Cargando…
Evaluating Mono- and Combination Therapy of Meropenem and Amikacin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bacteremia in the Hollow-Fiber Infection Model
Debate continues as to the role of combination antibiotic therapy for the management of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. We studied the extent of bacterial killing by and the emergence of resistance to meropenem and amikacin as monotherapies and as a combination therapy against susceptible and res...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Society for Microbiology
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9241727/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35442072 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.00525-22 |
_version_ | 1784737877014347776 |
---|---|
author | Avent, Minyon L. McCarthy, Kate L. Sime, Fekade B. Naicker, Saiyuri Heffernan, Aaron J. Wallis, Steven C. Paterson, David L. Roberts, Jason A. |
author_facet | Avent, Minyon L. McCarthy, Kate L. Sime, Fekade B. Naicker, Saiyuri Heffernan, Aaron J. Wallis, Steven C. Paterson, David L. Roberts, Jason A. |
author_sort | Avent, Minyon L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Debate continues as to the role of combination antibiotic therapy for the management of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. We studied the extent of bacterial killing by and the emergence of resistance to meropenem and amikacin as monotherapies and as a combination therapy against susceptible and resistant P. aeruginosa isolates from bacteremic patients using the dynamic in vitro hollow-fiber infection model. Three P. aeruginosa isolates (meropenem MICs of 0.125, 0.25, and 64 mg/L) were used, simulating bacteremia with an initial inoculum of ~1 × 10(5) CFU/mL and the expected pharmacokinetics of meropenem and amikacin in critically ill patients. For isolates susceptible to amikacin and meropenem (isolates 1 and 2), the extent of bacterial killing was increased with the combination regimen compared with the killing by monotherapy of either antibiotic. Both the combination and meropenem monotherapy were able to sustain bacterial killing throughout the 7-day treatment course, whereas regrowth of bacteria occurred with amikacin monotherapy after 12 h. For the meropenem-resistant P. aeruginosa isolate (isolate 3), only the combination regimen demonstrated bacterial killing. Given that tailored antibiotic regimens can maximize potential synergy against some isolates, future studies should explore the benefit of combination therapy against resistant P. aeruginosa. IMPORTANCE Current guidelines recommend that aminoglycosides should be used in combination with β-lactam antibiotics as initial empirical therapy for serious infections, and otherwise, patients should receive β-lactam antibiotic monotherapy. Given the challenges associated with studying the clinical effect of different antibiotic strategies on patient outcomes, useful data for subsequent informed clinical testing can be obtained from in vitro models like the hollow-fiber infection model (HFIM). Based on the findings of our HFIM, we propose that the initial use of combination therapy with meropenem and amikacin provides some bacterial killing against carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa isolates. For susceptible isolates, combination therapy may only be of benefit in specific patient populations, such as critically ill or immunocompromised patients. Therefore, clinicians may want to consider using the combination therapy for the initial management and ceasing the aminoglycosides once antibiotic susceptibility results have been obtained. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9241727 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | American Society for Microbiology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92417272022-06-30 Evaluating Mono- and Combination Therapy of Meropenem and Amikacin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bacteremia in the Hollow-Fiber Infection Model Avent, Minyon L. McCarthy, Kate L. Sime, Fekade B. Naicker, Saiyuri Heffernan, Aaron J. Wallis, Steven C. Paterson, David L. Roberts, Jason A. Microbiol Spectr Research Article Debate continues as to the role of combination antibiotic therapy for the management of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. We studied the extent of bacterial killing by and the emergence of resistance to meropenem and amikacin as monotherapies and as a combination therapy against susceptible and resistant P. aeruginosa isolates from bacteremic patients using the dynamic in vitro hollow-fiber infection model. Three P. aeruginosa isolates (meropenem MICs of 0.125, 0.25, and 64 mg/L) were used, simulating bacteremia with an initial inoculum of ~1 × 10(5) CFU/mL and the expected pharmacokinetics of meropenem and amikacin in critically ill