Cargando…

Comparisons of Cooking, Dietary, and Food Safety Characteristics of Food Secure and Food Insecure Sophomores at a University in Appalachia

INTRODUCTION: Food insecurity means lacking access to adequate, nutritious, and safe food. Collegiate food insecurity rates at ten Appalachian campuses range from 22.4% to 51.8% and have been associated with unfavorable health and academic outcomes. PURPOSE: This study compared cooking, dietary, and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boone, Hannah E., Gutschall, Melissa D., Farris, Alisha R., Fasczewski, Kimberly S., Holbert, Donald, McArthur, Laura H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The University of Kentucky 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9183792/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35769825
http://dx.doi.org/10.13023/jah.0304.08
_version_ 1784724368721444864
author Boone, Hannah E.
Gutschall, Melissa D.
Farris, Alisha R.
Fasczewski, Kimberly S.
Holbert, Donald
McArthur, Laura H.
author_facet Boone, Hannah E.
Gutschall, Melissa D.
Farris, Alisha R.
Fasczewski, Kimberly S.
Holbert, Donald
McArthur, Laura H.
author_sort Boone, Hannah E.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Food insecurity means lacking access to adequate, nutritious, and safe food. Collegiate food insecurity rates at ten Appalachian campuses range from 22.4% to 51.8% and have been associated with unfavorable health and academic outcomes. PURPOSE: This study compared cooking, dietary, and food safety characteristics of food secure (FS) and food insecure (FI) sophomores at a university in Appalachia in the context of the USDA definition of food security. METHODS: Data were collected using an online questionnaire. Descriptive and inferential procedures compared FS and FI sophomores (p < 0.05). RESULTS: Participants (n = 226) were 65.0% females, 76.1% whites, and 46% FI. About 40% of on-campus and 50% of off-campus residents were FI, and 70% of FI students reported needing help accessing food. Cooking was undertaken “less often” by 61.5% of FS and 55.8% of FI sophomores. Mean cooking self-efficacy scores for FS and FI students were 44.9, vs 43.4, (p > 0.05) out of 52 points. Grains were consumed most often by 40% of FS and FI students and vegetables were consumed least often by 70% of both groups. Mean food safety test scores for FS and FI students were 6.2 1.60 vs 6.6 1.52 (p > 0.05) out of 11 points. Requested educational activities included making a budget and planning balanced meals. IMPLICATIONS: The high rate of food insecurity reflects an ongoing need among sophomores for campus and community food assistance and for educational activities that teach purchasing and preparation of affordable, healthy and safe foods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9183792
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The University of Kentucky
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91837922022-06-28 Comparisons of Cooking, Dietary, and Food Safety Characteristics of Food Secure and Food Insecure Sophomores at a University in Appalachia Boone, Hannah E. Gutschall, Melissa D. Farris, Alisha R. Fasczewski, Kimberly S. Holbert, Donald McArthur, Laura H. J Appalach Health Research Articles INTRODUCTION: Food insecurity means lacking access to adequate, nutritious, and safe food. Collegiate food insecurity rates at ten Appalachian campuses range from 22.4% to 51.8% and have been associated with unfavorable health and academic outcomes. PURPOSE: This study compared cooking, dietary, and food safety characteristics of food secure (FS) and food insecure (FI) sophomores at a university in Appalachia in the context of the USDA definition of food security. METHODS: Data were collected using an online questionnaire. Descriptive and inferential procedures compared FS and FI sophomores (p < 0.05). RESULTS: Participants (n = 226) were 65.0% females, 76.1% whites, and 46% FI. About 40% of on-campus and 50% of off-campus residents were FI, and 70% of FI students reported needing help accessing food. Cooking was undertaken “less often” by 61.5% of FS and 55.8% of FI sophomores. Mean cooking self-efficacy scores for FS and FI students were 44.9, vs 43.4, (p > 0.05) out of 52 points. Grains were consumed most often by 40% of FS and FI students and vegetables were consumed least often by 70% of both groups. Mean food safety test scores for FS and FI students were 6.2 1.60 vs 6.6 1.52 (p > 0.05) out of 11 points. Requested educational activities included making a budget and planning balanced meals. IMPLICATIONS: The high rate of food insecurity reflects an ongoing need among sophomores for campus and community food assistance and for educational activities that teach purchasing and preparation of affordable, healthy and safe foods. The University of Kentucky 2021-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9183792/ /pubmed/35769825 http://dx.doi.org/10.13023/jah.0304.08 Text en Copyright © 2021 Hannah Boone, Melissa D. Gutschall, Alisha Farris, Kimberly Fasczewski, Don Holbert, and Laura McArthur https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research Articles
Boone, Hannah E.
Gutschall, Melissa D.
Farris, Alisha R.
Fasczewski, Kimberly S.
Holbert, Donald
McArthur, Laura H.
Comparisons of Cooking, Dietary, and Food Safety Characteristics of Food Secure and Food Insecure Sophomores at a University in Appalachia
title Comparisons of Cooking, Dietary, and Food Safety Characteristics of Food Secure and Food Insecure Sophomores at a University in Appalachia
title_full Comparisons of Cooking, Dietary, and Food Safety Characteristics of Food Secure and Food Insecure Sophomores at a University in Appalachia
title_fullStr Comparisons of Cooking, Dietary, and Food Safety Characteristics of Food Secure and Food Insecure Sophomores at a University in Appalachia
title_full_unstemmed Comparisons of Cooking, Dietary, and Food Safety Characteristics of Food Secure and Food Insecure Sophomores at a University in Appalachia
title_short Comparisons of Cooking, Dietary, and Food Safety Characteristics of Food Secure and Food Insecure Sophomores at a University in Appalachia
title_sort comparisons of cooking, dietary, and food safety characteristics of food secure and food insecure sophomores at a university in appalachia
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9183792/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35769825
http://dx.doi.org/10.13023/jah.0304.08
work_keys_str_mv AT boonehannahe comparisonsofcookingdietaryandfoodsafetycharacteristicsoffoodsecureandfoodinsecuresophomoresatauniversityinappalachia
AT gutschallmelissad comparisonsofcookingdietaryandfoodsafetycharacteristicsoffoodsecureandfoodinsecuresophomoresatauniversityinappalachia
AT farrisalishar comparisonsofcookingdietaryandfoodsafetycharacteristicsoffoodsecureandfoodinsecuresophomoresatauniversityinappalachia
AT fasczewskikimberlys comparisonsofcookingdietaryandfoodsafetycharacteristicsoffoodsecureandfoodinsecuresophomoresatauniversityinappalachia
AT holbertdonald comparisonsofcookingdietaryandfoodsafetycharacteristicsoffoodsecureandfoodinsecuresophomoresatauniversityinappalachia
AT mcarthurlaurah comparisonsofcookingdietaryandfoodsafetycharacteristicsoffoodsecureandfoodinsecuresophomoresatauniversityinappalachia