Cargando…

The implementation of interprofessional education: a scoping review

INTRODUCTION: Implementation of interprofessional education (IPE) is recognised as challenging, and well-designed programs can have differing levels of success depending on implementation quality. The aim of this review was to summarise the evidence for implementation of IPE, and identify challenges...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bogossian, Fiona, New, Karen, George, Kendall, Barr, Nigel, Dodd, Natalie, Hamilton, Anita L., Nash, Gregory, Masters, Nicole, Pelly, Fiona, Reid, Carol, Shakhovskoy, Rebekah, Taylor, Jane
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9186481/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35689133
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10459-022-10128-4
_version_ 1784724943852797952
author Bogossian, Fiona
New, Karen
George, Kendall
Barr, Nigel
Dodd, Natalie
Hamilton, Anita L.
Nash, Gregory
Masters, Nicole
Pelly, Fiona
Reid, Carol
Shakhovskoy, Rebekah
Taylor, Jane
author_facet Bogossian, Fiona
New, Karen
George, Kendall
Barr, Nigel
Dodd, Natalie
Hamilton, Anita L.
Nash, Gregory
Masters, Nicole
Pelly, Fiona
Reid, Carol
Shakhovskoy, Rebekah
Taylor, Jane
author_sort Bogossian, Fiona
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Implementation of interprofessional education (IPE) is recognised as challenging, and well-designed programs can have differing levels of success depending on implementation quality. The aim of this review was to summarise the evidence for implementation of IPE, and identify challenges and key lessons to guide faculty in IPE implementation. METHODS: Five stage scoping review of methodological characteristics, implementation components, challenges and key lessons in primary studies in IPE. Thematic analysis using a framework of micro (teaching), meso (institutional), and macro (systemic) level education factors was used to synthesise challenges and key lessons. RESULTS: Twenty-seven primary studies were included in this review. Studies were predominantly descriptive in design and implementation components inconsistently reported. IPE was mostly integrated into curricula, optional, involved group learning, and used combinations of interactive and didactic approaches. Micro level implementation factors (socialisation issues, learning context, and faculty development), meso level implementation factors (leadership and resources, administrative processes), and macro level implementation factors (education system, government policies, social and cultural values) were extrapolated. Sustainability was identified as an additional factor in IPE implementation. CONCLUSION: Lack of complete detailed reporting limits evidence of IPE implementation, however, this review highlighted challenges and yielded key lessons to guide faculty in the implementation of IPE.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9186481
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91864812022-06-10 The implementation of interprofessional education: a scoping review Bogossian, Fiona New, Karen George, Kendall Barr, Nigel Dodd, Natalie Hamilton, Anita L. Nash, Gregory Masters, Nicole Pelly, Fiona Reid, Carol Shakhovskoy, Rebekah Taylor, Jane Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract Review INTRODUCTION: Implementation of interprofessional education (IPE) is recognised as challenging, and well-designed programs can have differing levels of success depending on implementation quality. The aim of this review was to summarise the evidence for implementation of IPE, and identify challenges and key lessons to guide faculty in IPE implementation. METHODS: Five stage scoping review of methodological characteristics, implementation components, challenges and key lessons in primary studies in IPE. Thematic analysis using a framework of micro (teaching), meso (institutional), and macro (systemic) level education factors was used to synthesise challenges and key lessons. RESULTS: Twenty-seven primary studies were included in this review. Studies were predominantly descriptive in design and implementation components inconsistently reported. IPE was mostly integrated into curricula, optional, involved group learning, and used combinations of interactive and didactic approaches. Micro level implementation factors (socialisation issues, learning context, and faculty development), meso level implementation factors (leadership and resources, administrative processes), and macro level implementation factors (education system, government policies, social and cultural values) were extrapolated. Sustainability was identified as an additional factor in IPE implementation. CONCLUSION: Lack of complete detailed reporting limits evidence of IPE implementation, however, this review highlighted challenges and yielded key lessons to guide faculty in the implementation of IPE. Springer Netherlands 2022-06-10 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9186481/ /pubmed/35689133 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10459-022-10128-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review
Bogossian, Fiona
New, Karen
George, Kendall
Barr, Nigel
Dodd, Natalie
Hamilton, Anita L.
Nash, Gregory
Masters, Nicole
Pelly, Fiona
Reid, Carol
Shakhovskoy, Rebekah
Taylor, Jane
The implementation of interprofessional education: a scoping review
title The implementation of interprofessional education: a scoping review
title_full The implementation of interprofessional education: a scoping review
title_fullStr The implementation of interprofessional education: a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed The implementation of interprofessional education: a scoping review
title_short The implementation of interprofessional education: a scoping review
title_sort implementation of interprofessional education: a scoping review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9186481/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35689133
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10459-022-10128-4
work_keys_str_mv AT bogossianfiona theimplementationofinterprofessionaleducationascopingreview
AT newkaren theimplementationofinterprofessionaleducationascopingreview
AT georgekendall theimplementationofinterprofessionaleducationascopingreview
AT barrnigel theimplementationofinterprofessionaleducationascopingreview
AT doddnatalie theimplementationofinterprofessionaleducationascopingreview
AT hamiltonanital theimplementationofinterprofessionaleducationascopingreview
AT nashgregory theimplementationofinterprofessionaleducationascopingreview
AT mastersnicole theimplementationofinterprofessionaleducationascopingreview
AT pellyfiona theimplementationofinterprofessionaleducationascopingreview
AT reidcarol theimplementationofinterprofessionaleducationascopingreview
AT shakhovskoyrebekah theimplementationofinterprofessionaleducationascopingreview
AT taylorjane theimplementationofinterprofessionaleducationascopingreview
AT bogossianfiona implementationofinterprofessionaleducationascopingreview
AT newkaren implementationofinterprofessionaleducationascopingreview
AT georgekendall implementationofinterprofessionaleducationascopingreview
AT barrnigel implementationofinterprofessionaleducationascopingreview
AT doddnatalie implementationofinterprofessionaleducationascopingreview
AT hamiltonanital implementationofinterprofessionaleducationascopingreview
AT nashgregory implementationofinterprofessionaleducationascopingreview
AT mastersnicole implementationofinterprofessionaleducationascopingreview
AT pellyfiona implementationofinterprofessionaleducationascopingreview
AT reidcarol implementationofinterprofessionaleducationascopingreview
AT shakhovskoyrebekah implementationofinterprofessionaleducationascopingreview
AT taylorjane implementationofinterprofessionaleducationascopingreview