Cargando…
Integrating Critical Approaches into Quantitative STEM Equity Work
The recent anti-racist movements in the United States have inspired a national call for more research on the experiences of racially marginalized and minoritized students in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields. As researchers focused on promoting diversity, equity, and in...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Society for Cell Biology
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9250366/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35100005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.21-06-0158 |
_version_ | 1784739798771040256 |
---|---|
author | Pearson, Meaghan I. Castle, Sarah D. Matz, Rebecca L. Koester, Benjamin P. Byrd, W. Carson |
author_facet | Pearson, Meaghan I. Castle, Sarah D. Matz, Rebecca L. Koester, Benjamin P. Byrd, W. Carson |
author_sort | Pearson, Meaghan I. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The recent anti-racist movements in the United States have inspired a national call for more research on the experiences of racially marginalized and minoritized students in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields. As researchers focused on promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion, we contend that STEM education must, as a discipline, grapple with how analytic approaches may not fully support equity efforts. We discuss how researchers and educational practitioners should more critically approach STEM equity analyses and why modifying our approaches matters for STEM equity goals. Engaging with equity as a process rather than a static goal, we provide a primer of reflective questions to assist researchers with framing, analysis, and interpretation of student-level data frequently used to identify disparities and assess course-level and programmatic interventions. This guidance can inform analyses conducted by campus units such as departments and programs, but also across universities and the scientific community to enhance how we understand and address systemic inequity in STEM fields. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9250366 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | American Society for Cell Biology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92503662022-07-06 Integrating Critical Approaches into Quantitative STEM Equity Work Pearson, Meaghan I. Castle, Sarah D. Matz, Rebecca L. Koester, Benjamin P. Byrd, W. Carson CBE Life Sci Educ General Essays and Articles The recent anti-racist movements in the United States have inspired a national call for more research on the experiences of racially marginalized and minoritized students in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields. As researchers focused on promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion, we contend that STEM education must, as a discipline, grapple with how analytic approaches may not fully support equity efforts. We discuss how researchers and educational practitioners should more critically approach STEM equity analyses and why modifying our approaches matters for STEM equity goals. Engaging with equity as a process rather than a static goal, we provide a primer of reflective questions to assist researchers with framing, analysis, and interpretation of student-level data frequently used to identify disparities and assess course-level and programmatic interventions. This guidance can inform analyses conducted by campus units such as departments and programs, but also across universities and the scientific community to enhance how we understand and address systemic inequity in STEM fields. American Society for Cell Biology 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9250366/ /pubmed/35100005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.21-06-0158 Text en © 2022 M. I. Pearson et al. CBE—Life Sciences Education © 2022 The American Society for Cell Biology. “ASCB®” and “The American Society for Cell Biology®” are registered trademarks of The American Society for Cell Biology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This article is distributed by The American Society for Cell Biology under license from the author(s). It is available to the public under an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 4.0 Unported Creative Commons License. |
spellingShingle | General Essays and Articles Pearson, Meaghan I. Castle, Sarah D. Matz, Rebecca L. Koester, Benjamin P. Byrd, W. Carson Integrating Critical Approaches into Quantitative STEM Equity Work |
title | Integrating Critical Approaches into Quantitative STEM Equity Work |
title_full | Integrating Critical Approaches into Quantitative STEM Equity Work |
title_fullStr | Integrating Critical Approaches into Quantitative STEM Equity Work |
title_full_unstemmed | Integrating Critical Approaches into Quantitative STEM Equity Work |
title_short | Integrating Critical Approaches into Quantitative STEM Equity Work |
title_sort | integrating critical approaches into quantitative stem equity work |
topic | General Essays and Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9250366/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35100005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.21-06-0158 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pearsonmeaghani integratingcriticalapproachesintoquantitativestemequitywork AT castlesarahd integratingcriticalapproachesintoquantitativestemequitywork AT matzrebeccal integratingcriticalapproachesintoquantitativestemequitywork AT koesterbenjaminp integratingcriticalapproachesintoquantitativestemequitywork AT byrdwcarson integratingcriticalapproachesintoquantitativestemequitywork |