Cargando…

The pedagogical value of near-peer feedback in online OSCEs

PURPOSE OF THE ARTICLE: During the Covid-19 pandemic, formative OSCE were transformed into online OSCE, and senior students (near peers) substituted experienced clinical teachers. The aims of the study were to evaluate quality of the feedbacks given by near peers during online OSCEs and explore the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sader, Julia, Cerutti, Bernard, Meynard, Louise, Geoffroy, Frédéric, Meister, Véronique, Paignon, Adeline, Junod Perron, Noëlle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9310367/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35879752
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03629-8
_version_ 1784753369976406016
author Sader, Julia
Cerutti, Bernard
Meynard, Louise
Geoffroy, Frédéric
Meister, Véronique
Paignon, Adeline
Junod Perron, Noëlle
author_facet Sader, Julia
Cerutti, Bernard
Meynard, Louise
Geoffroy, Frédéric
Meister, Véronique
Paignon, Adeline
Junod Perron, Noëlle
author_sort Sader, Julia
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE OF THE ARTICLE: During the Covid-19 pandemic, formative OSCE were transformed into online OSCE, and senior students (near peers) substituted experienced clinical teachers. The aims of the study were to evaluate quality of the feedbacks given by near peers during online OSCEs and explore the experience of near-peer feedback from both learner’s and near peer’s perspectives. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All 2nd year medical students (n = 158) attended an online OSCE under the supervision of twelve senior medical students. Outcome measures were 1) students’ perception of the quality of the feedback through an online survey (Likert 1–5); 2) objective assessment of the quality of the feedback focusing on both the process and the content using a feedback scale (Likert 1–5); 3) experience of near peer feedback in two different focus groups. RESULTS: One hundred six medical students answered the questionnaire and had their feedback session videotaped. The mean perceived overall quality of senior students’ overall feedback was 4.75 SD 0.52. They especially valued self-evaluation (mean 4.80 SD 0.67), balanced feedback (mean 4.93 SD 0.29) and provision of simulated patient’s feedback (mean 4.97 SD 0.17). The overall objective assessment of the feedback quality was 3.73 SD 0.38: highly scored skills were subjectivity (mean 3.95 SD 1.12) and taking into account student’s self-evaluation (mean 3.71 (SD 0.87). Senior students mainly addressed history taking issues (mean items 3.53 SD 2.37) and communication skills (mean items 4.89 SD 2.43) during feedback. Participants reported that near peer feedback was less stressful and more tailored to learning needs– challenges for senior students included to remain objective and to provide negative feedback. CONCLUSION: Increased involvement of near peers in teaching activities is strongly supported for formative OSCE and should be implemented in parallel even if experience teachers are again involved in such teaching activities. However, it requires training not only on feedback skills but also on the specific content of the formative OSCE. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-022-03629-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9310367
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93103672022-07-25 The pedagogical value of near-peer feedback in online OSCEs Sader, Julia Cerutti, Bernard Meynard, Louise Geoffroy, Frédéric Meister, Véronique Paignon, Adeline Junod Perron, Noëlle BMC Med Educ Research PURPOSE OF THE ARTICLE: During the Covid-19 pandemic, formative OSCE were transformed into online OSCE, and senior students (near peers) substituted experienced clinical teachers. The aims of the study were to evaluate quality of the feedbacks given by near peers during online OSCEs and explore the experience of near-peer feedback from both learner’s and near peer’s perspectives. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All 2nd year medical students (n = 158) attended an online OSCE under the supervision of twelve senior medical students. Outcome measures were 1) students’ perception of the quality of the feedback through an online survey (Likert 1–5); 2) objective assessment of the quality of the feedback focusing on both the process and the content using a feedback scale (Likert 1–5); 3) experience of near peer feedback in two different focus groups. RESULTS: One hundred six medical students answered the questionnaire and had their feedback session videotaped. The mean perceived overall quality of senior students’ overall feedback was 4.75 SD 0.52. They especially valued self-evaluation (mean 4.80 SD 0.67), balanced feedback (mean 4.93 SD 0.29) and provision of simulated patient’s feedback (mean 4.97 SD 0.17). The overall objective assessment of the feedback quality was 3.73 SD 0.38: highly scored skills were subjectivity (mean 3.95 SD 1.12) and taking into account student’s self-evaluation (mean 3.71 (SD 0.87). Senior students mainly addressed history taking issues (mean items 3.53 SD 2.37) and communication skills (mean items 4.89 SD 2.43) during feedback. Participants reported that near peer feedback was less stressful and more tailored to learning needs– challenges for senior students included to remain objective and to provide negative feedback. CONCLUSION: Increased involvement of near peers in teaching activities is strongly supported for formative OSCE and should be implemented in parallel even if experience teachers are again involved in such teaching activities. However, it requires training not only on feedback skills but also on the specific content of the formative OSCE. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-022-03629-8. BioMed Central 2022-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9310367/ /pubmed/35879752 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03629-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Sader, Julia
Cerutti, Bernard
Meynard, Louise
Geoffroy, Frédéric
Meister, Véronique
Paignon, Adeline
Junod Perron, Noëlle
The pedagogical value of near-peer feedback in online OSCEs
title The pedagogical value of near-peer feedback in online OSCEs
title_full The pedagogical value of near-peer feedback in online OSCEs
title_fullStr The pedagogical value of near-peer feedback in online OSCEs
title_full_unstemmed The pedagogical value of near-peer feedback in online OSCEs
title_short The pedagogical value of near-peer feedback in online OSCEs
title_sort pedagogical value of near-peer feedback in online osces
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9310367/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35879752
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03629-8
work_keys_str_mv AT saderjulia thepedagogicalvalueofnearpeerfeedbackinonlineosces
AT ceruttibernard thepedagogicalvalueofnearpeerfeedbackinonlineosces
AT meynardlouise thepedagogicalvalueofnearpeerfeedbackinonlineosces
AT geoffroyfrederic thepedagogicalvalueofnearpeerfeedbackinonlineosces
AT meisterveronique thepedagogicalvalueofnearpeerfeedbackinonlineosces
AT paignonadeline thepedagogicalvalueofnearpeerfeedbackinonlineosces
AT junodperronnoelle thepedagogicalvalueofnearpeerfeedbackinonlineosces
AT saderjulia pedagogicalvalueofnearpeerfeedbackinonlineosces
AT ceruttibernard pedagogicalvalueofnearpeerfeedbackinonlineosces
AT meynardlouise pedagogicalvalueofnearpeerfeedbackinonlineosces
AT geoffroyfrederic pedagogicalvalueofnearpeerfeedbackinonlineosces
AT meisterveronique pedagogicalvalueofnearpeerfeedbackinonlineosces
AT paignonadeline pedagogicalvalueofnearpeerfeedbackinonlineosces
AT junodperronnoelle pedagogicalvalueofnearpeerfeedbackinonlineosces