Cargando…

Meat safety legislation and its opportunities and hurdles for innovative approaches: A review

Albert Einstein has been quoted “We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them”. Innovations are necessary to meet future challenges regarding sustainability, animal welfare, slaughter hygiene, meat safety and quality, not at least for optimal balance between these...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nagel-Alne, Gunvor Elise, Murphy, Emil, McCauslin, Brittany, Hauge, Sigrun J., Schrøder-Petersen, Dorte Lene, Holthe, Janne, Alvseike, Ole
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9290325/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36329973
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2022.109160
_version_ 1784748873159278592
author Nagel-Alne, Gunvor Elise
Murphy, Emil
McCauslin, Brittany
Hauge, Sigrun J.
Schrøder-Petersen, Dorte Lene
Holthe, Janne
Alvseike, Ole
author_facet Nagel-Alne, Gunvor Elise
Murphy, Emil
McCauslin, Brittany
Hauge, Sigrun J.
Schrøder-Petersen, Dorte Lene
Holthe, Janne
Alvseike, Ole
author_sort Nagel-Alne, Gunvor Elise
collection PubMed
description Albert Einstein has been quoted “We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them”. Innovations are necessary to meet future challenges regarding sustainability, animal welfare, slaughter hygiene, meat safety and quality, not at least for optimal balance between these dimensions. The red meat safety legislation texts from Europe, New Zealand, USA, and global guidelines, were analysed for normative formulations (“how it is or should be done”) that may create non-intentional hurdles to innovation and new technology. Detailed descriptions of slaughtering techniques and meat processes may hinder innovative processing from being investigated and implemented. The identified problematic normative phrases typically either conserve conventional technologies or organisation of the work, prescribe solutions where no established method, objective criteria or limits exits, or put forward visions impossible to obtain. The Codex Alimentarius was found to have less normative formulations and more functional demands (“what to achieve”) than the national and regional regulations. European, New Zealand's and US′ legislation share many similarities and challenges, and they all reflect the prevailing processing methods. Consequences are briefly commented, and alternative objective functional demands suggested. Normative legislation texts provide familiar context easier to understand, but also make legislation voluminous. This review underlines the mutual dependency between risk-based legislation and conditional flexibility, and between functional demands and control activities targeted on measurable objective criteria. The legislation does not have to be either or. Objective normative phrases in legislation can function as a least common multiple if alternative methods are allowed on condition that they fulfil objective criteria. Context and practical advice should mainly come from textbooks, consultants, white papers and in Food Business Operator's own guidelines, among others.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9290325
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92903252022-11-01 Meat safety legislation and its opportunities and hurdles for innovative approaches: A review Nagel-Alne, Gunvor Elise Murphy, Emil McCauslin, Brittany Hauge, Sigrun J. Schrøder-Petersen, Dorte Lene Holthe, Janne Alvseike, Ole Food Control Article Albert Einstein has been quoted “We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them”. Innovations are necessary to meet future challenges regarding sustainability, animal welfare, slaughter hygiene, meat safety and quality, not at least for optimal balance between these dimensions. The red meat safety legislation texts from Europe, New Zealand, USA, and global guidelines, were analysed for normative formulations (“how it is or should be done”) that may create non-intentional hurdles to innovation and new technology. Detailed descriptions of slaughtering techniques and meat processes may hinder innovative processing from being investigated and implemented. The identified problematic normative phrases typically either conserve conventional technologies or organisation of the work, prescribe solutions where no established method, objective criteria or limits exits, or put forward visions impossible to obtain. The Codex Alimentarius was found to have less normative formulations and more functional demands (“what to achieve”) than the national and regional regulations. European, New Zealand's and US′ legislation share many similarities and challenges, and they all reflect the prevailing processing methods. Consequences are briefly commented, and alternative objective functional demands suggested. Normative legislation texts provide familiar context easier to understand, but also make legislation voluminous. This review underlines the mutual dependency between risk-based legislation and conditional flexibility, and between functional demands and control activities targeted on measurable objective criteria. The legislation does not have to be either or. Objective normative phrases in legislation can function as a least common multiple if alternative methods are allowed on condition that they fulfil objective criteria. Context and practical advice should mainly come from textbooks, consultants, white papers and in Food Business Operator's own guidelines, among others. Elsevier Science 2022-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9290325/ /pubmed/36329973 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2022.109160 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Nagel-Alne, Gunvor Elise
Murphy, Emil
McCauslin, Brittany
Hauge, Sigrun J.
Schrøder-Petersen, Dorte Lene
Holthe, Janne
Alvseike, Ole
Meat safety legislation and its opportunities and hurdles for innovative approaches: A review
title Meat safety legislation and its opportunities and hurdles for innovative approaches: A review
title_full Meat safety legislation and its opportunities and hurdles for innovative approaches: A review
title_fullStr Meat safety legislation and its opportunities and hurdles for innovative approaches: A review
title_full_unstemmed Meat safety legislation and its opportunities and hurdles for innovative approaches: A review
title_short Meat safety legislation and its opportunities and hurdles for innovative approaches: A review
title_sort meat safety legislation and its opportunities and hurdles for innovative approaches: a review
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9290325/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36329973
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2022.109160
work_keys_str_mv AT nagelalnegunvorelise meatsafetylegislationanditsopportunitiesandhurdlesforinnovativeapproachesareview
AT murphyemil meatsafetylegislationanditsopportunitiesandhurdlesforinnovativeapproachesareview
AT mccauslinbrittany meatsafetylegislationanditsopportunitiesandhurdlesforinnovativeapproachesareview
AT haugesigrunj meatsafetylegislationanditsopportunitiesandhurdlesforinnovativeapproachesareview
AT schrøderpetersendortelene meatsafetylegislationanditsopportunitiesandhurdlesforinnovativeapproachesareview
AT holthejanne meatsafetylegislationanditsopportunitiesandhurdlesforinnovativeapproachesareview
AT alvseikeole meatsafetylegislationanditsopportunitiesandhurdlesforinnovativeapproachesareview