Cargando…
Systematic analysis of intrinsic enhancer-promoter compatibility in the mouse genome
Gene expression is in part controlled by cis-regulatory elements (CREs) such as enhancers and repressive elements. Anecdotal evidence has indicated that a CRE and a promoter need to be biochemically compatible for promoter regulation to occur, but this compatibility has remained poorly characterized...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cell Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9278412/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35594855 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2022.04.009 |
_version_ | 1784746180855463936 |
---|---|
author | Martinez-Ara, Miguel Comoglio, Federico van Arensbergen, Joris van Steensel, Bas |
author_facet | Martinez-Ara, Miguel Comoglio, Federico van Arensbergen, Joris van Steensel, Bas |
author_sort | Martinez-Ara, Miguel |
collection | PubMed |
description | Gene expression is in part controlled by cis-regulatory elements (CREs) such as enhancers and repressive elements. Anecdotal evidence has indicated that a CRE and a promoter need to be biochemically compatible for promoter regulation to occur, but this compatibility has remained poorly characterized in mammalian cells. We used high-throughput combinatorial reporter assays to test thousands of CRE-promoter pairs from three Mb-sized genomic regions in mouse cells. This revealed that CREs vary substantially in their promoter compatibility, ranging from striking specificity to broad promiscuity. More than half of the tested CREs exhibit significant promoter selectivity. Housekeeping promoters tend to have similar CRE preferences, but other promoters exhibit a wide diversity of compatibilities. Higher-order transcription factors (TF) motif combinations may account for compatibility. CRE-promoter selectivity does not correlate with looping interactions in the native genomic context, suggesting that chromatin folding and compatibility are two orthogonal mechanisms that confer specificity to gene regulation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9278412 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Cell Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92784122022-07-15 Systematic analysis of intrinsic enhancer-promoter compatibility in the mouse genome Martinez-Ara, Miguel Comoglio, Federico van Arensbergen, Joris van Steensel, Bas Mol Cell Article Gene expression is in part controlled by cis-regulatory elements (CREs) such as enhancers and repressive elements. Anecdotal evidence has indicated that a CRE and a promoter need to be biochemically compatible for promoter regulation to occur, but this compatibility has remained poorly characterized in mammalian cells. We used high-throughput combinatorial reporter assays to test thousands of CRE-promoter pairs from three Mb-sized genomic regions in mouse cells. This revealed that CREs vary substantially in their promoter compatibility, ranging from striking specificity to broad promiscuity. More than half of the tested CREs exhibit significant promoter selectivity. Housekeeping promoters tend to have similar CRE preferences, but other promoters exhibit a wide diversity of compatibilities. Higher-order transcription factors (TF) motif combinations may account for compatibility. CRE-promoter selectivity does not correlate with looping interactions in the native genomic context, suggesting that chromatin folding and compatibility are two orthogonal mechanisms that confer specificity to gene regulation. Cell Press 2022-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9278412/ /pubmed/35594855 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2022.04.009 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Martinez-Ara, Miguel Comoglio, Federico van Arensbergen, Joris van Steensel, Bas Systematic analysis of intrinsic enhancer-promoter compatibility in the mouse genome |
title | Systematic analysis of intrinsic enhancer-promoter compatibility in the mouse genome |
title_full | Systematic analysis of intrinsic enhancer-promoter compatibility in the mouse genome |
title_fullStr | Systematic analysis of intrinsic enhancer-promoter compatibility in the mouse genome |
title_full_unstemmed | Systematic analysis of intrinsic enhancer-promoter compatibility in the mouse genome |
title_short | Systematic analysis of intrinsic enhancer-promoter compatibility in the mouse genome |
title_sort | systematic analysis of intrinsic enhancer-promoter compatibility in the mouse genome |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9278412/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35594855 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2022.04.009 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT martinezaramiguel systematicanalysisofintrinsicenhancerpromotercompatibilityinthemousegenome AT comogliofederico systematicanalysisofintrinsicenhancerpromotercompatibilityinthemousegenome AT vanarensbergenjoris systematicanalysisofintrinsicenhancerpromotercompatibilityinthemousegenome AT vansteenselbas systematicanalysisofintrinsicenhancerpromotercompatibilityinthemousegenome |