Cargando…

Integrating Critical Approaches into Quantitative STEM Equity Work

The recent anti-racist movements in the United States have inspired a national call for more research on the experiences of racially marginalized and minoritized students in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields. As researchers focused on promoting diversity, equity, and in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pearson, Meaghan I., Castle, Sarah D., Matz, Rebecca L., Koester, Benjamin P., Byrd, W. Carson
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society for Cell Biology 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9250366/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35100005
http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.21-06-0158
_version_ 1784739798771040256
author Pearson, Meaghan I.
Castle, Sarah D.
Matz, Rebecca L.
Koester, Benjamin P.
Byrd, W. Carson
author_facet Pearson, Meaghan I.
Castle, Sarah D.
Matz, Rebecca L.
Koester, Benjamin P.
Byrd, W. Carson
author_sort Pearson, Meaghan I.
collection PubMed
description The recent anti-racist movements in the United States have inspired a national call for more research on the experiences of racially marginalized and minoritized students in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields. As researchers focused on promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion, we contend that STEM education must, as a discipline, grapple with how analytic approaches may not fully support equity efforts. We discuss how researchers and educational practitioners should more critically approach STEM equity analyses and why modifying our approaches matters for STEM equity goals. Engaging with equity as a process rather than a static goal, we provide a primer of reflective questions to assist researchers with framing, analysis, and interpretation of student-level data frequently used to identify disparities and assess course-level and programmatic interventions. This guidance can inform analyses conducted by campus units such as departments and programs, but also across universities and the scientific community to enhance how we understand and address systemic inequity in STEM fields.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9250366
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher American Society for Cell Biology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92503662022-07-06 Integrating Critical Approaches into Quantitative STEM Equity Work Pearson, Meaghan I. Castle, Sarah D. Matz, Rebecca L. Koester, Benjamin P. Byrd, W. Carson CBE Life Sci Educ General Essays and Articles The recent anti-racist movements in the United States have inspired a national call for more research on the experiences of racially marginalized and minoritized students in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields. As researchers focused on promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion, we contend that STEM education must, as a discipline, grapple with how analytic approaches may not fully support equity efforts. We discuss how researchers and educational practitioners should more critically approach STEM equity analyses and why modifying our approaches matters for STEM equity goals. Engaging with equity as a process rather than a static goal, we provide a primer of reflective questions to assist researchers with framing, analysis, and interpretation of student-level data frequently used to identify disparities and assess course-level and programmatic interventions. This guidance can inform analyses conducted by campus units such as departments and programs, but also across universities and the scientific community to enhance how we understand and address systemic inequity in STEM fields. American Society for Cell Biology 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9250366/ /pubmed/35100005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.21-06-0158 Text en © 2022 M. I. Pearson et al. CBE—Life Sciences Education © 2022 The American Society for Cell Biology. “ASCB®” and “The American Society for Cell Biology®” are registered trademarks of The American Society for Cell Biology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This article is distributed by The American Society for Cell Biology under license from the author(s). It is available to the public under an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 4.0 Unported Creative Commons License.
spellingShingle General Essays and Articles
Pearson, Meaghan I.
Castle, Sarah D.
Matz, Rebecca L.
Koester, Benjamin P.
Byrd, W. Carson
Integrating Critical Approaches into Quantitative STEM Equity Work
title Integrating Critical Approaches into Quantitative STEM Equity Work
title_full Integrating Critical Approaches into Quantitative STEM Equity Work
title_fullStr Integrating Critical Approaches into Quantitative STEM Equity Work
title_full_unstemmed Integrating Critical Approaches into Quantitative STEM Equity Work
title_short Integrating Critical Approaches into Quantitative STEM Equity Work
title_sort integrating critical approaches into quantitative stem equity work
topic General Essays and Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9250366/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35100005
http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.21-06-0158
work_keys_str_mv AT pearsonmeaghani integratingcriticalapproachesintoquantitativestemequitywork
AT castlesarahd integratingcriticalapproachesintoquantitativestemequitywork
AT matzrebeccal integratingcriticalapproachesintoquantitativestemequitywork
AT koesterbenjaminp integratingcriticalapproachesintoquantitativestemequitywork
AT byrdwcarson integratingcriticalapproachesintoquantitativestemequitywork