Cargando…
Saliva as a sampling matrix for therapeutic drug monitoring of gentamicin in neonates: A prospective population pharmacokinetic and simulation study
AIMS: Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of gentamicin in neonates is recommended for safe and effective dosing and is currently performed by plasma sampling, which is an invasive and painful procedure. In this study, feasibility of a non‐invasive gentamicin TDM strategy using saliva was investigated...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9298055/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34625981 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bcp.15105 |
_version_ | 1784750615706992640 |
---|---|
author | Samb, Amadou Kruizinga, Matthijs Tallahi, Younes van Esdonk, Michiel van Heel, Willemijn Driessen, Gertjan Bijleveld, Yuma Stuurman, Rik Cohen, Adam van Kaam, Anton de Haan, Timo R Mathôt, Ron |
author_facet | Samb, Amadou Kruizinga, Matthijs Tallahi, Younes van Esdonk, Michiel van Heel, Willemijn Driessen, Gertjan Bijleveld, Yuma Stuurman, Rik Cohen, Adam van Kaam, Anton de Haan, Timo R Mathôt, Ron |
author_sort | Samb, Amadou |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of gentamicin in neonates is recommended for safe and effective dosing and is currently performed by plasma sampling, which is an invasive and painful procedure. In this study, feasibility of a non‐invasive gentamicin TDM strategy using saliva was investigated. METHODS: This was a multicentre, prospective, observational cohort study including 54 neonates. Any neonate treated with intravenous gentamicin was eligible for the study. Up to eight saliva samples were collected per patient at different time‐points. Gentamicin levels in saliva were determined with liquid chromatography tandem mass‐spectrometry (LC–MS/MS). A population pharmacokinetic (PK) model was developed using nonlinear mixed‐effects modelling (NONMEM) to describe the relation between gentamicin concentrations in saliva and plasma. Monte Carlo simulations with a representative virtual cohort (n = 3000) were performed to evaluate the probability of target attainment with saliva versus plasma TDM. RESULTS: Plasma PK was adequately described with an earlier published model. An additional saliva compartment describing the salivary gentamicin concentrations was appended to the model with first‐order input (k(13) 0.023 h(−1)) and first‐order elimination (k(30) 0.169 h(−1)). Inter‐individual variability of k(30) was 38%. Postmenstrual age (PMA) correlated negatively with both k(13) and k(30). Simulations demonstrated that TDM with four saliva samples was accurate in 81% of the simulated cases versus 94% when performed with two plasma samples and 87% when performed with one plasma sample. CONCLUSION: TDM of gentamicin using saliva is feasible and the difference in precision between saliva and plasma TDM may not be clinically relevant, especially for premature neonates. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9298055 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92980552022-07-21 Saliva as a sampling matrix for therapeutic drug monitoring of gentamicin in neonates: A prospective population pharmacokinetic and simulation study Samb, Amadou Kruizinga, Matthijs Tallahi, Younes van Esdonk, Michiel van Heel, Willemijn Driessen, Gertjan Bijleveld, Yuma Stuurman, Rik Cohen, Adam van Kaam, Anton de Haan, Timo R Mathôt, Ron Br J Clin Pharmacol Original Articles AIMS: Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of gentamicin in neonates is recommended for safe and effective dosing and is currently performed by plasma sampling, which is an invasive and painful procedure. In this study, feasibility of a non‐invasive gentamicin TDM strategy using saliva was investigated. METHODS: This was a multicentre, prospective, observational cohort study including 54 neonates. Any neonate treated with intravenous gentamicin was eligible for the study. Up to eight saliva samples were collected per patient at different time‐points. Gentamicin levels in saliva were determined with liquid chromatography tandem mass‐spectrometry (LC–MS/MS). A population pharmacokinetic (PK) model was developed using nonlinear mixed‐effects modelling (NONMEM) to describe the relation between gentamicin concentrations in saliva and plasma. Monte Carlo simulations with a representative virtual cohort (n = 3000) were performed to evaluate the probability of target attainment with