Cargando…

The antigen‐binding moiety in the driver's seat of CARs

Immuno‐oncology has been at the forefront of cancer treatment in recent decades. In particular immune checkpoint and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)‐T cell therapy have achieved spectacular results. Over the years, CAR‐T cell development has followed a steady evolutionary path, focusing on increasin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hanssens, Heleen, Meeus, Fien, De Veirman, Kim, Breckpot, Karine, Devoogdt, Nick
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9292017/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34028069
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/med.21818
_version_ 1784749269804122112
author Hanssens, Heleen
Meeus, Fien
De Veirman, Kim
Breckpot, Karine
Devoogdt, Nick
author_facet Hanssens, Heleen
Meeus, Fien
De Veirman, Kim
Breckpot, Karine
Devoogdt, Nick
author_sort Hanssens, Heleen
collection PubMed
description Immuno‐oncology has been at the forefront of cancer treatment in recent decades. In particular immune checkpoint and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)‐T cell therapy have achieved spectacular results. Over the years, CAR‐T cell development has followed a steady evolutionary path, focusing on increasing T cell potency and sustainability, which has given rise to different CAR generations. However, there was less focus on the mode of interaction between the CAR‐T cell and the cancer cell; more specifically on the targeting moiety used in the CAR and its specific properties. Recently, the importance of optimizing this domain has been recognized and the possibilities have been exploited. Over the last 10 years—in addition to the classical scFv‐based CARs—single domain CARs, natural receptor‐ligand CARs, universal CARs and CARs targeting more than one antigen have emerged. In addition, the specific parameters of the targeting domain and their influence on T cell activation are being examined. In this review, we concisely present the history of CAR‐T cell therapy, and then expand on various developments in the CAR ectodomain. We discuss different formats, each with their own advantages and disadvantages, as well as the developments in affinity tuning, avidity effects, epitope location, and influence of the extracellular spacer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9292017
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92920172022-07-20 The antigen‐binding moiety in the driver's seat of CARs Hanssens, Heleen Meeus, Fien De Veirman, Kim Breckpot, Karine Devoogdt, Nick Med Res Rev Review Articles Immuno‐oncology has been at the forefront of cancer treatment in recent decades. In particular immune checkpoint and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)‐T cell therapy have achieved spectacular results. Over the years, CAR‐T cell development has followed a steady evolutionary path, focusing on increasing T cell potency and sustainability, which has given rise to different CAR generations. However, there was less focus on the mode of interaction between the CAR‐T cell and the cancer cell; more specifically on the targeting moiety used in the CAR and its specific properties. Recently, the importance of optimizing this domain has been recognized and the possibilities have been exploited. Over the last 10 years—in addition to the classical scFv‐based CARs—single domain CARs, natural receptor‐ligand CARs, universal CARs and CARs targeting more than one antigen have emerged. In addition, the specific parameters of the targeting domain and their influence on T cell activation are being examined. In this review, we concisely present the history of CAR‐T cell therapy, and then expand on various developments in the CAR ectodomain. We discuss different formats, each with their own advantages and disadvantages, as well as the developments in affinity tuning, avidity effects, epitope location, and influence of the extracellular spacer. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-05-24 2022-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9292017/ /pubmed/34028069 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/med.21818 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Medicinal Research Reviews published by Wiley Periodicals LLC https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Review Articles
Hanssens, Heleen
Meeus, Fien
De Veirman, Kim
Breckpot, Karine
Devoogdt, Nick
The antigen‐binding moiety in the driver's seat of CARs
title The antigen‐binding moiety in the driver's seat of CARs
title_full The antigen‐binding moiety in the driver's seat of CARs
title_fullStr The antigen‐binding moiety in the driver's seat of CARs
title_full_unstemmed The antigen‐binding moiety in the driver's seat of CARs
title_short The antigen‐binding moiety in the driver's seat of CARs
title_sort antigen‐binding moiety in the driver's seat of cars
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9292017/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34028069
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/med.21818
work_keys_str_mv AT hanssensheleen theantigenbindingmoietyinthedriversseatofcars
AT meeusfien theantigenbindingmoietyinthedriversseatofcars
AT deveirmankim theantigenbindingmoietyinthedriversseatofcars
AT breckpotkarine theantigenbindingmoietyinthedriversseatofcars
AT devoogdtnick theantigenbindingmoietyinthedriversseatofcars
AT hanssensheleen antigenbindingmoietyinthedriversseatofcars
AT meeusfien antigenbindingmoietyinthedriversseatofcars
AT deveirmankim antigenbindingmoietyinthedriversseatofcars
AT breckpotkarine antigenbindingmoietyinthedriversseatofcars
AT devoogdtnick antigenbindingmoietyinthedriversseatofcars