Cargando…

Affinity of disordered protein complexes is modulated by entropy–energy reinforcement

The association between two intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) may produce a fuzzy complex characterized by a high binding affinity, similar to that found in the ultrastable complexes formed between two well-structured proteins. Here, using coarse-grained simulations, we quantified the biophys...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hazra, Milan Kumar, Levy, Yaakov
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: National Academy of Sciences 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9245678/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35727975
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2120456119
_version_ 1784738797040173056
author Hazra, Milan Kumar
Levy, Yaakov
author_facet Hazra, Milan Kumar
Levy, Yaakov
author_sort Hazra, Milan Kumar
collection PubMed
description The association between two intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) may produce a fuzzy complex characterized by a high binding affinity, similar to that found in the ultrastable complexes formed between two well-structured proteins. Here, using coarse-grained simulations, we quantified the biophysical forces driving the formation of such fuzzy complexes. We found that the high-affinity complex formed between the highly and oppositely charged H1 and ProTα proteins is sensitive to electrostatic interactions. We investigated 52 variants of the complex by swapping charges between the two oppositely charged proteins to produce sequences whose negatively or positively charged residue content was more homogeneous or heterogenous (i.e., polyelectrolytic or polyampholytic, having higher or lower absolute net charges, respectively) than the wild type. We also changed the distributions of oppositely charged residues within each participating sequence to produce variants in which the charges were segregated or well mixed. Both types of changes significantly affect binding affinity in fuzzy complexes, which is governed by both enthalpy and entropy. The formation of H1–ProTa is supported by an increase in configurational entropy and by entropy due to counterion release. The latter can be twice as large as the former, illustrating the dominance of counterion entropy in modulating the binding thermodynamics. Complexes formed between proteins with greater absolute net charges are more stable, both enthalpically and entropically, indicating that enthalpy and entropy have a mutually reinforcing effect. The sensitivity of the thermodynamics of the complex to net charge and the charge pattern within each of the binding constituents may provide a means to achieve binding specificity between IDPs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9245678
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher National Academy of Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92456782022-07-01 Affinity of disordered protein complexes is modulated by entropy–energy reinforcement Hazra, Milan Kumar Levy, Yaakov Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Biological Sciences The association between two intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) may produce a fuzzy complex characterized by a high binding affinity, similar to that found in the ultrastable complexes formed between two well-structured proteins. Here, using coarse-grained simulations, we quantified the biophysical forces driving the formation of such fuzzy complexes. We found that the high-affinity complex formed between the highly and oppositely charged H1 and ProTα proteins is sensitive to electrostatic interactions. We investigated 52 variants of the complex by swapping charges between the two oppositely charged proteins to produce sequences whose negatively or positively charged residue content was more homogeneous or heterogenous (i.e., polyelectrolytic or polyampholytic, having higher or lower absolute net charges, respectively) than the wild type. We also changed the distributions of oppositely charged residues within each participating sequence to produce variants in which the charges were segregated or well mixed. Both types of changes significantly affect binding affinity in fuzzy complexes, which is governed by both enthalpy and entropy. The formation of H1–ProTa is supported by an increase in configurational entropy and by entropy due to counterion release. The latter can be twice as large as the former, illustrating the dominance of counterion entropy in modulating the binding thermodynamics. Complexes formed between proteins with greater absolute net charges are more stable, both enthalpically and entropically, indicating that enthalpy and entropy have a mutually reinforcing effect. The sensitivity of the thermodynamics of the complex to net charge and the charge pattern within each of the binding constituents may provide a means to achieve binding specificity between IDPs. National Academy of Sciences 2022-06-21 2022-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9245678/ /pubmed/35727975 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2120456119 Text en Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by PNAS. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Biological Sciences
Hazra, Milan Kumar
Levy, Yaakov
Affinity of disordered protein complexes is modulated by entropy–energy reinforcement
title Affinity of disordered protein complexes is modulated by entropy–energy reinforcement
title_full Affinity of disordered protein complexes is modulated by entropy–energy reinforcement
title_fullStr Affinity of disordered protein complexes is modulated by entropy–energy reinforcement
title_full_unstemmed Affinity of disordered protein complexes is modulated by entropy–energy reinforcement
title_short Affinity of disordered protein complexes is modulated by entropy–energy reinforcement
title_sort affinity of disordered protein complexes is modulated by entropy–energy reinforcement
topic Biological Sciences
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9245678/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35727975
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2120456119
work_keys_str_mv AT hazramilankumar affinityofdisorderedproteincomplexesismodulatedbyentropyenergyreinforcement
AT levyyaakov affinityofdisorderedproteincomplexesismodulatedbyentropyenergyreinforcement