Cargando…

Delineating the field of medical education: Bibliometric research approach(es)

BACKGROUND: The field of medical education remains poorly delineated such that there is no broad consensus of articles or journals that comprise ‘the field’. This lack of consensus indicates a missed opportunity for researchers to generate insights about the field that could facilitate conducting bi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maggio, Lauren A., Ninkov, Anton, Frank, Jason R., Costello, Joseph A., Artino, Anthony R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9298433/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34652832
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/medu.14677
_version_ 1784750707882065920
author Maggio, Lauren A.
Ninkov, Anton
Frank, Jason R.
Costello, Joseph A.
Artino, Anthony R.
author_facet Maggio, Lauren A.
Ninkov, Anton
Frank, Jason R.
Costello, Joseph A.
Artino, Anthony R.
author_sort Maggio, Lauren A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The field of medical education remains poorly delineated such that there is no broad consensus of articles or journals that comprise ‘the field’. This lack of consensus indicates a missed opportunity for researchers to generate insights about the field that could facilitate conducting bibliometric studies and other research designs (e.g., systematic reviews) and also enable individuals to identify themselves as ‘medical education researchers’. Other fields have utilised bibliometric field delineation, which is the assigning of articles or journals to a certain field in an effort to define that field. PROCESS: In this Research Approach, three bibliometric field delineation approaches—information retrieval, core journals, and journal co‐citation—are introduced. For each approach, the authors describe attempts to apply it in medical education and identify related strengths and weaknesses. Based on co‐citation, the authors propose the Medical Education Journal List 24 (MEJ‐24), as a starting point for delineating medical education and invite the community to collaborate on improving and potentially expanding this list. PEARLS: As a research approach, field delineation is complicated, and there is no clear best way to delineate the field of medical education. However, recent advances in information science provide potentially fruitful approaches to deal with the field's complexity. When considering these approaches, researchers should consider collaborating with bibliometricians. Bibliometric approaches rely on available metadata for articles and journals, which necessitates that researchers examine the metadata prior to analysis to understand its strengths and weaknesses, and to assess how this might affect data interpretation. While using bibliometric approaches for field delineation is valuable, it is important to remember that these techniques are only as good as the research team's interpretation of the data, which suggests that an expanded approach is needed to better delineate medical education, an approach that includes active discussion within the medical education community.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9298433
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92984332022-07-21 Delineating the field of medical education: Bibliometric research approach(es) Maggio, Lauren A. Ninkov, Anton Frank, Jason R. Costello, Joseph A. Artino, Anthony R. Med Educ Focus on Research Methods BACKGROUND: The field of medical education remains poorly delineated such that there is no broad consensus of articles or journals that comprise ‘the field’. This lack of consensus indicates a missed opportunity for researchers to generate insights about the field that could facilitate conducting bibliometric studies and other research designs (e.g., systematic reviews) and also enable individuals to identify themselves as ‘medical education researchers’. Other fields have utilised bibliometric field delineation, which is the assigning of articles or journals to a certain field in an effort to define that field. PROCESS: In this Research Approach, three bibliometric field delineation approaches—information retrieval, core journals, and journal co‐citation—are introduced. For each approach, the authors describe attempts to apply it in medical education and identify related strengths and weaknesses. Based on co‐citation, the authors propose the Medical Education Journal List 24 (MEJ‐24), as a starting point for delineating medical education and invite the community to collaborate on improving and potentially expanding this list. PEARLS: As a research approach, field delineation is complicated, and there is no clear best way to delineate the field of medical education. However, recent advances in information science provide potentially fruitful approaches to deal with the field's complexity. When considering these approaches, researchers should consider collaborating with bibliometricians. Bibliometric approaches rely on available metadata for articles and journals, which necessitates that researchers examine the metadata prior to analysis to understand its strengths and weaknesses, and to assess how this might affect data interpretation. While using bibliometric approaches for field delineation is valuable, it is important to remember that these techniques are only as good as the research team's interpretation of the data, which suggests that an expanded approach is needed to better delineate medical education, an approach that includes active discussion within the medical education community. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-11-02 2022-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9298433/ /pubmed/34652832 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/medu.14677 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Medical Education published by Association for the Study of Medical Education and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This article has been contributed to by US Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Focus on Research Methods
Maggio, Lauren A.
Ninkov, Anton
Frank, Jason R.
Costello, Joseph A.
Artino, Anthony R.
Delineating the field of medical education: Bibliometric research approach(es)
title Delineating the field of medical education: Bibliometric research approach(es)
title_full Delineating the field of medical education: Bibliometric research approach(es)
title_fullStr Delineating the field of medical education: Bibliometric research approach(es)
title_full_unstemmed Delineating the field of medical education: Bibliometric research approach(es)
title_short Delineating the field of medical education: Bibliometric research approach(es)
title_sort delineating the field of medical education: bibliometric research approach(es)
topic Focus on Research Methods
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9298433/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34652832
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/medu.14677
work_keys_str_mv AT maggiolaurena delineatingthefieldofmedicaleducationbibliometricresearchapproaches
AT ninkovanton delineatingthefieldofmedicaleducationbibliometricresearchapproaches
AT frankjasonr delineatingthefieldofmedicaleducationbibliometricresearchapproaches
AT costellojosepha delineatingthefieldofmedicaleducationbibliometricresearchapproaches
AT artinoanthonyr delineatingthefieldofmedicaleducationbibliometricresearchapproaches