Cargando…

Ki-67 assessment of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: Systematic review and meta-analysis of manual vs. digital pathology scoring

Ki-67 assessment is a key step in the diagnosis of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) from all anatomic locations. Several challenges exist related to quantifying the Ki-67 proliferation index due to lack of method standardization and inter-reader variability. The application of digital pathology coupl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Luchini, Claudio, Pantanowitz, Liron, Adsay, Volkan, Asa, Sylvia L., Antonini, Pietro, Girolami, Ilaria, Veronese, Nicola, Nottegar, Alessia, Cingarlini, Sara, Landoni, Luca, Brosens, Lodewijk A., Verschuur, Anna V., Mattiolo, Paola, Pea, Antonio, Mafficini, Andrea, Milella, Michele, Niazi, Muhammad K., Gurcan, Metin N., Eccher, Albino, Cree, Ian A., Scarpa, Aldo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group US 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9174054/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35249100
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41379-022-01055-1
_version_ 1784722155113545728
author Luchini, Claudio
Pantanowitz, Liron
Adsay, Volkan
Asa, Sylvia L.
Antonini, Pietro
Girolami, Ilaria
Veronese, Nicola
Nottegar, Alessia
Cingarlini, Sara
Landoni, Luca
Brosens, Lodewijk A.
Verschuur, Anna V.
Mattiolo, Paola
Pea, Antonio
Mafficini, Andrea
Milella, Michele
Niazi, Muhammad K.
Gurcan, Metin N.
Eccher, Albino
Cree, Ian A.
Scarpa, Aldo
author_facet Luchini, Claudio
Pantanowitz, Liron
Adsay, Volkan
Asa, Sylvia L.
Antonini, Pietro
Girolami, Ilaria
Veronese, Nicola
Nottegar, Alessia
Cingarlini, Sara
Landoni, Luca
Brosens, Lodewijk A.
Verschuur, Anna V.
Mattiolo, Paola
Pea, Antonio
Mafficini, Andrea
Milella, Michele
Niazi, Muhammad K.
Gurcan, Metin N.
Eccher, Albino
Cree, Ian A.
Scarpa, Aldo
author_sort Luchini, Claudio
collection PubMed
description Ki-67 assessment is a key step in the diagnosis of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) from all anatomic locations. Several challenges exist related to quantifying the Ki-67 proliferation index due to lack of method standardization and inter-reader variability. The application of digital pathology coupled with machine learning has been shown to be highly accurate and reproducible for the evaluation of Ki-67 in NENs. We systematically reviewed all published studies on the subject of Ki-67 assessment in pancreatic NENs (PanNENs) employing digital image analysis (DIA). The most common advantages of DIA were improvement in the standardization and reliability of Ki-67 evaluation, as well as its speed and practicality, compared to the current gold standard approach of manual counts from captured images, which is cumbersome and time consuming. The main limitations were attributed to higher costs, lack of widespread availability (as of yet), operator qualification and training issues (if it is not done by pathologists), and most importantly, the drawback of image algorithms counting contaminating non-neoplastic cells and other signals like hemosiderin. However, solutions are rapidly developing for all of these challenging issues. A comparative meta-analysis for DIA versus manual counting shows very high concordance (global coefficient of concordance: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.83–0.98) between these two modalities. These findings support the widespread adoption of validated DIA methods for Ki-67 assessment in PanNENs, provided that measures are in place to ensure counting of only tumor cells either by software modifications or education of non-pathologist operators, as well as selection of standard regions of interest for analysis. NENs, being cellular and monotonous neoplasms, are naturally more amenable to Ki-67 assessment. However, lessons of this review may be applicable to other neoplasms where proliferation activity has become an integral part of theranostic evaluation including breast, brain, and hematolymphoid neoplasms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9174054
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91740542022-06-09 Ki-67 assessment of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: Systematic review and meta-analysis of manual vs. digital pathology scoring Luchini, Claudio Pantanowitz, Liron Adsay, Volkan Asa, Sylvia L. Antonini, Pietro Girolami, Ilaria Veronese, Nicola Nottegar, Alessia Cingarlini, Sara Landoni, Luca Brosens, Lodewijk A. Verschuur, Anna V. Mattiolo, Paola Pea, Antonio Mafficini, Andrea Milella, Michele Niazi, Muhammad K. Gurcan, Metin N. Eccher, Albino Cree, Ian A. Scarpa, Aldo Mod Pathol Review Article Ki-67 assessment is a key step in the diagnosis of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) from all anatomic locations. Several challenges exist related to quantifying the Ki-67 proliferation index due to lack of method standardization and inter-reader variability. The application of digital pathology coupled with machine learning has been shown to be highly accurate and reproducible for the evaluation of Ki-67 in NENs. We systematically reviewed all published studies on the subject of Ki-67 assessment in pancreatic NENs (PanNENs) employing digital image analysis (DIA). The most common advantages of DIA were improvement in the standardization and reliability of Ki-67 evaluation, as well as its speed and practicality, compared to the current gold standard approach of manual counts from captured images, which is cumbersome and time consuming. The main limitations were attributed to higher costs, lack of widespread availability (as of yet), operator qualification and training issues (if it is not done by pathologists), and most importantly, the drawback of image algorithms counting contaminating non-neoplastic cells and other signals like hemosiderin. However, solutions are rapidly developing for all of these challenging issues. A comparative meta-analysis for DIA versus manual counting shows very high concordance (global coefficient of concordance: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.83–0.98) between these two modalities. These findings support the widespread adoption of validated DIA methods for Ki-67 assessment in PanNENs, provided that measures are in place to ensure counting of only tumor cells either by software modifications or education of non-pathologist operators, as well as selection of standard regions of interest for analysis. NENs, being cellular and monotonous neoplasms, are naturally more amenable to Ki-67 assessment. However, lessons of this review may be applicable to other neoplasms where proliferation activity has become an integral part of theranostic evaluation including breast, brain, and hematolymphoid neoplasms. Nature Publishing Group US 2022-03-05 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9174054/ /pubmed/35249100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41379-022-01055-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review Article
Luchini, Claudio
Pantanowitz, Liron
Adsay, Volkan
Asa, Sylvia L.
