Cargando…
Perspectives, benefits and challenges of a live OSCE during the COVID-19 pandemic in a cross-sectional study
OBJECTIVES: Restrictions due to the COVID-19 pandemic mandated fundamental changes to student evaluations, including the administration of the observed structured clinical examination (OSCE). This study aims to conduct an in-person OSCE to verify students’ practical skills under necessary infection...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9170794/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36691253 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058845 |
_version_ | 1784721512812511232 |
---|---|
author | Loda, Teresa Erschens, Rebecca Sarah Nevins, Andrew B Zipfel, Stephan Herrmann-Werner, Anne |
author_facet | Loda, Teresa Erschens, Rebecca Sarah Nevins, Andrew B Zipfel, Stephan Herrmann-Werner, Anne |
author_sort | Loda, Teresa |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Restrictions due to the COVID-19 pandemic mandated fundamental changes to student evaluations, including the administration of the observed structured clinical examination (OSCE). This study aims to conduct an in-person OSCE to verify students’ practical skills under necessary infection control practices and the impact of face masks on student–patient interactions. DESIGN: Cross-sectional design. SETTING: The OSCE at Medical School of Tuebingen takes place in October 2020. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 149 students (third year of study) completed the survey (RR=80.1%). It was their first OSCE. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome measure was how this type of OSCE was evaluated by participating students in regard to preparation, content and difficulty as well as in real life. Secondary outcome measures were how the implemented hygiene actions influenced the OSCE, including the interaction and communication between students and standardised patients (SPs). Items were rated on a 6-point Likert scale (1=completely to 6=not at all). Means, SDs, frequencies and percentages were calculated. RESULTS: 149 students, 32 SPs and 59 examiners participated. The students rated the OSCE with 2.37 (±0.52) for preparation and 2.07 (±0.32) for content. They perceived the interaction to be significantly disrupted by the use of face masks (3.03±1.54) (p<0.001) compared with the SPs (3.84±1.44) and the examiners (4.14±1.55). In general, the three groups considered the use of face masking the OSCE to be helpful (1.60±1.15). CONCLUSIONS: An in-person OSCE, even in the midst of a global pandemic, is feasible and acceptable to both students and faculty. When compared the students’ results to previous students’ results who completed the OSCE before the pandemic, the results indicated that students felt less prepared than under non-pandemic circumstances; however, their performances on this OSCE were not lower. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9170794 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91707942022-06-10 Perspectives, benefits and challenges of a live OSCE during the COVID-19 pandemic in a cross-sectional study Loda, Teresa Erschens, Rebecca Sarah Nevins, Andrew B Zipfel, Stephan Herrmann-Werner, Anne BMJ Open Medical Education and Training OBJECTIVES: Restrictions due to the COVID-19 pandemic mandated fundamental changes to student evaluations, including the administration of the observed structured clinical examination (OSCE). This study aims to conduct an in-person OSCE to verify students’ practical skills under necessary infection control practices and the impact of face masks on student–patient interactions. DESIGN: Cross-sectional design. SETTING: The OSCE at Medical School of Tuebingen takes place in October 2020. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 149 students (third year of study) completed the survey (RR=80.1%). It was their first OSCE. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome measure was how this type of OSCE was evaluated by participating students in regard to preparation, content and difficulty as well as in real life. Secondary outcome measures were how the implemented hygiene actions influenced the OSCE, including the interaction and communication between students and standardised patients (SPs). Items were rated on a 6-point Likert scale (1=completely to 6=not at all). Means, SDs, frequencies and percentages were calculated. RESULTS: 149 students, 32 SPs and 59 examiners participated. The students rated the OSCE with 2.37 (±0.52) for preparation and 2.07 (±0.32) for content. They perceived the interaction to be significantly disrupted by the use of face masks (3.03±1.54) (p<0.001) compared with the SPs (3.84±1.44) and the examiners (4.14±1.55). In general, the three groups considered the use of face masking the OSCE to be helpful (1.60±1.15). CONCLUSIONS: An in-person OSCE, even in the midst of a global pandemic, is feasible and acceptable to both students and faculty. When compared the students’ results to previous students’ results who completed the OSCE before the pandemic, the results indicated that students felt less prepared than under non-pandemic circumstances; however, their performances on this OSCE were not lower. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9170794/ /pubmed/36691253 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058845 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Medical Education and Training Loda, Teresa Erschens, Rebecca Sarah Nevins, Andrew B Zipfel, Stephan Herrmann-Werner, Anne Perspectives, benefits and challenges of a live OSCE during the COVID-19 pandemic in a cross-sectional study |
title | Perspectives, benefits and challenges of a live OSCE during the COVID-19 pandemic in a cross-sectional study |
title_full | Perspectives, benefits and challenges of a live OSCE during the COVID-19 pandemic in a cross-sectional study |
title_fullStr | Perspectives, benefits and challenges of a live OSCE during the COVID-19 pandemic in a cross-sectional study |
title_full_unstemmed | Perspectives, benefits and challenges of a live OSCE during the COVID-19 pandemic in a cross-sectional study |
title_short | Perspectives, benefits and challenges of a live OSCE during the COVID-19 pandemic in a cross-sectional study |
title_sort | perspectives, benefits and challenges of a live osce during the covid-19 pandemic in a cross-sectional study |
topic | Medical Education and Training |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9170794/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36691253 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058845 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lodateresa perspectivesbenefitsandchallengesofaliveosceduringthecovid19pandemicinacrosssectionalstudy AT erschensrebeccasarah perspectivesbenefitsandchallengesofaliveosceduringthecovid19pandemicinacrosssectionalstudy AT nevinsandrewb perspectivesbenefitsandchallengesofaliveosceduringthecovid19pandemicinacrosssectionalstudy AT zipfelstephan perspectivesbenefitsandchallengesofaliveosceduringthecovid19pandemicinacrosssectionalstudy AT herrmannwerneranne perspectivesbenefitsandchallengesofaliveosceduringthecovid19pandemicinacrosssectionalstudy |