Cargando…
477 The Climate is Changing, Why Cant We? Faculty Perspectives on Education for Sustainable Healthcare in Health Education
OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Despite calls for the integration of Education for Sustainable Healthcare (ESH) into health professional training programs, most curricula have yet to adapt accordingly. This qualitative study sought to understand faculty perspectives on ESH knowledge, interest, barriers, and facil...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9209037/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2022.280 |
_version_ | 1784729848230445056 |
---|---|
author | Hampshire, Karly Nicastro, Tammy Teherani, Arianne Weiser, Sheri |
author_facet | Hampshire, Karly Nicastro, Tammy Teherani, Arianne Weiser, Sheri |
author_sort | Hampshire, Karly |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Despite calls for the integration of Education for Sustainable Healthcare (ESH) into health professional training programs, most curricula have yet to adapt accordingly. This qualitative study sought to understand faculty perspectives on ESH knowledge, interest, barriers, and facilitators. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: From 2018 to 2020, 71 health professional education faculty from 6 University of California (UC) campuses participated in ESH integration workshops. Using purposeful sampling based on gender and campus, a subset of workshop faculty participants were selected to participate in individual interviews. Interviews were conducted via Zoom using a structured interview guide, eliciting participants experience integrating ESH, perceived barriers and facilitators, and perspectives on student, faculty, and health science leadership knowledge and interest. Transcripts were double coded with an inductive-deductive approach using Dedoose, reconciled, and analyzed to identify themes. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Participants included 17 faculty at 6 UC campuses representing diverse health disciplines. Although participants noted high general awareness of and interest in climate change among students and faculty, they observed a lack of specific, health-relevant knowledge, resulting in discomfort communicating with others on climate and health. Perceived barriers to expansion of ESH included limited curricular space, competing topics, and lack of faculty expertise. Participants posited that framing climate change in health terms, establishing learning objectives and protected faculty time, identifying connections to ESH within existing research and curriculum, and obtaining commitments from campus leadership would facilitate successful ESH integration. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Our findings reinforce student and faculty interest in ESH curricular integration and identify important barriers and facilitators, lending context for educators planning ESH infusion. Training of faculty on climate health is urgently needed for ESH integration in health professional education. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9209037 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92090372022-07-01 477 The Climate is Changing, Why Cant We? Faculty Perspectives on Education for Sustainable Healthcare in Health Education Hampshire, Karly Nicastro, Tammy Teherani, Arianne Weiser, Sheri J Clin Transl Sci Workforce Development OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Despite calls for the integration of Education for Sustainable Healthcare (ESH) into health professional training programs, most curricula have yet to adapt accordingly. This qualitative study sought to understand faculty perspectives on ESH knowledge, interest, barriers, and facilitators. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: From 2018 to 2020, 71 health professional education faculty from 6 University of California (UC) campuses participated in ESH integration workshops. Using purposeful sampling based on gender and campus, a subset of workshop faculty participants were selected to participate in individual interviews. Interviews were conducted via Zoom using a structured interview guide, eliciting participants experience integrating ESH, perceived barriers and facilitators, and perspectives on student, faculty, and health science leadership knowledge and interest. Transcripts were double coded with an inductive-deductive approach using Dedoose, reconciled, and analyzed to identify themes. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Participants included 17 faculty at 6 UC campuses representing diverse health disciplines. Although participants noted high general awareness of and interest in climate change among students and faculty, they observed a lack of specific, health-relevant knowledge, resulting in discomfort communicating with others on climate and health. Perceived barriers to expansion of ESH included limited curricular space, competing topics, and lack of faculty expertise. Participants posited that framing climate change in health terms, establishing learning objectives and protected faculty time, identifying connections to ESH within existing research and curriculum, and obtaining commitments from campus leadership would facilitate successful ESH integration. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Our findings reinforce student and faculty interest in ESH curricular integration and identify important barriers and facilitators, lending context for educators planning ESH infusion. Training of faculty on climate health is urgently needed for ESH integration in health professional education. Cambridge University Press 2022-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9209037/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2022.280 Text en © The Association for Clinical and Translational Science 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work. |
spellingShingle | Workforce Development Hampshire, Karly Nicastro, Tammy Teherani, Arianne Weiser, Sheri 477 The Climate is Changing, Why Cant We? Faculty Perspectives on Education for Sustainable Healthcare in Health Education |
title | 477 The Climate is Changing, Why Cant We? Faculty Perspectives on Education for Sustainable Healthcare in Health Education |
title_full | 477 The Climate is Changing, Why Cant We? Faculty Perspectives on Education for Sustainable Healthcare in Health Education |
title_fullStr | 477 The Climate is Changing, Why Cant We? Faculty Perspectives on Education for Sustainable Healthcare in Health Education |
title_full_unstemmed | 477 The Climate is Changing, Why Cant We? Faculty Perspectives on Education for Sustainable Healthcare in Health Education |
title_short | 477 The Climate is Changing, Why Cant We? Faculty Perspectives on Education for Sustainable Healthcare in Health Education |
title_sort | 477 the climate is changing, why cant we? faculty perspectives on education for sustainable healthcare in health education |
topic | Workforce Development |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9209037/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2022.280 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hampshirekarly 477theclimateischangingwhycantwefacultyperspectivesoneducationforsustainablehealthcareinhealtheducation AT nicastrotammy 477theclimateischangingwhycantwefacultyperspectivesoneducationforsustainablehealthcareinhealtheducation AT teheraniarianne 477theclimateischangingwhycantwefacultyperspectivesoneducationforsustainablehealthcareinhealtheducation AT weisersheri 477theclimateischangingwhycantwefacultyperspectivesoneducationforsustainablehealthcareinhealtheducation |