Cargando…

Open Doors by Fair Means: a quasi-experimental controlled study on the effects of an open-door policy on acute psychiatric wards

BACKGROUND: Psychiatric wards treating involuntarily admitted patients are traditionally locked to prevent absconding. However, on the basis of observational evidence, the necessity for locked units in psychiatric hospitals has increasingly been questioned. Updated Mental Health Laws in several Fede...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schreiber, Lisa K., Metzger, Florian G., Flammer, Erich, Rinke, Heike, Fallgatter, Andreas J., Steinert, Tilman
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9308253/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35869551
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08322-6
_version_ 1784752947376160768
author Schreiber, Lisa K.
Metzger, Florian G.
Flammer, Erich
Rinke, Heike
Fallgatter, Andreas J.
Steinert, Tilman
author_facet Schreiber, Lisa K.
Metzger, Florian G.
Flammer, Erich
Rinke, Heike
Fallgatter, Andreas J.
Steinert, Tilman
author_sort Schreiber, Lisa K.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Psychiatric wards treating involuntarily admitted patients are traditionally locked to prevent absconding. However, on the basis of observational evidence, the necessity for locked units in psychiatric hospitals has increasingly been questioned. Updated Mental Health Laws in several Federal States of Germany legitimate involuntary commitment without generally locked doors. METHODS: We examined the effects of an open-door policy in a quasi-experimental, prospective design. For the first time, at each of two locations, two identical wards serving as control and intervention could be compared. After a baseline period of three months, one ward at each location started the 12 month intervention period with the implementation of an open-door policy, while the respective control ward, as before, used open doors only facultatively. Primary outcomes were average opening times of the four wards between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., and the number of involuntary treatment days with the doors open. Secondary outcomes were adverse events including aggressive incidents, absconding, suicide attempts and coercive measures. RESULTS: Overall, door-opening times increased significantly at both sites´ intervention wards. The number of adverse events did not increase during intervention period. Frequencies of coercive measures decreased in Friedrichshafen and remained unchanged in Tuebingen. In case of the intervention ward in Friedrichshafen, doors were open in up to 91% of all involuntary treatment days, whereas in the control ward, this was only the case in 67% of all involuntary treatment days (p < .001). In case of the intervention ward in Tuebingen, 45% of involuntary treatment days had open doors, compared to 30% in the control ward (p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to manage psychiatric wards with open doors without taking inappropriate risks. The extent to which open-door policies are achievable is be dependent on staffing and patient characteristics. Further research is necessary to explore the role of staff attitudes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Our trial "Open Doors by Fair Means" is retrospectively registered with DRKS (DRKS00015154) on Sept. 10(th) 2018 and displayed on the public web site. It is searchable via its meta-registry (http://apps.who.int/trialsearch/).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9308253
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93082532022-07-24 Open Doors by Fair Means: a quasi-experimental controlled study on the effects of an open-door policy on acute psychiatric wards Schreiber, Lisa K. Metzger, Florian G. Flammer, Erich Rinke, Heike Fallgatter, Andreas J. Steinert, Tilman BMC Health Serv Res Research BACKGROUND: Psychiatric wards treating involuntarily admitted patients are traditionally locked to prevent absconding. However, on the basis of observational evidence, the necessity for locked units in psychiatric hospitals has increasingly been questioned. Updated Mental Health Laws in several Federal States of Germany legitimate involuntary commitment without generally locked doors. METHODS: We examined the effects of an open-door policy in a quasi-experimental, prospective design. For the first time, at each of two locations, two identical wards serving as control and intervention could be compared. After a baseline period of three months, one ward at each location started the 12 month intervention period with the implementation of an open-door policy, while the respective control ward, as before, used open doors only facultatively. Primary outcomes were average opening times of the four wards between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., and the number of involuntary treatment days with the doors open. Secondary outcomes were adverse events including aggressive incidents, absconding, suicide attempts and coercive measures. RESULTS: Overall, door-opening times increased significantly at both sites´ intervention wards. The number of adverse events did not increase during intervention period. Frequencies of coercive measures decreased in Friedrichshafen and remained unchanged in Tuebingen. In case of the intervention ward in Friedrichshafen, doors were open in up to 91% of all involuntary treatment days, whereas in the control ward, this was only the case in 67% of all involuntary treatment days (p < .001). In case of the intervention ward in Tuebingen, 45% of involuntary treatment days had open doors, compared to 30% in the control ward (p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to manage psychiatric wards with open doors without taking inappropriate risks. The extent to which open-door policies are achievable is be dependent on staffing and patient characteristics. Further research is necessary to explore the role of staff attitudes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Our trial "Open Doors by Fair Means" is retrospectively registered with DRKS (DRKS00015154) on Sept. 10(th) 2018 and displayed on the public web site. It is searchable via its meta-registry (http://apps.who.int/trialsearch/). BioMed Central 2022-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9308253/ /pubmed/35869551 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08322-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Schreiber, Lisa K.
Metzger, Florian G.
Flammer, Erich
Rinke, Heike
Fallgatter, Andreas J.
Steinert, Tilman
Open Doors by Fair Means: a quasi-experimental controlled study on the effects of an open-door policy on acute psychiatric wards
title Open Doors by Fair Means: a quasi-experimental controlled study on the effects of an open-door policy on acute psychiatric wards
title_full Open Doors by Fair Means: a quasi-experimental controlled study on the effects of an open-door policy on acute psychiatric wards
title_fullStr Open Doors by Fair Means: a quasi-experimental controlled study on the effects of an open-door policy on acute psychiatric wards
title_full_unstemmed Open Doors by Fair Means: a quasi-experimental controlled study on the effects of an open-door policy on acute psychiatric wards
title_short Open Doors by Fair Means: a quasi-experimental controlled study on the effects of an open-door policy on acute psychiatric wards
title_sort open doors by fair means: a quasi-experimental controlled study on the effects of an open-door policy on acute psychiatric wards
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9308253/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35869551
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08322-6
work_keys_str_mv AT schreiberlisak opendoorsbyfairmeansaquasiexperimentalcontrolledstudyontheeffectsofanopendoorpolicyonacutepsychiatricwards
AT metzgerfloriang opendoorsbyfairmeansaquasiexperimentalcontrolledstudyontheeffectsofanopendoorpolicyonacutepsychiatricwards
AT flammererich opendoorsbyfairmeansaquasiexperimentalcontrolledstudyontheeffectsofanopendoorpolicyonacutepsychiatricwards
AT rinkeheike opendoorsbyfairmeansaquasiexperimentalcontrolledstudyontheeffectsofanopendoorpolicyonacutepsychiatricwards
AT fallgatterandreasj opendoorsbyfairmeansaquasiexperimentalcontrolledstudyontheeffectsofanopendoorpolicyonacutepsychiatricwards
AT steinerttilman opendoorsbyfairmeansaquasiexperimentalcontrolledstudyontheeffectsofanopendoorpolicyonacutepsychiatricwards