Antonini, Pietro
Girolami, Ilaria
Veronese, Nicola
Nottegar, Alessia
Cingarlini, Sara
Landoni, Luca
Brosens, Lodewijk A.
Verschuur, Anna V.
Mattiolo, Paola
Pea, Antonio
Mafficini, Andrea
Milella, Michele
Niazi, Muhammad K.
Gurcan, Metin N.
Eccher, Albino
Cree, Ian A.
Scarpa, Aldo
Ki-67 assessment of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: Systematic review and meta-analysis of manual vs. digital pathology scoring
title Ki-67 assessment of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: Systematic review and meta-analysis of manual vs. digital pathology scoring
title_full Ki-67 assessment of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: Systematic review and meta-analysis of manual vs. digital pathology scoring
title_fullStr Ki-67 assessment of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: Systematic review and meta-analysis of manual vs. digital pathology scoring
title_full_unstemmed Ki-67 assessment of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: Systematic review and meta-analysis of manual vs. digital pathology scoring
title_short Ki-67 assessment of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: Systematic review and meta-analysis of manual vs. digital pathology scoring
title_sort ki-67 assessment of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: systematic review and meta-analysis of manual vs. digital pathology scoring
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9174054/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35249100
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41379-022-01055-1
work_keys_str_mv AT luchiniclaudio ki67assessmentofpancreaticneuroendocrineneoplasmssystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmanualvsdigitalpathologyscoring
AT pantanowitzliron ki67assessmentofpancreaticneuroendocrineneoplasmssystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmanualvsdigitalpathologyscoring
AT adsayvolkan ki67assessmentofpancreaticneuroendocrineneoplasmssystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmanualvsdigitalpathologyscoring
AT asasylvial ki67assessmentofpancreaticneuroendocrineneoplasmssystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmanualvsdigitalpathologyscoring
AT antoninipietro ki67assessmentofpancreaticneuroendocrineneoplasmssystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmanualvsdigitalpathologyscoring
AT girolamiilaria ki67assessmentofpancreaticneuroendocrineneoplasmssystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmanualvsdigitalpathologyscoring
AT veronesenicola ki67assessmentofpancreaticneuroendocrineneoplasmssystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmanualvsdigitalpathologyscoring
AT nottegaralessia ki67assessmentofpancreaticneuroendocrineneoplasmssystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmanualvsdigitalpathologyscoring
AT cingarlinisara ki67assessmentofpancreaticneuroendocrineneoplasmssystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmanualvsdigitalpathologyscoring
AT landoniluca ki67assessmentofpancreaticneuroendocrineneoplasmssystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmanualvsdigitalpathologyscoring
AT brosenslodewijka ki67assessmentofpancreaticneuroendocrineneoplasmssystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmanualvsdigitalpathologyscoring
AT verschuurannav ki67assessmentofpancreaticneuroendocrineneoplasmssystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmanualvsdigitalpathologyscoring
AT mattiolopaola ki67assessmentofpancreaticneuroendocrineneoplasmssystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmanualvsdigitalpathologyscoring
AT peaantonio ki67assessmentofpancreaticneuroendocrineneoplasmssystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmanualvsdigitalpathologyscoring
AT mafficiniandrea ki67assessmentofpancreaticneuroendocrineneoplasmssystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmanualvsdigitalpathologyscoring
AT milellamichele ki67assessmentofpancreaticneuroendocrineneoplasmssystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmanualvsdigitalpathologyscoring
AT niazimuhammadk ki67assessmentofpancreaticneuroendocrineneoplasmssystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmanualvsdigitalpathologyscoring
AT gurcanmetinn ki67assessmentofpancreaticneuroendocrineneoplasmssystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmanualvsdigitalpathologyscoring
AT eccheralbino ki67assessmentofpancreaticneuroendocrineneoplasmssystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmanualvsdigitalpathologyscoring
AT creeiana ki67assessmentofpancreaticneuroendocrineneoplasmssystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmanualvsdigitalpathologyscoring
AT scarpaaldo ki67assessmentofpancreaticneuroendocrineneoplasmssystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmanualvsdigitalpathologyscoring