Cargando…
Early introduction of the multi-disciplinary team through student Schwartz Rounds: a mixed methodology study
BACKGROUND: Medical education has changed continually throughout the covid-19 pandemic, creating additional stress for medical students. Personal reflection can empower an individual to adapt to new challenges, and reflection has gradually become incorporated into medical student training. Schwartz...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9250992/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35786176 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03549-7 |
_version_ | 1784739936500449280 |
---|---|
author | Abnett, Harry Tuckwell, Robert Evans, Lucy |
author_facet | Abnett, Harry Tuckwell, Robert Evans, Lucy |
author_sort | Abnett, Harry |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Medical education has changed continually throughout the covid-19 pandemic, creating additional stress for medical students. Personal reflection can empower an individual to adapt to new challenges, and reflection has gradually become incorporated into medical student training. Schwartz Rounds (SR) offer a compassionate group reflective forum for healthcare staff. SRs have been extensively introduced throughout the NHS, however medical student rounds are yet to be widely adopted. Entirely unresearched is how the multi-disciplinary team impacts a medical student SR. This study aims to compare medical student experience of a single-discipline and a multi-discipline SR using mixed methodology. METHODS: Two virtual SRs were run at an NHS district general hospital, using the existing structure of the Trust’s rounds. The first round included only medical students on placement at the hospital, whereas the second round also involved other student health disciplines. Following each round Likert scale questionnaires were collected, and focus groups were held with a small number of participants. Quantitative analysis used median averages as well direct comparison of scores for each round. Qualitative data from the focus groups underwent thematic analysis. RESULTS: The quantitative data showed a positive response to both styles of student SRs, with over 87% of participants at both rounds stating they intended to attend further rounds. Direct comparison between the two rounds showed higher feedback scores for the single-discipline round. Qualitative analysis showed strong student interest in further group reflection, noting the value of SRs in improving workplace culture and inter-professional relationships. The analysis also highlighted frustrations with the existing SR structure, namely large group sizes and scripted panellists. CONCLUSIONS: Both data sets showed a strong positive response to SRs, and a desire to attend again. There is some evidence to suggest the addition of multiple student disciplines at SRs impaired medical student reflection. Changes to the format of the round could result in even greater success in student rounds. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9250992 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92509922022-07-05 Early introduction of the multi-disciplinary team through student Schwartz Rounds: a mixed methodology study Abnett, Harry Tuckwell, Robert Evans, Lucy BMC Med Educ Research BACKGROUND: Medical education has changed continually throughout the covid-19 pandemic, creating additional stress for medical students. Personal reflection can empower an individual to adapt to new challenges, and reflection has gradually become incorporated into medical student training. Schwartz Rounds (SR) offer a compassionate group reflective forum for healthcare staff. SRs have been extensively introduced throughout the NHS, however medical student rounds are yet to be widely adopted. Entirely unresearched is how the multi-disciplinary team impacts a medical student SR. This study aims to compare medical student experience of a single-discipline and a multi-discipline SR using mixed methodology. METHODS: Two virtual SRs were run at an NHS district general hospital, using the existing structure of the Trust’s rounds. The first round included only medical students on placement at the hospital, whereas the second round also involved other student health disciplines. Following each round Likert scale questionnaires were collected, and focus groups were held with a small number of participants. Quantitative analysis used median averages as well direct comparison of scores for each round. Qualitative data from the focus groups underwent thematic analysis. RESULTS: The quantitative data showed a positive response to both styles of student SRs, with over 87% of participants at both rounds stating they intended to attend further rounds. Direct comparison between the two rounds showed higher feedback scores for the single-discipline round. Qualitative analysis showed strong student interest in further group reflection, noting the value of SRs in improving workplace culture and inter-professional relationships. The analysis also highlighted frustrations with the existing SR structure, namely large group sizes and scripted panellists. CONCLUSIONS: Both data sets showed a strong positive response to SRs, and a desire to attend again. There is some evidence to suggest the addition of multiple student disciplines at SRs impaired medical student reflection. Changes to the format of the round could result in even greater success in student rounds. BioMed Central 2022-07-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9250992/ /pubmed/35786176 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03549-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Abnett, Harry Tuckwell, Robert Evans, Lucy Early introduction of the multi-disciplinary team through student Schwartz Rounds: a mixed methodology study |
title | Early introduction of the multi-disciplinary team through student Schwartz Rounds: a mixed methodology study |
title_full | Early introduction of the multi-disciplinary team through student Schwartz Rounds: a mixed methodology study |
title_fullStr | Early introduction of the multi-disciplinary team through student Schwartz Rounds: a mixed methodology study |
title_full_unstemmed | Early introduction of the multi-disciplinary team through student Schwartz Rounds: a mixed methodology study |
title_short | Early introduction of the multi-disciplinary team through student Schwartz Rounds: a mixed methodology study |
title_sort | early introduction of the multi-disciplinary team through student schwartz rounds: a mixed methodology study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9250992/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35786176 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03549-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT abnettharry earlyintroductionofthemultidisciplinaryteamthroughstudentschwartzroundsamixedmethodologystudy AT tuckwellrobert earlyintroductionofthemultidisciplinaryteamthroughstudentschwartzroundsamixedmethodologystudy AT evanslucy earlyintroductionofthemultidisciplinaryteamthroughstudentschwartzroundsamixedmethodologystudy |