Cargando…

Case Study of N‐( i )Pr versus N‐Mes Substituted NHC Ligands in Nickel Chemistry: The Coordination and Cyclotrimerization of Alkynes at [Ni(NHC)(2)]

A case study on the effect of the employment of two different NHC ligands in complexes [Ni(NHC)(2)] (NHC=( i )Pr(2)Im(Me) 1(Me) , Mes(2)Im 2) and their behavior towards alkynes is reported. The reaction of a mixture of [Ni(2)(( i )Pr(2)Im(Me))(4)(μ‐(η ( 2 ) : η(2))‐COD)] B/ [Ni(( i )Pr(2)Im(Me))(2)(...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tendera, Lukas, Helm, Moritz, Krahfuss, Mirjam J., Kuntze‐Fechner, Maximilian W., Radius, Udo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9299202/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34713939
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/chem.202103093
_version_ 1784750907066417152
author Tendera, Lukas
Helm, Moritz
Krahfuss, Mirjam J.
Kuntze‐Fechner, Maximilian W.
Radius, Udo
author_facet Tendera, Lukas
Helm, Moritz
Krahfuss, Mirjam J.
Kuntze‐Fechner, Maximilian W.
Radius, Udo
author_sort Tendera, Lukas
collection PubMed
description A case study on the effect of the employment of two different NHC ligands in complexes [Ni(NHC)(2)] (NHC=( i )Pr(2)Im(Me) 1(Me) , Mes(2)Im 2) and their behavior towards alkynes is reported. The reaction of a mixture of [Ni(2)(( i )Pr(2)Im(Me))(4)(μ‐(η ( 2 ) : η(2))‐COD)] B/ [Ni(( i )Pr(2)Im(Me))(2)(η(4)‐COD)] B’ or [Ni(Mes(2)Im)(2)] 2, respectively, with alkynes afforded complexes [Ni(NHC)(2)(η(2)‐alkyne)] (NHC=( i )Pr(2)Im(Me): alkyne=MeC≡CMe 3, H(7)C(3)C≡CC(3)H(7) 4, PhC≡CPh 5, MeOOCC≡CCOOMe 6, Me(3)SiC≡CSiMe(3) 7, PhC≡CMe 8, HC≡CC(3)H(7) 9, HC≡CPh 10, HC≡C(p‐Tol) 11, HC≡C(4‐( t )Bu‐C(6)H(4)) 12, HC≡CCOOMe 13; NHC=Mes(2)Im: alkyne=MeC≡CMe 14, MeOOCC≡CCOOMe 15, PhC≡CMe 16, HC≡C(4‐( t )Bu‐C(6)H(4)) 17, HC≡CCOOMe 18). Unusual rearrangement products 11 a and 12 a were identified for the complexes of the terminal alkynes HC≡C(p‐Tol) and HC≡C(4‐( t )Bu‐C(6)H(4)), 11 and 12, which were formed by addition of a C−H bond of one of the NHC N‐( i )Pr methyl groups to the C≡C triple bond of the coordinated alkyne. Complex 2 catalyzes the cyclotrimerization of 2‐butyne, 4‐octyne, diphenylacetylene, dimethyl acetylendicarboxylate, 1‐pentyne, phenylacetylene and methyl propiolate at ambient conditions, whereas 1(Me) is not a good catalyst. The reaction of 2 with 2‐butyne was monitored in some detail, which led to a mechanistic proposal for the cyclotrimerization at [Ni(NHC)(2)]. DFT calculations reveal that the differences between 1(M) (e) and 2 for alkyne cyclotrimerization lie in the energy profile of the initiation steps, which is very shallow for 2, and each step is associated with only a moderate energy change. The higher stability of 3 compared to 14 is attributed to a better electron transfer from the NHC to the metal to the alkyne ligand for the N‐alkyl substituted NHC, to enhanced Ni‐alkyne backbonding due to a smaller C(NHC)−Ni−C(NHC) bite angle, and to less steric repulsion of the smaller NHC ( i )Pr(2)Im(Me).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9299202
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92992022022-07-21 Case Study of N‐( i )Pr versus N‐Mes Substituted NHC Ligands in Nickel Chemistry: The Coordination and Cyclotrimerization of Alkynes at [Ni(NHC)(2)] Tendera, Lukas Helm, Moritz Krahfuss, Mirjam J. Kuntze‐Fechner, Maximilian W. Radius, Udo Chemistry Full Papers A case study on the effect of the employment of two different NHC ligands in complexes [Ni(NHC)(2)] (NHC=( i )Pr(2)Im(Me) 1(Me) , Mes(2)Im 2) and their behavior towards alkynes is reported. The reaction of a mixture of [Ni(2)(( i )Pr(2)Im(Me))(4)(μ‐(η ( 2 ) : η(2))‐COD)] B/ [Ni(( i )Pr(2)Im(Me))(2)(η(4)‐COD)] B’ or [Ni(Mes(2)Im)(2)] 2, respectively, with alkynes afforded complexes [Ni(NHC)(2)(η(2)‐alkyne)] (NHC=( i )Pr(2)Im(Me): alkyne=MeC≡CMe 3, H(7)C(3)C≡CC(3)H(7) 4, PhC≡CPh 5, MeOOCC≡CCOOMe 6, Me(3)SiC≡CSiMe(3) 7, PhC≡CMe 8, HC≡CC(3)H(7) 9, HC≡CPh 10, HC≡C(p‐Tol) 11, HC≡C(4‐( t )Bu‐C(6)H(4)) 12, HC≡CCOOMe 13; NHC=Mes(2)Im: alkyne=MeC≡CMe 14, MeOOCC≡CCOOMe 15, PhC≡CMe 16, HC≡C(4‐( t )Bu‐C(6)H(4)) 17, HC≡CCOOMe 18). Unusual rearrangement products 11 a and 12 a were identified for the complexes of the terminal alkynes HC≡C(p‐Tol) and HC≡C(4‐( t )Bu‐C(6)H(4)), 11 and 12, which were formed by addition of a C−H bond of one of the NHC N‐( i )Pr methyl groups to the C≡C triple bond of the coordinated alkyne. Complex 2 catalyzes the cyclotrimerization of 2‐butyne, 4‐octyne, diphenylacetylene, dimethyl acetylendicarboxylate, 1‐pentyne, phenylacetylene and methyl propiolate at ambient conditions, whereas 1(Me) is not a good catalyst. The reaction of 2 with 2‐butyne was monitored in some detail, which led to a mechanistic proposal for the cyclotrimerization at [Ni(NHC)(2)]. DFT calculations reveal that the differences between 1(M) (e) and 2 for alkyne cyclotrimerization lie in the energy profile of the initiation steps, which is very shallow for 2, and each step is associated with only a moderate energy change. The higher stability of 3 compared to 14 is attributed to a better electron transfer from the NHC to the metal to the alkyne ligand for the N‐alkyl substituted NHC, to enhanced Ni‐alkyne backbonding due to a smaller C(NHC)−Ni−C(NHC) bite angle, and to less steric repulsion of the smaller NHC ( i )Pr(2)Im(Me). John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-11-16 2021-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9299202/ /pubmed/34713939 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/chem.202103093 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Chemistry - A European Journal published by Wiley-VCH GmbH https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Full Papers
Tendera, Lukas
Helm, Moritz
Krahfuss, Mirjam J.
Kuntze‐Fechner, Maximilian W.
Radius, Udo
Case Study of N‐( i )Pr versus N‐Mes Substituted NHC Ligands in Nickel Chemistry: The Coordination and Cyclotrimerization of Alkynes at [Ni(NHC)(2)]
title Case Study of N‐( i )Pr versus N‐Mes Substituted NHC Ligands in Nickel Chemistry: The Coordination and Cyclotrimerization of Alkynes at [Ni(NHC)(2)]
title_full Case Study of N‐( i )Pr versus N‐Mes Substituted NHC Ligands in Nickel Chemistry: The Coordination and Cyclotrimerization of Alkynes at [Ni(NHC)(2)]
title_fullStr Case Study of N‐( i )Pr versus N‐Mes Substituted NHC Ligands in Nickel Chemistry: The Coordination and Cyclotrimerization of Alkynes at [Ni(NHC)(2)]
title_full_unstemmed Case Study of N‐( i )Pr versus N‐Mes Substituted NHC Ligands in Nickel Chemistry: The Coordination and Cyclotrimerization of Alkynes at [Ni(NHC)(2)]
title_short Case Study of N‐( i )Pr versus N‐Mes Substituted NHC Ligands in Nickel Chemistry: The Coordination and Cyclotrimerization of Alkynes at [Ni(NHC)(2)]
title_sort case study of n‐( i )pr versus n‐mes substituted nhc ligands in nickel chemistry: the coordination and cyclotrimerization of alkynes at [ni(nhc)(2)]
topic Full Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9299202/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34713939
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/chem.202103093
work_keys_str_mv AT tenderalukas casestudyofniprversusnmessubstitutednhcligandsinnickelchemistrythecoordinationandcyclotrimerizationofalkynesatninhc2
AT helmmoritz casestudyofniprversusnmessubstitutednhcligandsinnickelchemistrythecoordinationandcyclotrimerizationofalkynesatninhc2
AT krahfussmirjamj casestudyofniprversusnmessubstitutednhcligandsinnickelchemistrythecoordinationandcyclotrimerizationofalkynesatninhc2
AT kuntzefechnermaximilianw casestudyofniprversusnmessubstitutednhcligandsinnickelchemistrythecoordinationandcyclotrimerizationofalkynesatninhc2
AT radiusudo casestudyofniprversusnmessubstitutednhcligandsinnickelchemistrythecoordinationandcyclotrimerizationofalkynesatninhc2