Cargando…

Evaluation of an experiential clinical learning option during pandemic teaching suspensions

BACKGROUND: As students’ direct patient contact was suspended because of COVID-19-related restrictions, we revised our clinical addiction medicine curriculum for students to learn about the different multidisciplinary clinical models delivered at our hospital and in community settings. Our aim was t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Canfield, Jules, Truong, Ve, Bereznicka, Agata, Lunze, Karsten
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9205138/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35715779
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03530-4
_version_ 1784729066136403968
author Canfield, Jules
Truong, Ve
Bereznicka, Agata
Lunze, Karsten
author_facet Canfield, Jules
Truong, Ve
Bereznicka, Agata
Lunze, Karsten
author_sort Canfield, Jules
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: As students’ direct patient contact was suspended because of COVID-19-related restrictions, we revised our clinical addiction medicine curriculum for students to learn about the different multidisciplinary clinical models delivered at our hospital and in community settings. Our aim was to provide an overview of clinical modalities and familiarize learners with clinician and patient experiential perspectives. METHODS: We implemented a multi-pronged approach, offering an overview of clinical care programs through remote panels involving care providers at the clinics where students had previously been scheduled for in-person rotations. This included inpatient and office-based addiction services, addiction treatment program for adolescents and young adults, integrated addiction care and HIV primary care clinic, and opioid use urgent care clinic. Beyond having them join outpatient telehealth clinic visits, students also participated in an online panel involving patients in recovery to gain familiarity with their care perspectives; and joined a panel with recovery coaches to get further insights into patient challenges in clinical settings. Students further participated in remote opioid treatment trainings and observed clinical rounds of inpatient addiction consults and adolescent clinic team meetings. RESULTS: With this revised curriculum, students learned about the variety of clinical modalities at the height of our hospital’s COVID-19 pandemic burden. The evaluation suggested that students appreciated the authenticity of accounts from patients and providers about their challenges and satisfaction related to clinical care. While in a remote learning setting, students overall wished for more personal interaction with patients and providers. They also noted a lack of group cohesion and connection that they felt would otherwise have been met in an in-person program. CONCLUSIONS: Remote learning allowed our program to connect trainees to the multidisciplinary field of addiction medicine despite the COVID-19 pandemic. In future program iterations, we will consider hybrid formats of in-person learning experiences with direct patient and faculty contact where possible, combined with online provider and patient panels possibly, in addition to virtual breakout formats to facilitate more personal student-patient and student-faculty interactions. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-022-03530-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9205138
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92051382022-06-17 Evaluation of an experiential clinical learning option during pandemic teaching suspensions Canfield, Jules Truong, Ve Bereznicka, Agata Lunze, Karsten BMC Med Educ Research BACKGROUND: As students’ direct patient contact was suspended because of COVID-19-related restrictions, we revised our clinical addiction medicine curriculum for students to learn about the different multidisciplinary clinical models delivered at our hospital and in community settings. Our aim was to provide an overview of clinical modalities and familiarize learners with clinician and patient experiential perspectives. METHODS: We implemented a multi-pronged approach, offering an overview of clinical care programs through remote panels involving care providers at the clinics where students had previously been scheduled for in-person rotations. This included inpatient and office-based addiction services, addiction treatment program for adolescents and young adults, integrated addiction care and HIV primary care clinic, and opioid use urgent care clinic. Beyond having them join outpatient telehealth clinic visits, students also participated in an online panel involving patients in recovery to gain familiarity with their care perspectives; and joined a panel with recovery coaches to get further insights into patient challenges in clinical settings. Students further participated in remote opioid treatment trainings and observed clinical rounds of inpatient addiction consults and adolescent clinic team meetings. RESULTS: With this revised curriculum, students learned about the variety of clinical modalities at the height of our hospital’s COVID-19 pandemic burden. The evaluation suggested that students appreciated the authenticity of accounts from patients and providers about their challenges and satisfaction related to clinical care. While in a remote learning setting, students overall wished for more personal interaction with patients and providers. They also noted a lack of group cohesion and connection that they felt would otherwise have been met in an in-person program. CONCLUSIONS: Remote learning allowed our program to connect trainees to the multidisciplinary field of addiction medicine despite the COVID-19 pandemic. In future program iterations, we will consider hybrid formats of in-person learning experiences with direct patient and faculty contact where possible, combined with online provider and patient panels possibly, in addition to virtual breakout formats to facilitate more personal student-patient and student-faculty interactions. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-022-03530-4. BioMed Central 2022-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9205138/ /pubmed/35715779 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03530-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Canfield, Jules
Truong, Ve
Bereznicka, Agata
Lunze, Karsten
Evaluation of an experiential clinical learning option during pandemic teaching suspensions
title Evaluation of an experiential clinical learning option during pandemic teaching suspensions
title_full Evaluation of an experiential clinical learning option during pandemic teaching suspensions
title_fullStr Evaluation of an experiential clinical learning option during pandemic teaching suspensions
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of an experiential clinical learning option during pandemic teaching suspensions
title_short Evaluation of an experiential clinical learning option during pandemic teaching suspensions
title_sort evaluation of an experiential clinical learning option during pandemic teaching suspensions
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9205138/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35715779
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03530-4
work_keys_str_mv AT canfieldjules evaluationofanexperientialclinicallearningoptionduringpandemicteachingsuspensions
AT truongve evaluationofanexperientialclinicallearningoptionduringpandemicteachingsuspensions
AT bereznickaagata evaluationofanexperientialclinicallearningoptionduringpandemicteachingsuspensions
AT lunzekarsten evaluationofanexperientialclinicallearningoptionduringpandemicteachingsuspensions