Cargando…

Assessment of blinding in randomized controlled trials of antidepressants for depressive disorders 2000–2020: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: In double-blind randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of antidepressants, blinding can be broken due to the apparent side effects, and unsuccessful blinding can lead to overestimation of effect sizes. New generation antidepressants with less severe side effects may be less susceptible to b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lin, Yi-Hsuan, Sahker, Ethan, Shinohara, Kiyomi, Horinouchi, Noboru, Ito, Masami, Lelliott, Madoka, Cipriani, Andrea, Tomlinson, Anneka, Baethge, Christopher, Furukawa, Toshi A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9257339/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35812993
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101505
_version_ 1784741326230650880
author Lin, Yi-Hsuan
Sahker, Ethan
Shinohara, Kiyomi
Horinouchi, Noboru
Ito, Masami
Lelliott, Madoka
Cipriani, Andrea
Tomlinson, Anneka
Baethge, Christopher
Furukawa, Toshi A.
author_facet Lin, Yi-Hsuan
Sahker, Ethan
Shinohara, Kiyomi
Horinouchi, Noboru
Ito, Masami
Lelliott, Madoka
Cipriani, Andrea
Tomlinson, Anneka
Baethge, Christopher
Furukawa, Toshi A.
author_sort Lin, Yi-Hsuan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In double-blind randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of antidepressants, blinding can be broken due to the apparent side effects, and unsuccessful blinding can lead to overestimation of effect sizes. New generation antidepressants with less severe side effects may be less susceptible to broken blinding. However, successfulness of blinding in new generation antidepressant trials and its influence on trial effect size estimates remain unclear. METHODS: Extending a previous systematic review assessing blinding successfulness in psychiatric trials (2000-2010), we searched PubMed/Medline for double-blinded antidepressant RCTs (2010-2020) for trials assessing blinding success. Our primary outcome was the degree of blinding successfulness, measured as kappa statistics between guesses and true allocations. We used random-effects meta-analysis to synthesize studies. We used meta-regression and Pearson's r to examine the relationship between blinding success and effect sizes. This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021249973). FINDINGS: Among 154 eligible studies, 11 (7·1%) contained information on blinding assessment between 2010 and 2020. Five studies were added from the previous review, and altogether nine of the 16 studies provided usable data. Agreement in individual studies ranged from κ=-0·14 to 0·38. The summary agreement between guesses and the truth was 0·21 (95% CI: 0·14 to 0·28) among patients and 0·17 (95% CI: 0·05 to 0·30) among assessors. Blinding success was not associated with effect size (patients: r = 0·37, p = 0·32; assessors: r = 0·28; p = 0·72). Meta-regression also failed to find a significant relationship between blinding success and depression effect sizes (β=0·06, p = 0·09). INTERPRETATION: Less than 10% of the antidepressant RCTs reported blinding assessment. The results in new generation antidepressant trials indicated that patients and assessors were unlikely to be able to judge treatment allocation. There was little evidence that the extent of unblinding biased the effect size estimates of new generation antidepressants. FUNDING: None.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9257339
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92573392022-07-07 Assessment of blinding in randomized controlled trials of antidepressants for depressive disorders 2000–2020: A systematic review and meta-analysis Lin, Yi-Hsuan Sahker, Ethan Shinohara, Kiyomi Horinouchi, Noboru Ito, Masami Lelliott, Madoka Cipriani, Andrea Tomlinson, Anneka Baethge, Christopher Furukawa, Toshi A. eClinicalMedicine Articles BACKGROUND: In double-blind randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of antidepressants, blinding can be broken due to the apparent side effects, and unsuccessful blinding can lead to overestimation of effect sizes. New generation antidepressants with less severe side effects may be less susceptible to broken blinding. However, successfulness of blinding in new generation antidepressant trials and its influence on trial effect size estimates remain unclear. METHODS: Extending a previous systematic review assessing blinding successfulness in psychiatric trials (2000-2010), we searched PubMed/Medline for double-blinded antidepressant RCTs (2010-2020) for trials assessing blinding success. Our primary outcome was the degree of blinding successfulness, measured as kappa statistics between guesses and true allocations. We used random-effects meta-analysis to synthesize studies. We used meta-regression and Pearson's r to examine the relationship between blinding success and effect sizes. This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021249973). FINDINGS: Among 154 eligible studies, 11 (7·1%) contained information on blinding assessment between 2010 and 2020. Five studies were added from the previous review, and altogether nine of the 16 studies provided usable data. Agreement in individual studies ranged from κ=-0·14 to 0·38. The summary agreement between guesses and the truth was 0·21 (95% CI: 0·14 to 0·28) among patients and 0·17 (95% CI: 0·05 to 0·30) among assessors. Blinding success was not associated with effect size (patients: r = 0·37, p = 0·32; assessors: r = 0·28; p = 0·72). Meta-regression also failed to find a significant relationship between blinding success and depression effect sizes (β=0·06, p = 0·09). INTERPRETATION: Less than 10% of the antidepressant RCTs reported blinding assessment. The results in new generation antidepressant trials indicated that patients and assessors were unlikely to be able to judge treatment allocation. There was little evidence that the extent of unblinding biased the effect size estimates of new generation antidepressants. FUNDING: None. Elsevier 2022-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9257339/ /pubmed/35812993 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101505 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Articles
Lin, Yi-Hsuan
Sahker, Ethan
Shinohara, Kiyomi
Horinouchi, Noboru
Ito, Masami
Lelliott, Madoka
Cipriani, Andrea
Tomlinson, Anneka
Baethge, Christopher
Furukawa, Toshi A.
Assessment of blinding in randomized controlled trials of antidepressants for depressive disorders 2000–2020: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Assessment of blinding in randomized controlled trials of antidepressants for depressive disorders 2000–2020: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Assessment of blinding in randomized controlled trials of antidepressants for depressive disorders 2000–2020: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Assessment of blinding in randomized controlled trials of antidepressants for depressive disorders 2000–2020: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of blinding in randomized controlled trials of antidepressants for depressive disorders 2000–2020: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Assessment of blinding in randomized controlled trials of antidepressants for depressive disorders 2000–2020: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort assessment of blinding in randomized controlled trials of antidepressants for depressive disorders 2000–2020: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9257339/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35812993
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101505
work_keys_str_mv AT linyihsuan assessmentofblindinginrandomizedcontrolledtrialsofantidepressantsfordepressivedisorders20002020asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT sahkerethan assessmentofblindinginrandomizedcontrolledtrialsofantidepressantsfordepressivedisorders20002020asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shinoharakiyomi assessmentofblindinginrandomizedcontrolledtrialsofantidepressantsfordepressivedisorders20002020asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT horinouchinoboru assessmentofblindinginrandomizedcontrolledtrialsofantidepressantsfordepressivedisorders20002020asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT itomasami assessmentofblindinginrandomizedcontrolledtrialsofantidepressantsfordepressivedisorders20002020asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lelliottmadoka assessmentofblindinginrandomizedcontrolledtrialsofantidepressantsfordepressivedisorders20002020asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ciprianiandrea assessmentofblindinginrandomizedcontrolledtrialsofantidepressantsfordepressivedisorders20002020asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT tomlinsonanneka assessmentofblindinginrandomizedcontrolledtrialsofantidepressantsfordepressivedisorders20002020asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT baethgechristopher assessmentofblindinginrandomizedcontrolledtrialsofantidepressantsfordepressivedisorders20002020asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT furukawatoshia assessmentofblindinginrandomizedcontrolledtrialsofantidepressantsfordepressivedisorders20002020asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis