Cargando…
The Effectiveness and Student Perceptions of Peer-Conducted Team-Based Learning Compared to Faculty-Led Teaching in Undergraduate Teaching
BACKGROUND: Today’s professionals need to be capable of independent information retrieval, teamwork, and lifelong learning. To meet these demands, more active learning methods are needed in university teaching. Team-based learning (TBL) is a learner-centered method which enables activation of studen...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9124697/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35615463 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S358360 |
_version_ | 1784711784810151936 |
---|---|
author | Huilaja, Laura Bur, Eeva Jokelainen, Jari Sinikumpu, Suvi-Päivikki Kulmala, Petri |
author_facet | Huilaja, Laura Bur, Eeva Jokelainen, Jari Sinikumpu, Suvi-Päivikki Kulmala, Petri |
author_sort | Huilaja, Laura |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Today’s professionals need to be capable of independent information retrieval, teamwork, and lifelong learning. To meet these demands, more active learning methods are needed in university teaching. Team-based learning (TBL) is a learner-centered method which enables activation of students in large classes. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare a method combining peer teaching and TBL (peer-conducted TBL; pTBL) with faculty-led seminar teaching. More precisely, students’ opinions about teaching methods and immediate and long-term learning outcomes were aimed to compare. METHODS: A faculty-led design was compared to a pTBL design when teaching pediatric and dermatological allergy in a seminar setting for 5(th) year medical students. For that purpose, students were randomly split into two learning groups. In a faculty-led seminar (n = 44 students) the instructor first lectured on each subject; then, named students from each group were asked to present clinical cases given to them beforehand and them raising questions were answered. In a pTBL group (n = 50) student’s prior knowledge was first tested. Then, randomly selected, pre-prepared students took a tutors role in a seminar and presented clinical case to be solved in groups by all students. Students’ performance was equally tested after both sessions and 5–6 months afterwards. Students’ opinions were asked by an electronic survey. RESULTS: In this study, pTBL was significantly preferred over faculty-led learning (mean grade 8.5 vs 6.5). Those participating in pTBL group studied pre-learning material more actively than those in faculty-led group. However, there was no difference in learning outcomes (immediate or long term) between the groups. CONCLUSION: Students prefer teaching method in which they are self in active role. Combining TBL and peer teaching may further increase the accumulation of non-academic skills like expertise and proficiency. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9124697 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91246972022-05-24 The Effectiveness and Student Perceptions of Peer-Conducted Team-Based Learning Compared to Faculty-Led Teaching in Undergraduate Teaching Huilaja, Laura Bur, Eeva Jokelainen, Jari Sinikumpu, Suvi-Päivikki Kulmala, Petri Adv Med Educ Pract Original Research BACKGROUND: Today’s professionals need to be capable of independent information retrieval, teamwork, and lifelong learning. To meet these demands, more active learning methods are needed in university teaching. Team-based learning (TBL) is a learner-centered method which enables activation of students in large classes. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare a method combining peer teaching and TBL (peer-conducted TBL; pTBL) with faculty-led seminar teaching. More precisely, students’ opinions about teaching methods and immediate and long-term learning outcomes were aimed to compare. METHODS: A faculty-led design was compared to a pTBL design when teaching pediatric and dermatological allergy in a seminar setting for 5(th) year medical students. For that purpose, students were randomly split into two learning groups. In a faculty-led seminar (n = 44 students) the instructor first lectured on each subject; then, named students from each group were asked to present clinical cases given to them beforehand and them raising questions were answered. In a pTBL group (n = 50) student’s prior knowledge was first tested. Then, randomly selected, pre-prepared students took a tutors role in a seminar and presented clinical case to be solved in groups by all students. Students’ performance was equally tested after both sessions and 5–6 months afterwards. Students’ opinions were asked by an electronic survey. RESULTS: In this study, pTBL was significantly preferred over faculty-led learning (mean grade 8.5 vs 6.5). Those participating in pTBL group studied pre-learning material more actively than those in faculty-led group. However, there was no difference in learning outcomes (immediate or long term) between the groups. CONCLUSION: Students prefer teaching method in which they are self in active role. Combining TBL and peer teaching may further increase the accumulation of non-academic skills like expertise and proficiency. Dove 2022-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9124697/ /pubmed/35615463 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S358360 Text en © 2022 Huilaja et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Huilaja, Laura Bur, Eeva Jokelainen, Jari Sinikumpu, Suvi-Päivikki Kulmala, Petri The Effectiveness and Student Perceptions of Peer-Conducted Team-Based Learning Compared to Faculty-Led Teaching in Undergraduate Teaching |
title | The Effectiveness and Student Perceptions of Peer-Conducted Team-Based Learning Compared to Faculty-Led Teaching in Undergraduate Teaching |
title_full | The Effectiveness and Student Perceptions of Peer-Conducted Team-Based Learning Compared to Faculty-Led Teaching in Undergraduate Teaching |
title_fullStr | The Effectiveness and Student Perceptions of Peer-Conducted Team-Based Learning Compared to Faculty-Led Teaching in Undergraduate Teaching |
title_full_unstemmed | The Effectiveness and Student Perceptions of Peer-Conducted Team-Based Learning Compared to Faculty-Led Teaching in Undergraduate Teaching |
title_short | The Effectiveness and Student Perceptions of Peer-Conducted Team-Based Learning Compared to Faculty-Led Teaching in Undergraduate Teaching |
title_sort | effectiveness and student perceptions of peer-conducted team-based learning compared to faculty-led teaching in undergraduate teaching |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9124697/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35615463 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S358360 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huilajalaura theeffectivenessandstudentperceptionsofpeerconductedteambasedlearningcomparedtofacultyledteachinginundergraduateteaching AT bureeva theeffectivenessandstudentperceptionsofpeerconductedteambasedlearningcomparedtofacultyledteachinginundergraduateteaching AT jokelainenjari theeffectivenessandstudentperceptionsofpeerconductedteambasedlearningcomparedtofacultyledteachinginundergraduateteaching AT sinikumpusuvipaivikki theeffectivenessandstudentperceptionsofpeerconductedteambasedlearningcomparedtofacultyledteachinginundergraduateteaching AT kulmalapetri theeffectivenessandstudentperceptionsofpeerconductedteambasedlearningcomparedtofacultyledteachinginundergraduateteaching AT huilajalaura effectivenessandstudentperceptionsofpeerconductedteambasedlearningcomparedtofacultyledteachinginundergraduateteaching AT bureeva effectivenessandstudentperceptionsofpeerconductedteambasedlearningcomparedtofacultyledteachinginundergraduateteaching AT jokelainenjari effectivenessandstudentperceptionsofpeerconductedteambasedlearningcomparedtofacultyledteachinginundergraduateteaching AT sinikumpusuvipaivikki effectivenessandstudentperceptionsofpeerconductedteambasedlearningcomparedtofacultyledteachinginundergraduateteaching AT kulmalapetri effectivenessandstudentperceptionsofpeerconductedteambasedlearningcomparedtofacultyledteachinginundergraduateteaching |