patients. For isolates susceptible to amikacin and meropenem (isolates 1 and 2), the extent of bacterial killing was increased with the combination regimen compared with the killing by monotherapy of either antibiotic. Both the combination and meropenem monotherapy were able to sustain bacterial killing throughout the 7-day treatment course, whereas regrowth of bacteria occurred with amikacin monotherapy after 12 h. For the meropenem-resistant P. aeruginosa isolate (isolate 3), only the combination regimen demonstrated bacterial killing. Given that tailored antibiotic regimens can maximize potential synergy against some isolates, future studies should explore the benefit of combination therapy against resistant P. aeruginosa. IMPORTANCE Current guidelines recommend that aminoglycosides should be used in combination with β-lactam antibiotics as initial empirical therapy for serious infections, and otherwise, patients should receive β-lactam antibiotic monotherapy. Given the challenges associated with studying the clinical effect of different antibiotic strategies on patient outcomes, useful data for subsequent informed clinical testing can be obtained from in vitro models like the hollow-fiber infection model (HFIM). Based on the findings of our HFIM, we propose that the initial use of combination therapy with meropenem and amikacin provides some bacterial killing against carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa isolates. For susceptible isolates, combination therapy may only be of benefit in specific patient populations, such as critically ill or immunocompromised patients. Therefore, clinicians may want to consider using the combination therapy for the initial management and ceasing the aminoglycosides once antibiotic susceptibility results have been obtained. American Society for Microbiology 2022-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9241727/ /pubmed/35442072 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.00525-22 Text en Copyright © 2022 Avent et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Article Avent, Minyon L. McCarthy, Kate L. Sime, Fekade B. Naicker, Saiyuri Heffernan, Aaron J. Wallis, Steven C. Paterson, David L. Roberts, Jason A. Evaluating Mono- and Combination Therapy of Meropenem and Amikacin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bacteremia in the Hollow-Fiber Infection Model |
title | Evaluating Mono- and Combination Therapy of Meropenem and Amikacin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bacteremia in the Hollow-Fiber Infection Model |
title_full | Evaluating Mono- and Combination Therapy of Meropenem and Amikacin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bacteremia in the Hollow-Fiber Infection Model |
title_fullStr | Evaluating Mono- and Combination Therapy of Meropenem and Amikacin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bacteremia in the Hollow-Fiber Infection Model |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating Mono- and Combination Therapy of Meropenem and Amikacin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bacteremia in the Hollow-Fiber Infection Model |
title_short | Evaluating Mono- and Combination Therapy of Meropenem and Amikacin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bacteremia in the Hollow-Fiber Infection Model |
title_sort | evaluating mono- and combination therapy of meropenem and amikacin against pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia in the hollow-fiber infection model |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9241727/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35442072 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.00525-22 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aventminyonl evaluatingmonoandcombinationtherapyofmeropenemandamikacinagainstpseudomonasaeruginosabacteremiainthehollowfiberinfectionmodel AT mccarthykatel evaluatingmonoandcombinationtherapyofmeropenemandamikacinagainstpseudomonasaeruginosabacteremiainthehollowfiberinfectionmodel AT simefekadeb evaluatingmonoandcombinationtherapyofmeropenemandamikacinagainstpseudomonasaeruginosabacteremiainthehollowfiberinfectionmodel AT naickersaiyuri evaluatingmonoandcombinationtherapyofmeropenemandamikacinagainstpseudomonasaeruginosabacteremiainthehollowfiberinfectionmodel AT heffernanaaronj evaluatingmonoandcombinationtherapyofmeropenemandamikacinagainstpseudomonasaeruginosabacteremiainthehollowfiberinfectionmodel AT wallisstevenc evaluatingmonoandcombinationtherapyofmeropenemandamikacinagainstpseudomonasaeruginosabacteremiainthehollowfiberinfectionmodel AT patersondavidl evaluatingmonoandcombinationtherapyofmeropenemandamikacinagainstpseudomonasaeruginosabacteremiainthehollowfiberinfectionmodel AT robertsjasona evaluatingmonoandcombinationtherapyofmeropenemandamikacinagainstpseudomonasaeruginosabacteremiainthehollowfiberinfectionmodel |