Cargando…
Diet Quality Differs Significantly in Higher Plant Protein Consumers vs Higher Animal Protein Consumers
OBJECTIVES: The primary aim was to analyze differences in diet quality among higher plant protein (HPP) consumers vs higher animal protein consumers (HAP), with a secondary aim to explore intake of sodium, added sugar, saturated fat, whole and refined grains between the HPP group vs the HAP group. M...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9193722/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzac054.035 |
_version_ | 1784726534937903104 |
---|---|
author | Martin, Megan Thomas, Kate Melanson, Kathleen |
author_facet | Martin, Megan Thomas, Kate Melanson, Kathleen |
author_sort | Martin, Megan |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The primary aim was to analyze differences in diet quality among higher plant protein (HPP) consumers vs higher animal protein consumers (HAP), with a secondary aim to explore intake of sodium, added sugar, saturated fat, whole and refined grains between the HPP group vs the HAP group. METHODS: Adults consuming either plant-based or animal-based diets were recruited to complete an online cross-sectional study. The Diet History Questionnaire III, a validated food frequency questionnaire, evaluated dietary intake over the past 3 months and calculated the Healthy Eating Index (HEI 2015) total and component scores. Due to 30% of the sample miss-classifying their diet type, participants were reclassified into the HAP and HPP groups using a median split value for total daily plant (29.51 g) and animal protein (28.2 g) to form two mutually exclusive groups. The primary aim was analyzed using an ANCOVA model, controlling for age and race. The secondary aim was analyzed using MANOVA to evaluate differences in consumption of sodium, added sugar, saturated fat, whole and refined grains between the HPP and HAP groups. RESULTS: The sample (n = 89) was primarily healthy, adult (29.1 ± 11.5 years) white (85.5%), and female (77.5%). HPP participants consumed on average 58.1 ± 23.2 grams of total protein with 42.7 ± 17.5 grams coming from plant sources while HAP participants consumed on average 77.7 + 36.8 grams of total protein with 53.8 ± 31.5 grams coming from animal sources. There was a significant difference in overall diet quality between the HPP group (78.5 ± 7.6) vs the HAP group (65.7 ± 12.4) after controlling for age and race (p < 0.01). HPP participants had higher (p < 0.01) intake of whole grains (1.7 ± 0.1 oz/day) than HAP consumers (1.0 ± 0.1 oz/day). HPP participants consumed less (p < 0.01) saturated fat (13.9 ± 7.1 g/day) compared to the HAP participants (20.8 ± 10.8g/day). There were no differences between groups for intake of added sugar (p = 0.10), sodium (p = 0.59), or refined grains (p = 0.13). CONCLUSIONS: In this sample, HPP consumption was associated with higher overall diet quality than HAP, along with more whole grains and lower consumption of saturated fat. Work is needed in more diverse populations. Ultimately such research can inform nutrition education for people with HPP and HAP dietary patterns. FUNDING SOURCES: URI Enhancement of Graduate Research Awards. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9193722 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91937222022-06-14 Diet Quality Differs Significantly in Higher Plant Protein Consumers vs Higher Animal Protein Consumers Martin, Megan Thomas, Kate Melanson, Kathleen Curr Dev Nutr Dietary Patterns OBJECTIVES: The primary aim was to analyze differences in diet quality among higher plant protein (HPP) consumers vs higher animal protein consumers (HAP), with a secondary aim to explore intake of sodium, added sugar, saturated fat, whole and refined grains between the HPP group vs the HAP group. METHODS: Adults consuming either plant-based or animal-based diets were recruited to complete an online cross-sectional study. The Diet History Questionnaire III, a validated food frequency questionnaire, evaluated dietary intake over the past 3 months and calculated the Healthy Eating Index (HEI 2015) total and component scores. Due to 30% of the sample miss-classifying their diet type, participants were reclassified into the HAP and HPP groups using a median split value for total daily plant (29.51 g) and animal protein (28.2 g) to form two mutually exclusive groups. The primary aim was analyzed using an ANCOVA model, controlling for age and race. The secondary aim was analyzed using MANOVA to evaluate differences in consumption of sodium, added sugar, saturated fat, whole and refined grains between the HPP and HAP groups. RESULTS: The sample (n = 89) was primarily healthy, adult (29.1 ± 11.5 years) white (85.5%), and female (77.5%). HPP participants consumed on average 58.1 ± 23.2 grams of total protein with 42.7 ± 17.5 grams coming from plant sources while HAP participants consumed on average 77.7 + 36.8 grams of total protein with 53.8 ± 31.5 grams coming from animal sources. There was a significant difference in overall diet quality between the HPP group (78.5 ± 7.6) vs the HAP group (65.7 ± 12.4) after controlling for age and race (p < 0.01). HPP participants had higher (p < 0.01) intake of whole grains (1.7 ± 0.1 oz/day) than HAP consumers (1.0 ± 0.1 oz/day). HPP participants consumed less (p < 0.01) saturated fat (13.9 ± 7.1 g/day) compared to the HAP participants (20.8 ± 10.8g/day). There were no differences between groups for intake of added sugar (p = 0.10), sodium (p = 0.59), or refined grains (p = 0.13). CONCLUSIONS: In this sample, HPP consumption was associated with higher overall diet quality than HAP, along with more whole grains and lower consumption of saturated fat. Work is needed in more diverse populations. Ultimately such research can inform nutrition education for people with HPP and HAP dietary patterns. FUNDING SOURCES: URI Enhancement of Graduate Research Awards. Oxford University Press 2022-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9193722/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzac054.035 Text en © The Author 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The International Society for Human and Animal Mycology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Dietary Patterns Martin, Megan Thomas, Kate Melanson, Kathleen Diet Quality Differs Significantly in Higher Plant Protein Consumers vs Higher Animal Protein Consumers |
title | Diet Quality Differs Significantly in Higher Plant Protein Consumers vs Higher Animal Protein Consumers |
title_full | Diet Quality Differs Significantly in Higher Plant Protein Consumers vs Higher Animal Protein Consumers |
title_fullStr | Diet Quality Differs Significantly in Higher Plant Protein Consumers vs Higher Animal Protein Consumers |
title_full_unstemmed | Diet Quality Differs Significantly in Higher Plant Protein Consumers vs Higher Animal Protein Consumers |
title_short | Diet Quality Differs Significantly in Higher Plant Protein Consumers vs Higher Animal Protein Consumers |
title_sort | diet quality differs significantly in higher plant protein consumers vs higher animal protein consumers |
topic | Dietary Patterns |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9193722/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzac054.035 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT martinmegan dietqualitydifferssignificantlyinhigherplantproteinconsumersvshigheranimalproteinconsumers AT thomaskate dietqualitydifferssignificantlyinhigherplantproteinconsumersvshigheranimalproteinconsumers AT melansonkathleen dietqualitydifferssignificantlyinhigherplantproteinconsumersvshigheranimalproteinconsumers |