Cargando…

Perspective on the Relationship between GABA(A) Receptor Activity and the Apparent Potency of an Inhibitor

Background: In electrophysiological experiments, inhibition of a receptor-channel, such as the GABA(A) receptor, is measured by co-applying an agonist producing a predefined control response with an inhibitor to calculate the fraction of the control response remaining in the presence of the inhibito...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Germann, Allison L., Pierce, Spencer R., Evers, Alex S., Steinbach, Joe Henry, Akk, Gustav
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bentham Science Publishers 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9199547/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34784870
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1570159X19666211104142433
Descripción
Sumario:Background: In electrophysiological experiments, inhibition of a receptor-channel, such as the GABA(A) receptor, is measured by co-applying an agonist producing a predefined control response with an inhibitor to calculate the fraction of the control response remaining in the presence of the inhibitor. The properties of the inhibitor are determined by fitting the inhibition concentration-response relationship to the Hill equation to estimate the midpoint (IC(50)) of the inhibition curve. Objective: We sought to estimate sensitivity of the fitted IC(50) to the level of activity of the control response. Methods: The inhibition concentration-response relationships were calculated for models with distinct mechanisms of inhibition. In Model I, the inhibitor acts allosterically to stabilize the resting state of the receptor. In Model II, the inhibitor competes with the agonist for a shared binding site. In Model III, the inhibitor stabilizes the desensitized state. Results: The simulations indicate that the fitted IC(50) of the inhibition curve is sensitive to the degree of activity of the control response. In Models I and II, the IC(50) of inhibition was increased as the probability of being in the active state (P(A)) of the control response increased. In Model III, the IC(50) of inhibition was reduced at higher P(A). Conclusion: We infer that the apparent potency of an inhibitor depends on the P(A) of the control response. While the calculations were carried out using the activation and inhibition properties that are representative of the GABA(A) receptor, the principles and conclusions apply to a wide variety of receptor-channels.