Cargando…

Ultra-processed food intake and eating disorders: Cross-sectional associations among French adults

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Data regarding the association between ultra-processed food (UPF) consumption and eating disorders (ED) are scarce. Our aim was to investigate whether UPF intake was associated with different ED types in a large population-based study. METHODS: 43,993 participants (mean age = 51...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Figueiredo, Natasha, Kose, Junko, Srour, Bernard, Julia, Chantal, Kesse-Guyot, Emmanuelle, Péneau, Sandrine, Allès, Benjamin, Paz Graniel, Indira, Chazelas, Eloi, Deschasaux-Tanguy, Mélanie, Debras, Charlotte, Hercberg, Serge, Galan, Pilar, Monteiro, Carlos A., Touvier, Mathilde, Andreeva, Valentina A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Akadémiai Kiadó 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9295249/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35380986
http://dx.doi.org/10.1556/2006.2022.00009
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Data regarding the association between ultra-processed food (UPF) consumption and eating disorders (ED) are scarce. Our aim was to investigate whether UPF intake was associated with different ED types in a large population-based study. METHODS: 43,993 participants (mean age = 51.0 years; 76.1% women) of the French NutriNet-Santé web-cohort who were screened for ED in 2014 via the Sick-Control-One stone-Fat-Food (SCOFF) questionnaire, were included in the analysis. The clinical algorithm Expali (TM) tool was used to identify four ED types: restrictive, bulimic, binge eating, and other (not otherwise specified). Mean dietary intake was evaluated from at least 2 self-administered 24-h dietary records (2013–2015); categorization of food as ultra-processed or not relied on the NOVA classification. The associations between UPF intake (as percent and reflecting mean daily UPF quantity (g/d) within the dietary intake, %UPF) and ED types were evaluated using polytomous logistic regression models. RESULTS: 5,967 participants (13.6%) were categorized as likely ED (restrictive n = 444; bulimic n = 1,575; binge eating n = 3,124; other ED n = 824). The fully-adjusted analyses revealed a positive association between UPF intake and bulimic, binge eating, and other ED: ED risk (odds ratio, OR) for an absolute 10-percentage point incremental increase in %UPF intake were 1.08 (1.01–1.14; P = 0.02), 1.21 (1.16–1.26; P < 0.0001), and 1.11 (1.02–1.20; P = 0.02), respectively. No significant association was detected for restrictive ED. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: This study revealed an association of UPF intake with different ED types among French adults. Future research is needed to elucidate the direction of the observed associations.