Cargando…
Holistic antenatal education class interventions: a systematic review of the prioritisation and involvement of Indigenous Peoples’ of Aotearoa New Zealand, Australia, Canada and the United States over a 10-year period 2008 to 2018
BACKGROUND: Research into the effectiveness of antenatal education classes is crucial for Indigenous Peoples from Aotearoa New Zealand, Australia, Canada and the United States who experience poorer maternal and infant health outcomes compared to non-Indigenous populations. Our systematic review ques...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9281049/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35836247 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13690-022-00927-x |
_version_ | 1784746790771228672 |
---|---|
author | Barrett, Nikki M. Burrows, Lisette Atatoa-Carr, Polly Smith, Linda T. Masters-Awatere, Bridgette |
author_facet | Barrett, Nikki M. Burrows, Lisette Atatoa-Carr, Polly Smith, Linda T. Masters-Awatere, Bridgette |
author_sort | Barrett, Nikki M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Research into the effectiveness of antenatal education classes is crucial for Indigenous Peoples from Aotearoa New Zealand, Australia, Canada and the United States who experience poorer maternal and infant health outcomes compared to non-Indigenous populations. Our systematic review questions were intended to determine the extent of Indigenous Peoples prioritisation and involvement in antenatal education classes, and to understand the experience of Indigenous Peoples from these countries in antenatal education classes. METHODS: Using a standardised protocol, we systematically searched five electronic databases for primary research papers on antenatal education classes within the four countries noted and identified 17 papers that met the criteria. We undertook a qualitative meta-synthesis using a socio-critical lens. RESULTS: Systematic review of the academic literature demonstrates that Indigenous Peoples of Aotearoa New Zealand, Australia, Canada and the United States are not prioritised in antenatal education classes with only two of 17 studies identifying Indigenous participants. Within these two studies, Indigenous Peoples were underrepresented. As a result of poor engagement and low participation numbers of Indigenous Peoples in these antenatal education classes, it was not possible to understand the experiences of Indigenous Peoples. CONCLUSION: Given that Indigenous Peoples were absent from the majority of studies examined in this review, it is clear little consideration is afforded to the antenatal health needs and aspirations of Indigenous Peoples of Aotearoa New Zealand, Australia, Canada and the United States. To address the stark antenatal health inequities of Indigenous Peoples, targeted Indigenous interventions that consider culture, language, and wider aspects of holistic health must be privileged. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO Registration ID: CRD4202017658 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9281049 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92810492022-07-15 Holistic antenatal education class interventions: a systematic review of the prioritisation and involvement of Indigenous Peoples’ of Aotearoa New Zealand, Australia, Canada and the United States over a 10-year period 2008 to 2018 Barrett, Nikki M. Burrows, Lisette Atatoa-Carr, Polly Smith, Linda T. Masters-Awatere, Bridgette Arch Public Health Systematic Review BACKGROUND: Research into the effectiveness of antenatal education classes is crucial for Indigenous Peoples from Aotearoa New Zealand, Australia, Canada and the United States who experience poorer maternal and infant health outcomes compared to non-Indigenous populations. Our systematic review questions were intended to determine the extent of Indigenous Peoples prioritisation and involvement in antenatal education classes, and to understand the experience of Indigenous Peoples from these countries in antenatal education classes. METHODS: Using a standardised protocol, we systematically searched five electronic databases for primary research papers on antenatal education classes within the four countries noted and identified 17 papers that met the criteria. We undertook a qualitative meta-synthesis using a socio-critical lens. RESULTS: Systematic review of the academic literature demonstrates that Indigenous Peoples of Aotearoa New Zealand, Australia, Canada and the United States are not prioritised in antenatal education classes with only two of 17 studies identifying Indigenous participants. Within these two studies, Indigenous Peoples were underrepresented. As a result of poor engagement and low participation numbers of Indigenous Peoples in these antenatal education classes, it was not possible to understand the experiences of Indigenous Peoples. CONCLUSION: Given that Indigenous Peoples were absent from the majority of studies examined in this review, it is clear little consideration is afforded to the antenatal health needs and aspirations of Indigenous Peoples of Aotearoa New Zealand, Australia, Canada and the United States. To address the stark antenatal health inequities of Indigenous Peoples, targeted Indigenous interventions that consider culture, language, and wider aspects of holistic health must be privileged. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO Registration ID: CRD4202017658 BioMed Central 2022-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9281049/ /pubmed/35836247 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13690-022-00927-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Barrett, Nikki M. Burrows, Lisette Atatoa-Carr, Polly Smith, Linda T. Masters-Awatere, Bridgette Holistic antenatal education class interventions: a systematic review of the prioritisation and involvement of Indigenous Peoples’ of Aotearoa New Zealand, Australia, Canada and the United States over a 10-year period 2008 to 2018 |
title | Holistic antenatal education class interventions: a systematic review of the prioritisation and involvement of Indigenous Peoples’ of Aotearoa New Zealand, Australia, Canada and the United States over a 10-year period 2008 to 2018 |
title_full | Holistic antenatal education class interventions: a systematic review of the prioritisation and involvement of Indigenous Peoples’ of Aotearoa New Zealand, Australia, Canada and the United States over a 10-year period 2008 to 2018 |
title_fullStr | Holistic antenatal education class interventions: a systematic review of the prioritisation and involvement of Indigenous Peoples’ of Aotearoa New Zealand, Australia, Canada and the United States over a 10-year period 2008 to 2018 |
title_full_unstemmed | Holistic antenatal education class interventions: a systematic review of the prioritisation and involvement of Indigenous Peoples’ of Aotearoa New Zealand, Australia, Canada and the United States over a 10-year period 2008 to 2018 |
title_short | Holistic antenatal education class interventions: a systematic review of the prioritisation and involvement of Indigenous Peoples’ of Aotearoa New Zealand, Australia, Canada and the United States over a 10-year period 2008 to 2018 |
title_sort | holistic antenatal education class interventions: a systematic review of the prioritisation and involvement of indigenous peoples’ of aotearoa new zealand, australia, canada and the united states over a 10-year period 2008 to 2018 |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9281049/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35836247 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13690-022-00927-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT barrettnikkim holisticantenataleducationclassinterventionsasystematicreviewoftheprioritisationandinvolvementofindigenouspeoplesofaotearoanewzealandaustraliacanadaandtheunitedstatesovera10yearperiod2008to2018 AT burrowslisette holisticantenataleducationclassinterventionsasystematicreviewoftheprioritisationandinvolvementofindigenouspeoplesofaotearoanewzealandaustraliacanadaandtheunitedstatesovera10yearperiod2008to2018 AT atatoacarrpolly holisticantenataleducationclassinterventionsasystematicreviewoftheprioritisationandinvolvementofindigenouspeoplesofaotearoanewzealandaustraliacanadaandtheunitedstatesovera10yearperiod2008to2018 AT smithlindat holisticantenataleducationclassinterventionsasystematicreviewoftheprioritisationandinvolvementofindigenouspeoplesofaotearoanewzealandaustraliacanadaandtheunitedstatesovera10yearperiod2008to2018 AT mastersawaterebridgette holisticantenataleducationclassinterventionsasystematicreviewoftheprioritisationandinvolvementofindigenouspeoplesofaotearoanewzealandaustraliacanadaandtheunitedstatesovera10yearperiod2008to2018 |