Cargando…

Hypothesis: Why Different Types of SDH Gene Variants Cause Divergent Tumor Phenotypes

Despite two decades of paraganglioma-pheochromocytoma research, the fundamental question of how the different succinate dehydrogenase (SDH)-related tumor phenotypes are initiated has remained unanswered. Here, we discuss two possible scenarios by which missense (hypomorphic alleles) or truncating (n...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bayley, Jean-Pierre, Devilee, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9222429/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35741787
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes13061025
_version_ 1784732871691337728
author Bayley, Jean-Pierre
Devilee, Peter
author_facet Bayley, Jean-Pierre
Devilee, Peter
author_sort Bayley, Jean-Pierre
collection PubMed
description Despite two decades of paraganglioma-pheochromocytoma research, the fundamental question of how the different succinate dehydrogenase (SDH)-related tumor phenotypes are initiated has remained unanswered. Here, we discuss two possible scenarios by which missense (hypomorphic alleles) or truncating (null alleles) SDH gene variants determine clinical phenotype. Dysfunctional SDH is a major source of reactive oxygen species (ROS) but ROS are inhibited by rising succinate levels. In scenario 1, we propose that SDH missense variants disrupt electron flow, causing elevated ROS levels that are toxic in sympathetic PPGL precursor cells but well controlled in oxygen-sensing parasympathetic paraganglion cells. We also suggest that SDHAF2 variants, solely associated with HNPGL, may cause the reversal of succinate dehydrogenase to fumarate reductase, producing very high ROS levels. In scenario 2, we propose a modified succinate threshold model of tumor initiation. Truncating SDH variants cause high succinate accumulation and likely initiate tumorigenesis via disruption of 2-oxoglutarate-dependent enzymes in both PPGL and HNPGL precursor tissues. We propose that missense variants (including SDHAF2) cause lower succinate accumulation and thus initiate tumorigenesis only in very metabolically active tissues such as parasympathetic paraganglia, which naturally show very high levels of succinate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9222429
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92224292022-06-24 Hypothesis: Why Different Types of SDH Gene Variants Cause Divergent Tumor Phenotypes Bayley, Jean-Pierre Devilee, Peter Genes (Basel) Review Despite two decades of paraganglioma-pheochromocytoma research, the fundamental question of how the different succinate dehydrogenase (SDH)-related tumor phenotypes are initiated has remained unanswered. Here, we discuss two possible scenarios by which missense (hypomorphic alleles) or truncating (null alleles) SDH gene variants determine clinical phenotype. Dysfunctional SDH is a major source of reactive oxygen species (ROS) but ROS are inhibited by rising succinate levels. In scenario 1, we propose that SDH missense variants disrupt electron flow, causing elevated ROS levels that are toxic in sympathetic PPGL precursor cells but well controlled in oxygen-sensing parasympathetic paraganglion cells. We also suggest that SDHAF2 variants, solely associated with HNPGL, may cause the reversal of succinate dehydrogenase to fumarate reductase, producing very high ROS levels. In scenario 2, we propose a modified succinate threshold model of tumor initiation. Truncating SDH variants cause high succinate accumulation and likely initiate tumorigenesis via disruption of 2-oxoglutarate-dependent enzymes in both PPGL and HNPGL precursor tissues. We propose that missense variants (including SDHAF2) cause lower succinate accumulation and thus initiate tumorigenesis only in very metabolically active tissues such as parasympathetic paraganglia, which naturally show very high levels of succinate. MDPI 2022-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9222429/ /pubmed/35741787 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes13061025 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Bayley, Jean-Pierre
Devilee, Peter
Hypothesis: Why Different Types of SDH Gene Variants Cause Divergent Tumor Phenotypes
title Hypothesis: Why Different Types of SDH Gene Variants Cause Divergent Tumor Phenotypes
title_full Hypothesis: Why Different Types of SDH Gene Variants Cause Divergent Tumor Phenotypes
title_fullStr Hypothesis: Why Different Types of SDH Gene Variants Cause Divergent Tumor Phenotypes
title_full_unstemmed Hypothesis: Why Different Types of SDH Gene Variants Cause Divergent Tumor Phenotypes
title_short Hypothesis: Why Different Types of SDH Gene Variants Cause Divergent Tumor Phenotypes
title_sort hypothesis: why different types of sdh gene variants cause divergent tumor phenotypes
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9222429/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35741787
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes13061025
work_keys_str_mv AT bayleyjeanpierre hypothesiswhydifferenttypesofsdhgenevariantscausedivergenttumorphenotypes
AT devileepeter hypothesiswhydifferenttypesofsdhgenevariantscausedivergenttumorphenotypes