Cargando…
Evaluation of an experiential clinical learning option during pandemic teaching suspensions
BACKGROUND: As students’ direct patient contact was suspended because of COVID-19-related restrictions, we revised our clinical addiction medicine curriculum for students to learn about the different multidisciplinary clinical models delivered at our hospital and in community settings. Our aim was t...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9205138/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35715779 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03530-4 |
_version_ | 1784729066136403968 |
---|---|
author | Canfield, Jules Truong, Ve Bereznicka, Agata Lunze, Karsten |
author_facet | Canfield, Jules Truong, Ve Bereznicka, Agata Lunze, Karsten |
author_sort | Canfield, Jules |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: As students’ direct patient contact was suspended because of COVID-19-related restrictions, we revised our clinical addiction medicine curriculum for students to learn about the different multidisciplinary clinical models delivered at our hospital and in community settings. Our aim was to provide an overview of clinical modalities and familiarize learners with clinician and patient experiential perspectives. METHODS: We implemented a multi-pronged approach, offering an overview of clinical care programs through remote panels involving care providers at the clinics where students had previously been scheduled for in-person rotations. This included inpatient and office-based addiction services, addiction treatment program for adolescents and young adults, integrated addiction care and HIV primary care clinic, and opioid use urgent care clinic. Beyond having them join outpatient telehealth clinic visits, students also participated in an online panel involving patients in recovery to gain familiarity with their care perspectives; and joined a panel with recovery coaches to get further insights into patient challenges in clinical settings. Students further participated in remote opioid treatment trainings and observed clinical rounds of inpatient addiction consults and adolescent clinic team meetings. RESULTS: With this revised curriculum, students learned about the variety of clinical modalities at the height of our hospital’s COVID-19 pandemic burden. The evaluation suggested that students appreciated the authenticity of accounts from patients and providers about their challenges and satisfaction related to clinical care. While in a remote learning setting, students overall wished for more personal interaction with patients and providers. They also noted a lack of group cohesion and connection that they felt would otherwise have been met in an in-person program. CONCLUSIONS: Remote learning allowed our program to connect trainees to the multidisciplinary field of addiction medicine despite the COVID-19 pandemic. In future program iterations, we will consider hybrid formats of in-person learning experiences with direct patient and faculty contact where possible, combined with online provider and patient panels possibly, in addition to virtual breakout formats to facilitate more personal student-patient and student-faculty interactions. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-022-03530-4. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9205138 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92051382022-06-17 Evaluation of an experiential clinical learning option during pandemic teaching suspensions Canfield, Jules Truong, Ve Bereznicka, Agata Lunze, Karsten BMC Med Educ Research BACKGROUND: As students’ direct patient contact was suspended because of COVID-19-related restrictions, we revised our clinical addiction medicine curriculum for students to learn about the different multidisciplinary clinical models delivered at our hospital and in community settings. Our aim was to provide an overview of clinical modalities and familiarize learners with clinician and patient experiential perspectives. METHODS: We implemented a multi-pronged approach, offering an overview of clinical care programs through remote panels involving care providers at the clinics where students had previously been scheduled for in-person rotations. This included inpatient and office-based addiction services, addiction treatment program for adolescents and young adults, integrated addiction care and HIV primary care clinic, and opioid use urgent care clinic. Beyond having them join outpatient telehealth clinic visits, students also participated in an online panel involving patients in recovery to gain familiarity with their care perspectives; and joined a panel with recovery coaches to get further insights into patient challenges in clinical settings. Students further participated in remote opioid treatment trainings and observed clinical rounds of inpatient addiction consults and adolescent clinic team meetings. RESULTS: With this revised curriculum, students learned about the variety of clinical modalities at the height of our hospital’s COVID-19 pandemic burden. The evaluation suggested that students appreciated the authenticity of accounts from patients and providers about their challenges and satisfaction related to clinical care. While in a remote learning setting, students overall wished for more personal interaction with patients and providers. They also noted a lack of group cohesion and connection that they felt would otherwise have been met in an in-person program. CONCLUSIONS: Remote learning allowed our program to connect trainees to the multidisciplinary field of addiction medicine despite the COVID-19 pandemic. In future program iterations, we will consider hybrid formats of in-person learning experiences with direct patient and faculty contact where possible, combined with online provider and patient panels possibly, in addition to virtual breakout formats to facilitate more personal student-patient and student-faculty interactions. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-022-03530-4. BioMed Central 2022-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9205138/ /pubmed/35715779 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03530-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Canfield, Jules Truong, Ve Bereznicka, Agata Lunze, Karsten Evaluation of an experiential clinical learning option during pandemic teaching suspensions |
title | Evaluation of an experiential clinical learning option during pandemic teaching suspensions |
title_full | Evaluation of an experiential clinical learning option during pandemic teaching suspensions |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of an experiential clinical learning option during pandemic teaching suspensions |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of an experiential clinical learning option during pandemic teaching suspensions |
title_short | Evaluation of an experiential clinical learning option during pandemic teaching suspensions |
title_sort | evaluation of an experiential clinical learning option during pandemic teaching suspensions |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9205138/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35715779 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03530-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT canfieldjules evaluationofanexperientialclinicallearningoptionduringpandemicteachingsuspensions AT truongve evaluationofanexperientialclinicallearningoptionduringpandemicteachingsuspensions AT bereznickaagata evaluationofanexperientialclinicallearningoptionduringpandemicteachingsuspensions AT lunzekarsten evaluationofanexperientialclinicallearningoptionduringpandemicteachingsuspensions |