Cargando…

Proarrhythmic risk assessment of drugs by dV (m) /dt shapes using the convolutional neural network

Comprehensive in vitro Proarrhythmia Assay (CiPA) projects for assessing proarrhythmic drugs suggested a logistic regression model using qNet as the Torsades de Pointes (TdP) risk assessment biomarker, obtained from in silico simulation. However, using a single in silico feature, such as qNet, canno...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jeong, Da Un, Yoo, Yedam, Marcellinus, Aroli, Kim, Ki‐Suk, Lim, Ki Moo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9124356/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35579100
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/psp4.12803
Descripción
Sumario:Comprehensive in vitro Proarrhythmia Assay (CiPA) projects for assessing proarrhythmic drugs suggested a logistic regression model using qNet as the Torsades de Pointes (TdP) risk assessment biomarker, obtained from in silico simulation. However, using a single in silico feature, such as qNet, cannot reflect whole characteristics related to TdP in the entire action potential (AP) shape. Thus, this study proposed a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) model using differential action potential shapes to classify three proarrhythmic risk levels: high, intermediate, and low, considering both characteristics related to TdP not only in the depolarization phase but also the repolarization phase of AP shape. We performed an in silico simulation and got AP shapes with drug effects using half‐maximal inhibitory concentration and Hill coefficients of 28 drugs released by CiPA groups. Then, we trained the deep CNN model with the differential AP shapes of 12 drugs and tested it with those of 16 drugs. Our model had a better performance for classifying the proarrhythmic risk of drugs than the traditional logistic regression model using qNet. The classification accuracy was 98% for high‐risk level drugs, 94% for intermediate‐risk level drugs, and 89% for low‐risk level drugs.