Cargando…

Application of test-enhanced learning (TEL) in obstetrics and gynecology: a prospective study

OBJECTIVE: Clinical reasoning is an essential skill, the foundations of which should be acquired during medical school. Within the format of test-based learning, such examinations can also be used to support the long-term retention of procedural knowledge necessary for clinical reasoning. The aim wa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Recker, Florian, Haverkamp, Nicolas, Mustea, Alexander, Gembruch, Ulrich, Raupach, Tobias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9281379/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35831757
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-022-06656-4
_version_ 1784746867464077312
author Recker, Florian
Haverkamp, Nicolas
Mustea, Alexander
Gembruch, Ulrich
Raupach, Tobias
author_facet Recker, Florian
Haverkamp, Nicolas
Mustea, Alexander
Gembruch, Ulrich
Raupach, Tobias
author_sort Recker, Florian
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Clinical reasoning is an essential skill, the foundations of which should be acquired during medical school. Within the format of test-based learning, such examinations can also be used to support the long-term retention of procedural knowledge necessary for clinical reasoning. The aim was to investigate whether repeated exposure to clinical cases in obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN) with built-in questions leads to higher learning outcome than pure reading cases and what influence the delay between the intervention and the final test has on the retention of the respective content. METHODS: In this non-randomised crossover study, 5th-year medical students (duration of the study is 6 years) taking a 1-week clinical attachment in OBGYN participated in computer-based case seminars in winter term 2020/2021, in which different case histories on gynecological-obstetric diseases were presented. Case content was identical for all groups, but the presentation format (cases with key feature questions vs read-only cases) of individual case vignettes changed weekly. The also intervention was repeated after 2 weeks for each group. Knowledge was assessed in an entry and an exit exam consisting of 40 short-answer questions. RESULTS: A total of 94 out of 118 eligible students participated in the study (response rate: 79.7%). Learning outcome was significantly higher for items presented in the key feature format compared to items presented as read-only cases (74.2 ± 8.6% vs. 71.0 ± 9.2%; p = 0.017). Furthermore, the analysis showed that the temporal distance of the intervention package from the final examination had no influence on retention. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to demonstrate an effect of test-enhanced learning on clinical reasoning in the subject of OGBYN. In this cross-over study, repeated testing was more effective than repeated case-based learning alone. Curricular implementation of longitudinal key feature testing can thus improve learning outcomes for OBGYN.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9281379
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92813792022-07-15 Application of test-enhanced learning (TEL) in obstetrics and gynecology: a prospective study Recker, Florian Haverkamp, Nicolas Mustea, Alexander Gembruch, Ulrich Raupach, Tobias Arch Gynecol Obstet General Gynecology OBJECTIVE: Clinical reasoning is an essential skill, the foundations of which should be acquired during medical school. Within the format of test-based learning, such examinations can also be used to support the long-term retention of procedural knowledge necessary for clinical reasoning. The aim was to investigate whether repeated exposure to clinical cases in obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN) with built-in questions leads to higher learning outcome than pure reading cases and what influence the delay between the intervention and the final test has on the retention of the respective content. METHODS: In this non-randomised crossover study, 5th-year medical students (duration of the study is 6 years) taking a 1-week clinical attachment in OBGYN participated in computer-based case seminars in winter term 2020/2021, in which different case histories on gynecological-obstetric diseases were presented. Case content was identical for all groups, but the presentation format (cases with key feature questions vs read-only cases) of individual case vignettes changed weekly. The also intervention was repeated after 2 weeks for each group. Knowledge was assessed in an entry and an exit exam consisting of 40 short-answer questions. RESULTS: A total of 94 out of 118 eligible students participated in the study (response rate: 79.7%). Learning outcome was significantly higher for items presented in the key feature format compared to items presented as read-only cases (74.2 ± 8.6% vs. 71.0 ± 9.2%; p = 0.017). Furthermore, the analysis showed that the temporal distance of the intervention package from the final examination had no influence on retention. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to demonstrate an effect of test-enhanced learning on clinical reasoning in the subject of OGBYN. In this cross-over study, repeated testing was more effective than repeated case-based learning alone. Curricular implementation of longitudinal key feature testing can thus improve learning outcomes for OBGYN. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-07-13 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9281379/ /pubmed/35831757 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-022-06656-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle General Gynecology
Recker, Florian
Haverkamp, Nicolas
Mustea, Alexander
Gembruch, Ulrich
Raupach, Tobias
Application of test-enhanced learning (TEL) in obstetrics and gynecology: a prospective study
title Application of test-enhanced learning (TEL) in obstetrics and gynecology: a prospective study
title_full Application of test-enhanced learning (TEL) in obstetrics and gynecology: a prospective study
title_fullStr Application of test-enhanced learning (TEL) in obstetrics and gynecology: a prospective study
title_full_unstemmed Application of test-enhanced learning (TEL) in obstetrics and gynecology: a prospective study
title_short Application of test-enhanced learning (TEL) in obstetrics and gynecology: a prospective study
title_sort application of test-enhanced learning (tel) in obstetrics and gynecology: a prospective study
topic General Gynecology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9281379/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35831757
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-022-06656-4
work_keys_str_mv AT reckerflorian applicationoftestenhancedlearningtelinobstetricsandgynecologyaprospectivestudy
AT haverkampnicolas applicationoftestenhancedlearningtelinobstetricsandgynecologyaprospectivestudy
AT musteaalexander applicationoftestenhancedlearningtelinobstetricsandgynecologyaprospectivestudy
AT gembruchulrich applicationoftestenhancedlearningtelinobstetricsandgynecologyaprospectivestudy
AT raupachtobias applicationoftestenhancedlearningtelinobstetricsandgynecologyaprospectivestudy