance with respect to cost elicitation, particularly in the context of a Phase II proof-of-concept trial, is provided. Oxford University Press 2020-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9118338/ /pubmed/32735010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/kxaa027 Text en © The Author 2020. Published by Oxford University Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Articles Calderazzo, Silvia Wiesenfarth, Manuel Kopp-Schneider, Annette A decision-theoretic approach to Bayesian clinical trial design and evaluation of robustness to prior-data conflict |
title | A decision-theoretic approach to Bayesian clinical trial design and evaluation of robustness to prior-data conflict |
title_full | A decision-theoretic approach to Bayesian clinical trial design and evaluation of robustness to prior-data conflict |
title_fullStr | A decision-theoretic approach to Bayesian clinical trial design and evaluation of robustness to prior-data conflict |
title_full_unstemmed | A decision-theoretic approach to Bayesian clinical trial design and evaluation of robustness to prior-data conflict |
title_short | A decision-theoretic approach to Bayesian clinical trial design and evaluation of robustness to prior-data conflict |
title_sort | decision-theoretic approach to bayesian clinical trial design and evaluation of robustness to prior-data conflict |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9118338/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32735010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/kxaa027 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT calderazzosilvia adecisiontheoreticapproachtobayesianclinicaltrialdesignandevaluationofrobustnesstopriordataconflict AT wiesenfarthmanuel adecisiontheoreticapproachtobayesianclinicaltrialdesignandevaluationofrobustnesstopriordataconflict AT koppschneiderannette adecisiontheoreticapproachtobayesianclinicaltrialdesignandevaluationofrobustnesstopriordataconflict AT calderazzosilvia decisiontheoreticapproachtobayesianclinicaltrialdesignandevaluationofrobustnesstopriordataconflict AT wiesenfarthmanuel decisiontheoreticapproachtobayesianclinicaltrialdesignandevaluationofrobustnesstopriordataconflict AT koppschneiderannette decisiontheoreticapproachtobayesianclinicaltrialdesignandevaluationofrobustnesstopriordataconflict |