Cargando…

Trust, power and learning in workplace‐based assessment: The trainee perspective

For trainees to participate meaningfully in workplace‐based assessment (WBA), they must have trust in their assessor. However, the trainee's dependent position complicates such trust. Understanding how power and trust influence WBAs may help us make them more effective learning opportunities. W...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Castanelli, Damian J., Weller, Jennifer M., Molloy, Elizabeth, Bearman, Margaret
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9292503/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34433230
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/medu.14631
_version_ 1784749386568302592
author Castanelli, Damian J.
Weller, Jennifer M.
Molloy, Elizabeth
Bearman, Margaret
author_facet Castanelli, Damian J.
Weller, Jennifer M.
Molloy, Elizabeth
Bearman, Margaret
author_sort Castanelli, Damian J.
collection PubMed
description For trainees to participate meaningfully in workplace‐based assessment (WBA), they must have trust in their assessor. However, the trainee's dependent position complicates such trust. Understanding how power and trust influence WBAs may help us make them more effective learning opportunities. We conducted semi‐structured interviews with 17 postgraduate anaesthesia trainees across Australia and New Zealand. Sensitised by notions of power, we used constructivist grounded theory methodology to examine trainees' experiences with trusting their supervisors in WBAs. In our trainee accounts, we found that supervisors held significant power to mediate access to learning opportunities and influence trainee progress in training. All episodes where supervisors could observe trainees, from simply working together to formal WBAs, were seen to generate assessment information with potential consequences. In response, trainees actively acquiesced to a deferential role, which helped them access desirable expertise and minimise the risk of reputational harm. Trainees granted trust based on how they anticipated a supervisor would use the power inherent in their role. Trainees learned to ration exposure of their authentic practice to supervisors in proportion to their trust in them. Trainees were more trusting and open to learning when supervisors used their power for the trainee's benefit and avoided WBAs with supervisors they perceived as less trustworthy. If assessment for learning is to flourish, then the trainee–supervisor power dynamic must evolve. Enhancing supervisor behaviour through reflection and professional development to better reward trainee trust would invite more trainee participation in assessment for learning. Modifying the assessment system design to nudge the power balance towards the trainee may also help. Modifications could include designated formative and summative assessments or empowering trainees to select which assessments count towards progress decisions. Attending to power and trust in WBA may stimulate progress towards the previously aspirational goal of assessment for learning in the workplace.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9292503
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92925032022-07-20 Trust, power and learning in workplace‐based assessment: The trainee perspective Castanelli, Damian J. Weller, Jennifer M. Molloy, Elizabeth Bearman, Margaret Med Educ Research Articles For trainees to participate meaningfully in workplace‐based assessment (WBA), they must have trust in their assessor. However, the trainee's dependent position complicates such trust. Understanding how power and trust influence WBAs may help us make them more effective learning opportunities. We conducted semi‐structured interviews with 17 postgraduate anaesthesia trainees across Australia and New Zealand. Sensitised by notions of power, we used constructivist grounded theory methodology to examine trainees' experiences with trusting their supervisors in WBAs. In our trainee accounts, we found that supervisors held significant power to mediate access to learning opportunities and influence trainee progress in training. All episodes where supervisors could observe trainees, from simply working together to formal WBAs, were seen to generate assessment information with potential consequences. In response, trainees actively acquiesced to a deferential role, which helped them access desirable expertise and minimise the risk of reputational harm. Trainees granted trust based on how they anticipated a supervisor would use the power inherent in their role. Trainees learned to ration exposure of their authentic practice to supervisors in proportion to their trust in them. Trainees were more trusting and open to learning when supervisors used their power for the trainee's benefit and avoided WBAs with supervisors they perceived as less trustworthy. If assessment for learning is to flourish, then the trainee–supervisor power dynamic must evolve. Enhancing supervisor behaviour through reflection and professional development to better reward trainee trust would invite more trainee participation in assessment for learning. Modifying the assessment system design to nudge the power balance towards the trainee may also help. Modifications could include designated formative and summative assessments or empowering trainees to select which assessments count towards progress decisions. Attending to power and trust in WBA may stimulate progress towards the previously aspirational goal of assessment for learning in the workplace. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-09-20 2022-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9292503/ /pubmed/34433230 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/medu.14631 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Medical Education published by Association for the Study of Medical Education and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Castanelli, Damian J.
Weller, Jennifer M.
Molloy, Elizabeth
Bearman, Margaret
Trust, power and learning in workplace‐based assessment: The trainee perspective
title Trust, power and learning in workplace‐based assessment: The trainee perspective
title_full Trust, power and learning in workplace‐based assessment: The trainee perspective
title_fullStr Trust, power and learning in workplace‐based assessment: The trainee perspective
title_full_unstemmed Trust, power and learning in workplace‐based assessment: The trainee perspective
title_short Trust, power and learning in workplace‐based assessment: The trainee perspective
title_sort trust, power and learning in workplace‐based assessment: the trainee perspective
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9292503/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34433230
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/medu.14631
work_keys_str_mv AT castanellidamianj trustpowerandlearninginworkplacebasedassessmentthetraineeperspective
AT wellerjenniferm trustpowerandlearninginworkplacebasedassessmentthetraineeperspective
AT molloyelizabeth trustpowerandlearninginworkplacebasedassessmentthetraineeperspective
AT bearmanmargaret trustpowerandlearninginworkplacebasedassessmentthetraineeperspective