Cargando…

477 The Climate is Changing, Why Cant We? Faculty Perspectives on Education for Sustainable Healthcare in Health Education

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Despite calls for the integration of Education for Sustainable Healthcare (ESH) into health professional training programs, most curricula have yet to adapt accordingly. This qualitative study sought to understand faculty perspectives on ESH knowledge, interest, barriers, and facil...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hampshire, Karly, Nicastro, Tammy, Teherani, Arianne, Weiser, Sheri
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9209037/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2022.280
_version_ 1784729848230445056
author Hampshire, Karly
Nicastro, Tammy
Teherani, Arianne
Weiser, Sheri
author_facet Hampshire, Karly
Nicastro, Tammy
Teherani, Arianne
Weiser, Sheri
author_sort Hampshire, Karly
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Despite calls for the integration of Education for Sustainable Healthcare (ESH) into health professional training programs, most curricula have yet to adapt accordingly. This qualitative study sought to understand faculty perspectives on ESH knowledge, interest, barriers, and facilitators. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: From 2018 to 2020, 71 health professional education faculty from 6 University of California (UC) campuses participated in ESH integration workshops. Using purposeful sampling based on gender and campus, a subset of workshop faculty participants were selected to participate in individual interviews. Interviews were conducted via Zoom using a structured interview guide, eliciting participants experience integrating ESH, perceived barriers and facilitators, and perspectives on student, faculty, and health science leadership knowledge and interest. Transcripts were double coded with an inductive-deductive approach using Dedoose, reconciled, and analyzed to identify themes. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Participants included 17 faculty at 6 UC campuses representing diverse health disciplines. Although participants noted high general awareness of and interest in climate change among students and faculty, they observed a lack of specific, health-relevant knowledge, resulting in discomfort communicating with others on climate and health. Perceived barriers to expansion of ESH included limited curricular space, competing topics, and lack of faculty expertise. Participants posited that framing climate change in health terms, establishing learning objectives and protected faculty time, identifying connections to ESH within existing research and curriculum, and obtaining commitments from campus leadership would facilitate successful ESH integration. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Our findings reinforce student and faculty interest in ESH curricular integration and identify important barriers and facilitators, lending context for educators planning ESH infusion. Training of faculty on climate health is urgently needed for ESH integration in health professional education.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9209037
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92090372022-07-01 477 The Climate is Changing, Why Cant We? Faculty Perspectives on Education for Sustainable Healthcare in Health Education Hampshire, Karly Nicastro, Tammy Teherani, Arianne Weiser, Sheri J Clin Transl Sci Workforce Development OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Despite calls for the integration of Education for Sustainable Healthcare (ESH) into health professional training programs, most curricula have yet to adapt accordingly. This qualitative study sought to understand faculty perspectives on ESH knowledge, interest, barriers, and facilitators. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: From 2018 to 2020, 71 health professional education faculty from 6 University of California (UC) campuses participated in ESH integration workshops. Using purposeful sampling based on gender and campus, a subset of workshop faculty participants were selected to participate in individual interviews. Interviews were conducted via Zoom using a structured interview guide, eliciting participants experience integrating ESH, perceived barriers and facilitators, and perspectives on student, faculty, and health science leadership knowledge and interest. Transcripts were double coded with an inductive-deductive approach using Dedoose, reconciled, and analyzed to identify themes. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Participants included 17 faculty at 6 UC campuses representing diverse health disciplines. Although participants noted high general awareness of and interest in climate change among students and faculty, they observed a lack of specific, health-relevant knowledge, resulting in discomfort communicating with others on climate and health. Perceived barriers to expansion of ESH included limited curricular space, competing topics, and lack of faculty expertise. Participants posited that framing climate change in health terms, establishing learning objectives and protected faculty time, identifying connections to ESH within existing research and curriculum, and obtaining commitments from campus leadership would facilitate successful ESH integration. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Our findings reinforce student and faculty interest in ESH curricular integration and identify important barriers and facilitators, lending context for educators planning ESH infusion. Training of faculty on climate health is urgently needed for ESH integration in health professional education. Cambridge University Press 2022-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9209037/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2022.280 Text en © The Association for Clinical and Translational Science 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
spellingShingle Workforce Development
Hampshire, Karly
Nicastro, Tammy
Teherani, Arianne
Weiser, Sheri
477 The Climate is Changing, Why Cant We? Faculty Perspectives on Education for Sustainable Healthcare in Health Education
title 477 The Climate is Changing, Why Cant We? Faculty Perspectives on Education for Sustainable Healthcare in Health Education
title_full 477 The Climate is Changing, Why Cant We? Faculty Perspectives on Education for Sustainable Healthcare in Health Education
title_fullStr 477 The Climate is Changing, Why Cant We? Faculty Perspectives on Education for Sustainable Healthcare in Health Education
title_full_unstemmed 477 The Climate is Changing, Why Cant We? Faculty Perspectives on Education for Sustainable Healthcare in Health Education
title_short 477 The Climate is Changing, Why Cant We? Faculty Perspectives on Education for Sustainable Healthcare in Health Education
title_sort 477 the climate is changing, why cant we? faculty perspectives on education for sustainable healthcare in health education
topic Workforce Development
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9209037/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2022.280
work_keys_str_mv AT hampshirekarly 477theclimateischangingwhycantwefacultyperspectivesoneducationforsustainablehealthcareinhealtheducation
AT nicastrotammy 477theclimateischangingwhycantwefacultyperspectivesoneducationforsustainablehealthcareinhealtheducation
AT teheraniarianne 477theclimateischangingwhycantwefacultyperspectivesoneducationforsustainablehealthcareinhealtheducation
AT weisersheri 477theclimateischangingwhycantwefacultyperspectivesoneducationforsustainablehealthcareinhealtheducation