Cargando…

The Impact of RIPK1 Kinase Inhibition on Atherogenesis: A Genetic and a Pharmacological Approach

RIPK1 (receptor-interacting serine/threonine-protein kinase 1) enzymatic activity drives both apoptosis and necroptosis, a regulated form of necrosis. Because necroptosis is involved in necrotic core development in atherosclerotic plaques, we investigated the effects of a RIPK1(S25D/S25D) mutation,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Puylaert, Pauline, Coornaert, Isabelle, Neutel, Cédric H. G., Dondelinger, Yves, Delanghe, Tom, Bertrand, Mathieu J. M., Guns, Pieter-Jan, De Meyer, Guido R. Y., Martinet, Wim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9138372/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35625752
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10051016
Descripción
Sumario:RIPK1 (receptor-interacting serine/threonine-protein kinase 1) enzymatic activity drives both apoptosis and necroptosis, a regulated form of necrosis. Because necroptosis is involved in necrotic core development in atherosclerotic plaques, we investigated the effects of a RIPK1(S25D/S25D) mutation, which prevents activation of RIPK1 kinase, on atherogenesis in ApoE(−/−) mice. After 16 weeks of western-type diet (WD), atherosclerotic plaques from ApoE(−/−) RIPK1(S25D/S25D) mice were significantly larger compared to ApoE(−/−) RIPK1(+/+) mice (167 ± 34 vs. 78 ± 18 × 10(3) µm(2), p = 0.01). Cell numbers (350 ± 34 vs. 154 ± 33 nuclei) and deposition of glycosaminoglycans (Alcian blue: 31 ± 6 vs. 14 ± 4%, p = 0.023) were increased in plaques from ApoE(−/−) RIPK1(S25D/S25D) mice while macrophage content (Mac3: 2.3 ± 0.4 vs. 9.8 ± 2.4%, p = 0.012) was decreased. Plaque apoptosis was not different between both groups. In contrast, pharmacological inhibition of RIPK1 kinase with GSK’547 (10 mg/kg BW/day) in ApoE(−/−) Fbn1(C1039G+/−) mice, a model of advanced atherosclerosis, did not alter plaque size after 20 weeks WD, but induced apoptosis (TUNEL: 136 ± 20 vs. 62 ± 9 cells/mm(2), p = 0.004). In conclusion, inhibition of RIPK1 kinase activity accelerated plaque progression in ApoE(−/−) RIPK1(S25D/S25D) mice and induced apoptosis in GSK’547-treated ApoE(−/−) Fbn1(C1039G+/−) mice. Thus, without directly comparing the genetic and pharmacological studies, it can be concluded that targeting RIPK1 kinase activity does not limit atherogenesis.