saliva versus plasma TDM. RESULTS: Plasma PK was adequately described with an earlier published model. An additional saliva compartment describing the salivary gentamicin concentrations was appended to the model with first‐order input (k(13) 0.023 h(−1)) and first‐order elimination (k(30) 0.169 h(−1)). Inter‐individual variability of k(30) was 38%. Postmenstrual age (PMA) correlated negatively with both k(13) and k(30). Simulations demonstrated that TDM with four saliva samples was accurate in 81% of the simulated cases versus 94% when performed with two plasma samples and 87% when performed with one plasma sample. CONCLUSION: TDM of gentamicin using saliva is feasible and the difference in precision between saliva and plasma TDM may not be clinically relevant, especially for premature neonates. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-11-07 2022-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9298055/ /pubmed/34625981 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bcp.15105 Text en © 2021 The Authors. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Pharmacological Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Samb, Amadou Kruizinga, Matthijs Tallahi, Younes van Esdonk, Michiel van Heel, Willemijn Driessen, Gertjan Bijleveld, Yuma Stuurman, Rik Cohen, Adam van Kaam, Anton de Haan, Timo R Mathôt, Ron Saliva as a sampling matrix for therapeutic drug monitoring of gentamicin in neonates: A prospective population pharmacokinetic and simulation study |
title | Saliva as a sampling matrix for therapeutic drug monitoring of gentamicin in neonates: A prospective population pharmacokinetic and simulation study |
title_full | Saliva as a sampling matrix for therapeutic drug monitoring of gentamicin in neonates: A prospective population pharmacokinetic and simulation study |
title_fullStr | Saliva as a sampling matrix for therapeutic drug monitoring of gentamicin in neonates: A prospective population pharmacokinetic and simulation study |
title_full_unstemmed | Saliva as a sampling matrix for therapeutic drug monitoring of gentamicin in neonates: A prospective population pharmacokinetic and simulation study |
title_short | Saliva as a sampling matrix for therapeutic drug monitoring of gentamicin in neonates: A prospective population pharmacokinetic and simulation study |
title_sort | saliva as a sampling matrix for therapeutic drug monitoring of gentamicin in neonates: a prospective population pharmacokinetic and simulation study |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9298055/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34625981 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bcp.15105 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sambamadou salivaasasamplingmatrixfortherapeuticdrugmonitoringofgentamicininneonatesaprospectivepopulationpharmacokineticandsimulationstudy AT kruizingamatthijs salivaasasamplingmatrixfortherapeuticdrugmonitoringofgentamicininneonatesaprospectivepopulationpharmacokineticandsimulationstudy AT tallahiyounes salivaasasamplingmatrixfortherapeuticdrugmonitoringofgentamicininneonatesaprospectivepopulationpharmacokineticandsimulationstudy AT vanesdonkmichiel salivaasasamplingmatrixfortherapeuticdrugmonitoringofgentamicininneonatesaprospectivepopulationpharmacokineticandsimulationstudy AT vanheelwillemijn salivaasasamplingmatrixfortherapeuticdrugmonitoringofgentamicininneonatesaprospectivepopulationpharmacokineticandsimulationstudy AT driessengertjan salivaasasamplingmatrixfortherapeuticdrugmonitoringofgentamicininneonatesaprospectivepopulationpharmacokineticandsimulationstudy AT bijleveldyuma salivaasasamplingmatrixfortherapeuticdrugmonitoringofgentamicininneonatesaprospectivepopulationpharmacokineticandsimulationstudy AT stuurmanrik salivaasasamplingmatrixfortherapeuticdrugmonitoringofgentamicininneonatesaprospectivepopulationpharmacokineticandsimulationstudy AT cohenadam salivaasasamplingmatrixfortherapeuticdrugmonitoringofgentamicininneonatesaprospectivepopulationpharmacokineticandsimulationstudy AT vankaamanton salivaasasamplingmatrixfortherapeuticdrugmonitoringofgentamicininneonatesaprospectivepopulationpharmacokineticandsimulationstudy AT dehaantimor salivaasasamplingmatrixfortherapeuticdrugmonitoringofgentamicininneonatesaprospectivepopulationpharmacokineticandsimulationstudy AT mathotron salivaasasamplingmatrixfortherapeuticdrugmonitoringofgentamicininneonatesaprospectivepopulationpharmacokineticandsimulationstudy |