Cargando…

Effect of a Short-Term Low Glycemic Index Dietary Intervention on Ad Libitum Food Intake, Diet Quality, and Subjective Appetite Ratings in Preschoolers

OBJECTIVES: To examine the effect of ad-libitum low-glycemic index (GI; high fiber) versus high-GI diet on energy intake, diet quality (Healthy Eating Index 2015 (HEI-2015)), self-reported feelings of hunger and fullness, liking of the foods, and physical activity (PA) in preschoolers. METHODS: Twen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hasan, Faten, Gaylinn, Bruce, Malin, Steven, Weltman, Arthur, Angadi, Siddhartha, Patrie, James, Kranz, Sibylle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9194067/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzac065.021
_version_ 1784726628087103488
author Hasan, Faten
Gaylinn, Bruce
Malin, Steven
Weltman, Arthur
Angadi, Siddhartha
Patrie, James
Kranz, Sibylle
author_facet Hasan, Faten
Gaylinn, Bruce
Malin, Steven
Weltman, Arthur
Angadi, Siddhartha
Patrie, James
Kranz, Sibylle
author_sort Hasan, Faten
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To examine the effect of ad-libitum low-glycemic index (GI; high fiber) versus high-GI diet on energy intake, diet quality (Healthy Eating Index 2015 (HEI-2015)), self-reported feelings of hunger and fullness, liking of the foods, and physical activity (PA) in preschoolers. METHODS: Twenty-five healthy preschoolers (aged 48 ± 7.3 mo, 47% females, 73% healthy weight) were recruited to participate in “day camps” of two low- and two high-GI (usual diet) days. Food and nutrient consumption, HEI-2015 scores, pre- and post-lunch hunger ratings, food liking, and PA were measured each day. Paired t-tests were used to compare treatment differences. Results were stratified into healthy (HW; <85% of BMI-for Age z-score of the CDC growth charts) and non-healthy weight (NHW; ≥85%) and compared within- (by diet) and between- (HW vs NHW) groups. RESULTS: GI and glycemic load (GL) were significantly lower on the low- versus high- GI diet (GI: 46.5 ± 3.3 vs 58.2 ± 5.1, GL: 24.9 ± 16.8 vs 47.4 ± 17.9, respectively; P < 0.01). Children consumed more total fiber while eating the low-GI diet (14.6 ± 8.8g vs 6.4 ± 2.6, P < 0.001), despite no difference between low- and high-GI diets in total energy (459.3 ± 230.6 vs 497.5 ± 173.9kcal, p< 0.001), carbohydrate (82.9 ± 45.1 vs 87.4 ± 30.9g, p = 0.55), fat (10.5 ± 5.2 vs 12.3 ± 5.7g, p = 0.07), and protein (14.4 ± 8.4 vs 12.0 ± 5.1, p = 0.05) intake, respectively. Mean HEI-2015 scores were higher on the low- versus high-GI diets (85.2 ± 11.6 and 59.4 ± 7.0, respectively; P < 0.001). There were no differences in hunger (p > 0.26), food liking (p > 0.01), or PA (p = 0.88) between diets. Fewer NHW children reported being “full” compared to HW children, (26% vs 52%, respectively, p = 0.03), yet both groups had similar energy intake (467.5 ± 155.0 and 482.1 ± 220.7kcal, respectively, p = 0.78). CONCLUSIONS: An ad libitum low-GI diet provided better diet quality in preschoolers, with no difference in food liking. Although there was no effect on hunger, body mass may influence response to food intake and suggests eating in the absence of hunger observed in the overweight/obese children. Additional work is needed to better understand the effect of low-GI diets and fiber consumption on appetite regulation in preschoolers with overweight/obesity. FUNDING SOURCES: This study was funded by the University of Virginia School of Education and Human Development Initiative Fund.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9194067
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91940672022-06-14 Effect of a Short-Term Low Glycemic Index Dietary Intervention on Ad Libitum Food Intake, Diet Quality, and Subjective Appetite Ratings in Preschoolers Hasan, Faten Gaylinn, Bruce Malin, Steven Weltman, Arthur Angadi, Siddhartha Patrie, James Kranz, Sibylle Curr Dev Nutr Nutrition Education and Behavioral Science OBJECTIVES: To examine the effect of ad-libitum low-glycemic index (GI; high fiber) versus high-GI diet on energy intake, diet quality (Healthy Eating Index 2015 (HEI-2015)), self-reported feelings of hunger and fullness, liking of the foods, and physical activity (PA) in preschoolers. METHODS: Twenty-five healthy preschoolers (aged 48 ± 7.3 mo, 47% females, 73% healthy weight) were recruited to participate in “day camps” of two low- and two high-GI (usual diet) days. Food and nutrient consumption, HEI-2015 scores, pre- and post-lunch hunger ratings, food liking, and PA were measured each day. Paired t-tests were used to compare treatment