Cargando…

Evaluating Mono- and Combination Therapy of Meropenem and Amikacin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bacteremia in the Hollow-Fiber Infection Model

Debate continues as to the role of combination antibiotic therapy for the management of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. We studied the extent of bacterial killing by and the emergence of resistance to meropenem and amikacin as monotherapies and as a combination therapy against susceptible and res...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Avent, Minyon L., McCarthy, Kate L., Sime, Fekade B., Naicker, Saiyuri, Heffernan, Aaron J., Wallis, Steven C., Paterson, David L., Roberts, Jason A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society for Microbiology 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9241727/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35442072
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.00525-22
_version_ 1784737877014347776
author Avent, Minyon L.
McCarthy, Kate L.
Sime, Fekade B.
Naicker, Saiyuri
Heffernan, Aaron J.
Wallis, Steven C.
Paterson, David L.
Roberts, Jason A.
author_facet Avent, Minyon L.
McCarthy, Kate L.
Sime, Fekade B.
Naicker, Saiyuri
Heffernan, Aaron J.
Wallis, Steven C.
Paterson, David L.
Roberts, Jason A.
author_sort Avent, Minyon L.
collection PubMed
description Debate continues as to the role of combination antibiotic therapy for the management of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. We studied the extent of bacterial killing by and the emergence of resistance to meropenem and amikacin as monotherapies and as a combination therapy against susceptible and resistant P. aeruginosa isolates from bacteremic patients using the dynamic in vitro hollow-fiber infection model. Three P. aeruginosa isolates (meropenem MICs of 0.125, 0.25, and 64 mg/L) were used, simulating bacteremia with an initial inoculum of ~1 × 10(5) CFU/mL and the expected pharmacokinetics of meropenem and amikacin in critically ill patients. For isolates susceptible to amikacin and meropenem (isolates 1 and 2), the extent of bacterial killing was increased with the combination regimen compared with the killing by monotherapy of either antibiotic. Both the combination and meropenem monotherapy were able to sustain bacterial killing throughout the 7-day treatment course, whereas regrowth of bacteria occurred with amikacin monotherapy after 12 h. For the meropenem-resistant P. aeruginosa isolate (isolate 3), only the combination regimen demonstrated bacterial killing. Given that tailored antibiotic regimens can maximize potential synergy against some isolates, future studies should explore the benefit of combination therapy against resistant P. aeruginosa. IMPORTANCE Current guidelines recommend that aminoglycosides should be used in combination with β-lactam antibiotics as initial empirical therapy for serious infections, and otherwise, patients should receive β-lactam antibiotic monotherapy. Given the challenges associated with studying the clinical effect of different antibiotic strategies on patient outcomes, useful data for subsequent informed clinical testing can be obtained from in vitro models like the hollow-fiber infection model (HFIM). Based on the findings of our HFIM, we propose that the initial use of combination therapy with meropenem and amikacin provides some bacterial killing against carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa isolates. For susceptible isolates, combination therapy may only be of benefit in specific patient populations, such as critically ill or immunocompromised patients. Therefore, clinicians may want to consider using the combination therapy for the initial management and ceasing the aminoglycosides once antibiotic susceptibility results have been obtained.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9241727
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher American Society for Microbiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92417272022-06-30 Evaluating Mono- and Combination Therapy of Meropenem and Amikacin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bacteremia in the Hollow-Fiber Infection Model Avent, Minyon L. McCarthy, Kate L. Sime, Fekade B. Naicker, Saiyuri Heffernan, Aaron J. Wallis, Steven C. Paterson, David L. Roberts, Jason A. Microbiol Spectr Research Article Debate continues as to the role of combination antibiotic therapy for the management of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. We studied the extent of bacterial killing by and the emergence of resistance to meropenem and amikacin as monotherapies and as a combination therapy against susceptible and resistant P. aeruginosa isolates from bacteremic patients using the dynamic in vitro hollow-fiber infection model. Three P. aeruginosa isolates (meropenem MICs of 0.125, 0.25, and 64 mg/L) were used, simulating bacteremia with an initial inoculum