Cargando…

Post-Activation Performance Enhancement: Save Time With Active Intra-Complex Recovery Intervals

This study aimed to determine whether the intra-complex active recovery within the strength-power potentiating complex will impact the upper-body post-activation performance enhancement effect and how the magnitude of this effect will change across the upper-body complex training session. Thirteen r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Trybulski, Robert, Makar, Piotr, Alexe, Dan Iulian, Stanciu, Silvius, Piwowar, Rafał, Wilk, Michal, Krzysztofik, Michal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9298750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35874519
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.840722
_version_ 1784750781913628672
author Trybulski, Robert
Makar, Piotr
Alexe, Dan Iulian
Stanciu, Silvius
Piwowar, Rafał
Wilk, Michal
Krzysztofik, Michal
author_facet Trybulski, Robert
Makar, Piotr
Alexe, Dan Iulian
Stanciu, Silvius
Piwowar, Rafał
Wilk, Michal
Krzysztofik, Michal
author_sort Trybulski, Robert
collection PubMed
description This study aimed to determine whether the intra-complex active recovery within the strength-power potentiating complex will impact the upper-body post-activation performance enhancement effect and how the magnitude of this effect will change across the upper-body complex training session. Thirteen resistance-trained males [the age, body mass, height, experience in resistance training, and one-repetition maximum (1RM) in bench press were 27 ± 4 years; 92.3 ± 15.4 kg; 182 ± 6 cm; 6.4 ± 2.4 years, and 118 ± 29 kg, respectively) participated in this study. Each participant completed a baseline bench press throw performance assessment at 30% 1RM. Next, five strength-power potentiating complexes consisting of a bench press at 80% 1RM were tested until the average barbell velocity decreased by 10% as a conditioning activity, and 6 min later, a re-test of bench press throw was carried out. During one experimental session during the rest interval inside the complex, they performed swiss ball leg curls, while between the complexes, a plank exercise (PAP-A) was performed. During the second experimental session, participants performed no exercises within the strength-power potentiating complexes and between them (PAP). Under control conditions, participants ran the same protocol (as the PAP condition) without the conditioning activity (CTRL). Friedman’s test showed significant differences in peak (test = 90.634; p < 0.0001; Kendall’s W = 0.410) and average (test = 74.172; p < 0.0001; Kendall’s W = 0.336) barbell velocities during bench press throw. Pairwise comparisons indicated that the peak and average barbell velocities significantly increased in the fourth set [p = 0.022, effect size (ES) = 0.76 and p = 0.013, ES = 0.69, respectively], and the average barbell velocity was also increased in the second set (p = 0.018, ES = 0.77) in comparison to the baseline value during the PAP-A condition. Moreover, the peak barbell velocity was increased in the second (p = 0.008, ES = 0.72) and third (p = 0.019, ES = 0.76) sets compared to the baseline value during the PAP condition. This study showed that body-weight lower-body exercise as an intra-complex active recovery did not impair the upper-body post-activation performance enhancement effect across the complex training session.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9298750
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92987502022-07-21 Post-Activation Performance Enhancement: Save Time With Active Intra-Complex Recovery Intervals Trybulski, Robert Makar, Piotr Alexe, Dan Iulian Stanciu, Silvius Piwowar, Rafał Wilk, Michal Krzysztofik, Michal Front Physiol Physiology This study aimed to determine whether the intra-complex active recovery within the strength-power potentiating complex will impact the upper-body post-activation performance enhancement effect and how the magnitude of this effect will change across the upper-body complex training session. Thirteen resistance-trained males [the age, body mass, height, experience in resistance training, and one-repetition maximum (1RM) in bench press were 27 ± 4 years; 92.3 ± 15.4 kg; 182 ± 6 cm; 6.4 ± 2.4 years, and 118 ± 29 kg, respectively) participated in this study. Each participant completed a baseline bench press throw performance assessment at 30% 1RM. Next, five strength-power potentiating complexes consisting of a bench press at 80% 1RM were tested until the average barbell velocity decreased by 10% as a conditioning activity, and 6 min later, a re-test of bench press throw was carried out. During one experimental session during the rest interval inside the complex, they performed swiss ball leg curls, while between the complexes, a plank exercise (PAP-A) was performed. During the second experimental session, participants performed no exercises within the strength-power potentiating complexes and between them (PAP). Under control conditions, participants ran the same protocol (as the PAP condition) without the conditioning activity (CTRL). Friedman’s test showed significant differences in peak (test = 90.634; p < 0.0001; Kendall’s W = 0.410) and average (test = 74.172; p < 0.0001; Kendall’s W = 0.336) barbell velocities during bench press throw. Pairwise comparisons indicated that the peak and average barbell velocities significantly increased in the fourth set [p = 0.022, effect size (ES) = 0.76 and p = 0.013, ES = 0.69, respectively], and the average barbell velocity was also increased in the second set (p = 0.018, ES = 0.77) in comparison to the baseline value during the PAP-A condition. Moreover, the peak barbell velocity was increased in the second (p = 0.008, ES = 0.72) and third (p = 0.019, ES = 0.76) sets compared to the baseline value during the PAP condition. This study showed that body-weight lower-body exercise as an intra-complex active recovery did not impair the upper-body post-activation performance enhancement effect across the complex training session. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9298750/ /pubmed/35874519 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.840722 Text en Copyright © 2022 Trybulski, Makar, Alexe, Stanciu, Piwowar, Wilk and Krzysztofik. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
Trybulski, Robert
Makar, Piotr
Alexe, Dan Iulian
Stanciu, Silvius
Piwowar, Rafał
Wilk, Michal
Krzysztofik, Michal
Post-Activation Performance Enhancement: Save Time With Active Intra-Complex Recovery Intervals
title Post-Activation Performance Enhancement: Save Time With Active Intra-Complex Recovery Intervals
title_full Post-Activation Performance Enhancement: Save Time With Active Intra-Complex Recovery Intervals
title_fullStr Post-Activation Performance Enhancement: Save Time With Active Intra-Complex Recovery Intervals
title_full_unstemmed Post-Activation Performance Enhancement: Save Time With Active Intra-Complex Recovery Intervals
title_short Post-Activation Performance Enhancement: Save Time With Active Intra-Complex Recovery Intervals
title_sort post-activation performance enhancement: save time with active intra-complex recovery intervals
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9298750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35874519
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.840722
work_keys_str_mv AT trybulskirobert postactivationperformanceenhancementsavetimewithactiveintracomplexrecoveryintervals
AT makarpiotr postactivationperformanceenhancementsavetimewithactiveintracomplexrecoveryintervals
AT alexedaniulian postactivationperformanceenhancementsavetimewithactiveintracomplexrecoveryintervals
AT stanciusilvius postactivationperformanceenhancementsavetimewithactiveintracomplexrecoveryintervals
AT piwowarrafał postactivationperformanceenhancementsavetimewithactiveintracomplexrecoveryintervals
AT wilkmichal postactivationperformanceenhancementsavetimewithactiveintracomplexrecoveryintervals
AT krzysztofikmichal postactivationperformanceenhancementsavetimewithactiveintracomplexrecoveryintervals