differences. Results were stratified into healthy (HW; <85% of BMI-for Age z-score of the CDC growth charts) and non-healthy weight (NHW; ≥85%) and compared within- (by diet) and between- (HW vs NHW) groups. RESULTS: GI and glycemic load (GL) were significantly lower on the low- versus high- GI diet (GI: 46.5 ± 3.3 vs 58.2 ± 5.1, GL: 24.9 ± 16.8 vs 47.4 ± 17.9, respectively; P < 0.01). Children consumed more total fiber while eating the low-GI diet (14.6 ± 8.8g vs 6.4 ± 2.6, P < 0.001), despite no difference between low- and high-GI diets in total energy (459.3 ± 230.6 vs 497.5 ± 173.9kcal, p< 0.001), carbohydrate (82.9 ± 45.1 vs 87.4 ± 30.9g, p = 0.55), fat (10.5 ± 5.2 vs 12.3 ± 5.7g, p = 0.07), and protein (14.4 ± 8.4 vs 12.0 ± 5.1, p = 0.05) intake, respectively. Mean HEI-2015 scores were higher on the low- versus high-GI diets (85.2 ± 11.6 and 59.4 ± 7.0, respectively; P < 0.001). There were no differences in hunger (p > 0.26), food liking (p > 0.01), or PA (p = 0.88) between diets. Fewer NHW children reported being “full” compared to HW children, (26% vs 52%, respectively, p = 0.03), yet both groups had similar energy intake (467.5 ± 155.0 and 482.1 ± 220.7kcal, respectively, p = 0.78). CONCLUSIONS: An ad libitum low-GI diet provided better diet quality in preschoolers, with no difference in food liking. Although there was no effect on hunger, body mass may influence response to food intake and suggests eating in the absence of hunger observed in the overweight/obese children. Additional work is needed to better understand the effect of low-GI diets and fiber consumption on appetite regulation in preschoolers with overweight/obesity. FUNDING SOURCES: This study was funded by the University of Virginia School of Education and Human Development Initiative Fund. Oxford University Press 2022-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9194067/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzac065.021 Text en © The Author 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The International Society for Human and Animal Mycology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Nutrition Education and Behavioral Science
Hasan, Faten
Gaylinn, Bruce
Malin, Steven
Weltman, Arthur
Angadi, Siddhartha
Patrie, James
Kranz, Sibylle
Effect of a Short-Term Low Glycemic Index Dietary Intervention on Ad Libitum Food Intake, Diet Quality, and Subjective Appetite Ratings in Preschoolers
title Effect of a Short-Term Low Glycemic Index Dietary Intervention on Ad Libitum Food Intake, Diet Quality, and Subjective Appetite Ratings in Preschoolers
title_full Effect of a Short-Term Low Glycemic Index Dietary Intervention on Ad Libitum Food Intake, Diet Quality, and Subjective Appetite Ratings in Preschoolers
title_fullStr Effect of a Short-Term Low Glycemic Index Dietary Intervention on Ad Libitum Food Intake, Diet Quality, and Subjective Appetite Ratings in Preschoolers
title_full_unstemmed Effect of a Short-Term Low Glycemic Index Dietary Intervention on Ad Libitum Food Intake, Diet Quality, and Subjective Appetite Ratings in Preschoolers
title_short Effect of a Short-Term Low Glycemic Index Dietary Intervention on Ad Libitum Food Intake, Diet Quality, and Subjective Appetite Ratings in Preschoolers
title_sort effect of a short-term low glycemic index dietary intervention on ad libitum food intake, diet quality, and subjective appetite ratings in preschoolers
topic Nutrition Education and Behavioral Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9194067/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzac065.021
work_keys_str_mv AT hasanfaten effectofashorttermlowglycemicindexdietaryinterventiononadlibitumfoodintakedietqualityandsubjectiveappetiteratingsinpreschoolers
AT gaylinnbruce effectofashorttermlowglycemicindexdietaryinterventiononadlibitumfoodintakedietqualityandsubjectiveappetiteratingsinpreschoolers
AT malinsteven effectofashorttermlowglycemicindexdietaryinterventiononadlibitumfoodintakedietqualityandsubjectiveappetiteratingsinpreschoolers
AT weltmanarthur effectofashorttermlowglycemicindexdietaryinterventiononadlibitumfoodintakedietqualityandsubjectiveappetiteratingsinpreschoolers
AT angadisiddhartha effectofashorttermlowglycemicindexdietaryinterventiononadlibitumfoodintakedietqualityandsubjectiveappetiteratingsinpreschoolers
AT patriejames effectofashorttermlowglycemicindexdietaryinterventiononadlibitumfoodintakedietqualityandsubjectiveappetiteratingsinpreschoolers
AT kranzsibylle effectofashorttermlowglycemicindexdietaryinterventiononadlibitumfoodintakedietqualityandsubjectiveappetiteratingsinpreschoolers