of ~1 × 10(5) CFU/mL and the expected pharmacokinetics of meropenem and amikacin in critically ill patients. For isolates susceptible to amikacin and meropenem (isolates 1 and 2), the extent of bacterial killing was increased with the combination regimen compared with the killing by monotherapy of either antibiotic. Both the combination and meropenem monotherapy were able to sustain bacterial killing throughout the 7-day treatment course, whereas regrowth of bacteria occurred with amikacin monotherapy after 12 h. For the meropenem-resistant P. aeruginosa isolate (isolate 3), only the combination regimen demonstrated bacterial killing. Given that tailored antibiotic regimens can maximize potential synergy against some isolates, future studies should explore the benefit of combination therapy against resistant P. aeruginosa. IMPORTANCE Current guidelines recommend that aminoglycosides should be used in combination with β-lactam antibiotics as initial empirical therapy for serious infections, and otherwise, patients should receive β-lactam antibiotic monotherapy. Given the challenges associated with studying the clinical effect of different antibiotic strategies on patient outcomes, useful data for subsequent informed clinical testing can be obtained from in vitro models like the hollow-fiber infection model (HFIM). Based on the findings of our HFIM, we propose that the initial use of combination therapy with meropenem and amikacin provides some bacterial killing against carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa isolates. For susceptible isolates, combination therapy may only be of benefit in specific patient populations, such as critically ill or immunocompromised patients. Therefore, clinicians may want to consider using the combination therapy for the initial management and ceasing the aminoglycosides once antibiotic susceptibility results have been obtained. American Society for Microbiology 2022-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9241727/ /pubmed/35442072 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.00525-22 Text en Copyright © 2022 Avent et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research Article
Avent, Minyon L.
McCarthy, Kate L.
Sime, Fekade B.
Naicker, Saiyuri
Heffernan, Aaron J.
Wallis, Steven C.
Paterson, David L.
Roberts, Jason A.
Evaluating Mono- and Combination Therapy of Meropenem and Amikacin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bacteremia in the Hollow-Fiber Infection Model
title Evaluating Mono- and Combination Therapy of Meropenem and Amikacin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bacteremia in the Hollow-Fiber Infection Model
title_full Evaluating Mono- and Combination Therapy of Meropenem and Amikacin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bacteremia in the Hollow-Fiber Infection Model
title_fullStr Evaluating Mono- and Combination Therapy of Meropenem and Amikacin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bacteremia in the Hollow-Fiber Infection Model
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating Mono- and Combination Therapy of Meropenem and Amikacin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bacteremia in the Hollow-Fiber Infection Model
title_short Evaluating Mono- and Combination Therapy of Meropenem and Amikacin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bacteremia in the Hollow-Fiber Infection Model
title_sort evaluating mono- and combination therapy of meropenem and amikacin against pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia in the hollow-fiber infection model
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9241727/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35442072
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.00525-22
work_keys_str_mv AT aventminyonl evaluatingmonoandcombinationtherapyofmeropenemandamikacinagainstpseudomonasaeruginosabacteremiainthehollowfiberinfectionmodel
AT mccarthykatel evaluatingmonoandcombinationtherapyofmeropenemandamikacinagainstpseudomonasaeruginosabacteremiainthehollowfiberinfectionmodel
AT simefekadeb evaluatingmonoandcombinationtherapyofmeropenemandamikacinagainstpseudomonasaeruginosabacteremiainthehollowfiberinfectionmodel
AT naickersaiyuri evaluatingmonoandcombinationtherapyofmeropenemandamikacinagainstpseudomonasaeruginosabacteremiainthehollowfiberinfectionmodel
AT heffernanaaronj evaluatingmonoandcombinationtherapyofmeropenemandamikacinagainstpseudomonasaeruginosabacteremiainthehollowfiberinfectionmodel
AT wallisstevenc evaluatingmonoandcombinationtherapyofmeropenemandamikacinagainstpseudomonasaeruginosabacteremiainthehollowfiberinfectionmodel
AT patersondavidl evaluatingmonoandcombinationtherapyofmeropenemandamikacinagainstpseudomonasaeruginosabacteremiainthehollowfiberinfectionmodel
AT robertsjasona evaluatingmonoandcombinationtherapyofmeropenemandamikacinagainstpseudomonasaeruginosabacteremiainthehollowfiberinfectionmodel