Cargando…
Gating and anion selectivity are reciprocally regulated in TMEM16A (ANO1)
Numerous essential physiological processes depend on the TMEM16A-mediated Ca(2+)-activated chloride fluxes. Extensive structure–function studies have helped to elucidate the Ca(2+) gating mechanism of TMEM16A, revealing a Ca(2+)-sensing element close to the anion pore that alters conduction. However...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Rockefeller University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9194859/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35687042 http://dx.doi.org/10.1085/jgp.202113027 |
_version_ | 1784726814938103808 |
---|---|
author | De Jesús-Pérez, José J. López-Romero, Ana E. Posadas, Odalys Segura-Covarrubias, Guadalupe Aréchiga-Figueroa, Iván Gutiérrez-Medina, Braulio Pérez-Cornejo, Patricia Arreola, Jorge |
author_facet | De Jesús-Pérez, José J. López-Romero, Ana E. Posadas, Odalys Segura-Covarrubias, Guadalupe Aréchiga-Figueroa, Iván Gutiérrez-Medina, Braulio Pérez-Cornejo, Patricia Arreola, Jorge |
author_sort | De Jesús-Pérez, José J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Numerous essential physiological processes depend on the TMEM16A-mediated Ca(2+)-activated chloride fluxes. Extensive structure–function studies have helped to elucidate the Ca(2+) gating mechanism of TMEM16A, revealing a Ca(2+)-sensing element close to the anion pore that alters conduction. However, substrate selection and the substrate–gating relationship in TMEM16A remain less explored. Here, we study the gating–permeant anion relationship on mouse TMEM16A expressed in HEK 293 cells using electrophysiological recordings coupled with site-directed mutagenesis. We show that the apparent Ca(2+) sensitivity of TMEM16A increased with highly permeant anions and SCN(−) mole fractions, likely by stabilizing bound Ca(2+). Conversely, mutations at crucial gating elements, including the Ca(2+)-binding site 1, the transmembrane helix 6 (TM6), and the hydrophobic gate, impaired the anion permeability and selectivity of TMEM16A. Finally, we found that, unlike anion-selective wild-type channels, the voltage dependence of unselective TMEM16A mutant channels was less sensitive to SCN(−). Therefore, our work identifies structural determinants of selectivity at the Ca(2+) site, TM6, and hydrophobic gate and reveals a reciprocal regulation of gating and selectivity. We suggest that this regulation is essential to set ionic selectivity and the Ca(2+) and voltage sensitivities in TMEM16A. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9194859 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Rockefeller University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91948592023-02-01 Gating and anion selectivity are reciprocally regulated in TMEM16A (ANO1) De Jesús-Pérez, José J. López-Romero, Ana E. Posadas, Odalys Segura-Covarrubias, Guadalupe Aréchiga-Figueroa, Iván Gutiérrez-Medina, Braulio Pérez-Cornejo, Patricia Arreola, Jorge J Gen Physiol Communication Numerous essential physiological processes depend on the TMEM16A-mediated Ca(2+)-activated chloride fluxes. Extensive structure–function studies have helped to elucidate the Ca(2+) gating mechanism of TMEM16A, revealing a Ca(2+)-sensing element close to the anion pore that alters conduction. However, substrate selection and the substrate–gating relationship in TMEM16A remain less explored. Here, we study the gating–permeant anion relationship on mouse TMEM16A expressed in HEK 293 cells using electrophysiological recordings coupled with site-directed mutagenesis. We show that the apparent Ca(2+) sensitivity of TMEM16A increased with highly permeant anions and SCN(−) mole fractions, likely by stabilizing bound Ca(2+). Conversely, mutations at crucial gating elements, including the Ca(2+)-binding site 1, the transmembrane helix 6 (TM6), and the hydrophobic gate, impaired the anion permeability and selectivity of TMEM16A. Finally, we found that, unlike anion-selective wild-type channels, the voltage dependence of unselective TMEM16A mutant channels was less sensitive to SCN(−). Therefore, our work identifies structural determinants of selectivity at the Ca(2+) site, TM6, and hydrophobic gate and reveals a reciprocal regulation of gating and selectivity. We suggest that this regulation is essential to set ionic selectivity and the Ca(2+) and voltage sensitivities in TMEM16A. Rockefeller University Press 2022-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9194859/ /pubmed/35687042 http://dx.doi.org/10.1085/jgp.202113027 Text en © 2022 De Jesús-Pérez et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/http://www.rupress.org/terms/This article is distributed under the terms of an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike–No Mirror Sites license for the first six months after the publication date (see http://www.rupress.org/terms/). After six months it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 4.0 International license, as described at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Communication De Jesús-Pérez, José J. López-Romero, Ana E. Posadas, Odalys Segura-Covarrubias, Guadalupe Aréchiga-Figueroa, Iván Gutiérrez-Medina, Braulio Pérez-Cornejo, Patricia Arreola, Jorge Gating and anion selectivity are reciprocally regulated in TMEM16A (ANO1) |
title | Gating and anion selectivity are reciprocally regulated in TMEM16A (ANO1) |
title_full | Gating and anion selectivity are reciprocally regulated in TMEM16A (ANO1) |
title_fullStr | Gating and anion selectivity are reciprocally regulated in TMEM16A (ANO1) |
title_full_unstemmed | Gating and anion selectivity are reciprocally regulated in TMEM16A (ANO1) |
title_short | Gating and anion selectivity are reciprocally regulated in TMEM16A (ANO1) |
title_sort | gating and anion selectivity are reciprocally regulated in tmem16a (ano1) |
topic | Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9194859/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35687042 http://dx.doi.org/10.1085/jgp.202113027 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dejesusperezjosej gatingandanionselectivityarereciprocallyregulatedintmem16aano1 AT lopezromeroanae gatingandanionselectivityarereciprocallyregulatedintmem16aano1 AT posadasodalys gatingandanionselectivityarereciprocallyregulatedintmem16aano1 AT seguracovarrubiasguadalupe gatingandanionselectivityarereciprocallyregulatedintmem16aano1 AT arechigafigueroaivan gatingandanionselectivityarereciprocallyregulatedintmem16aano1 AT gutierrezmedinabraulio gatingandanionselectivityarereciprocallyregulatedintmem16aano1 AT perezcornejopatricia gatingandanionselectivityarereciprocallyregulatedintmem16aano1 AT arreolajorge gatingandanionselectivityarereciprocallyregulatedintmem16aano1 |