Cargando…
Quantitative Assessment of Ligand Substituent Effects on σ‐ and π‐Contributions to Fe−N Bonds in Spin Crossover Fe(II) Complexes
The effect of para‐substituent X on the electronic structure of sixteen tridentate 4‐X‐(2,6‐di(pyrazol‐1‐yl))‐pyridine (bpp(X) ) ligands and the corresponding solution spin crossover [Fe(II)(bpp(X) )(2)](2+) complexes is analysed further, to supply quantitative insights into the effect of X on the σ...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9310619/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35224791 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/chem.202104314 |
_version_ | 1784753426050056192 |
---|---|
author | Bondì, Luca Garden, Anna L. Totti, Federico Jerabek, Paul Brooker, Sally |
author_facet | Bondì, Luca Garden, Anna L. Totti, Federico Jerabek, Paul Brooker, Sally |
author_sort | Bondì, Luca |
collection | PubMed |
description | The effect of para‐substituent X on the electronic structure of sixteen tridentate 4‐X‐(2,6‐di(pyrazol‐1‐yl))‐pyridine (bpp(X) ) ligands and the corresponding solution spin crossover [Fe(II)(bpp(X) )(2)](2+) complexes is analysed further, to supply quantitative insights into the effect of X on the σ‐donor and π‐acceptor character of the Fe‐N(A) (pyridine) bonds. EDA‐NOCV on the sixteen LS complexes revealed that neither ΔE ( orb,σ+π ) (R(2)=0.48) nor ΔE ( orb,π ) (R(2)=0.31) correlated with the experimental solution T(1/2) values (which are expected to reflect the ligand field imposed on the iron centre), but that ΔE ( orb,σ ) correlates well (R(2)=0.82) and implies that as X changes from EDG→EWG (Electron Donating to Withdrawing Group), the ligand becomes a better σ‐donor. This counter‐intuitive result was further probed by Mulliken analysis of the N(A) atomic orbitals: N(A) (p(x) ) involved in the Fe−N σ‐bond vs. the perpendicular N(A) (p(z) ) employed in the ligand aromatic π‐system. As X changes EDG→EWG, the electron population on N(A) (p(z) ) decreases, making it a better π‐acceptor, whilst that in N(A) (p(x) ) increases, making it a better σ‐bond donor; both increase ligand field, and T(1/2) as observed. In 2016, Halcrow, Deeth and co‐workers proposed an intuitively reasonable explanation of the effect of the para‐X substituents on the T(1/2) values in this family of complexes, consistent with the calculated MO energy levels, that M→L π‐backdonation dominates in these M−L bonds. Here the quantitative EDA‐NOCV analysis of the M−L bond contributions provides a more complete, coherent and detailed picture of the relative impact of M−L σ‐versus π‐bonding in determining the observed T(1/2), refining the earlier interpretation and revealing the importance of the σ‐bonding. Furthermore, our results are in perfect agreement with the ΔE(HS‐LS) vs. σ(p) (+)(X) correlation reported in their work. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9310619 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93106192022-07-29 Quantitative Assessment of Ligand Substituent Effects on σ‐ and π‐Contributions to Fe−N Bonds in Spin Crossover Fe(II) Complexes Bondì, Luca Garden, Anna L. Totti, Federico Jerabek, Paul Brooker, Sally Chemistry Research Articles The effect of para‐substituent X on the electronic structure of sixteen tridentate 4‐X‐(2,6‐di(pyrazol‐1‐yl))‐pyridine (bpp(X) ) ligands and the corresponding solution spin crossover [Fe(II)(bpp(X) )(2)](2+) complexes is analysed further, to supply quantitative insights into the effect of X on the σ‐donor and π‐acceptor character of the Fe‐N(A) (pyridine) bonds. EDA‐NOCV on the sixteen LS complexes revealed that neither ΔE ( orb,σ+π ) (R(2)=0.48) nor ΔE ( orb,π ) (R(2)=0.31) correlated with the experimental solution T(1/2) values (which are expected to reflect the ligand field imposed on the iron centre), but that ΔE ( orb,σ ) correlates well (R(2)=0.82) and implies that as X changes from EDG→EWG (Electron Donating to Withdrawing Group), the ligand becomes a better σ‐donor. This counter‐intuitive result was further probed by Mulliken analysis of the N(A) atomic orbitals: N(A) (p(x) ) involved in the Fe−N σ‐bond vs. the perpendicular N(A) (p(z) ) employed in the ligand aromatic π‐system. As X changes EDG→EWG, the electron population on N(A) (p(z) ) decreases, making it a better π‐acceptor, whilst that in N(A) (p(x) ) increases, making it a better σ‐bond donor; both increase ligand field, and T(1/2) as observed. In 2016, Halcrow, Deeth and co‐workers proposed an intuitively reasonable explanation of the effect of the para‐X substituents on the T(1/2) values in this family of complexes, consistent with the calculated MO energy levels, that M→L π‐backdonation dominates in these M−L bonds. Here the quantitative EDA‐NOCV analysis of the M−L bond contributions provides a more complete, coherent and detailed picture of the relative impact of M−L σ‐versus π‐bonding in determining the observed T(1/2), refining the earlier interpretation and revealing the importance of the σ‐bonding. Furthermore, our results are in perfect agreement with the ΔE(HS‐LS) vs. σ(p) (+)(X) correlation reported in their work. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-03-21 2022-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9310619/ /pubmed/35224791 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/chem.202104314 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Chemistry - A European Journal published by Wiley-VCH GmbH https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Bondì, Luca Garden, Anna L. Totti, Federico Jerabek, Paul Brooker, Sally Quantitative Assessment of Ligand Substituent Effects on σ‐ and π‐Contributions to Fe−N Bonds in Spin Crossover Fe(II) Complexes |
title | Quantitative Assessment of Ligand Substituent Effects on σ‐ and π‐Contributions to Fe−N Bonds in Spin Crossover Fe(II) Complexes |
title_full | Quantitative Assessment of Ligand Substituent Effects on σ‐ and π‐Contributions to Fe−N Bonds in Spin Crossover Fe(II) Complexes |
title_fullStr | Quantitative Assessment of Ligand Substituent Effects on σ‐ and π‐Contributions to Fe−N Bonds in Spin Crossover Fe(II) Complexes |
title_full_unstemmed | Quantitative Assessment of Ligand Substituent Effects on σ‐ and π‐Contributions to Fe−N Bonds in Spin Crossover Fe(II) Complexes |
title_short | Quantitative Assessment of Ligand Substituent Effects on σ‐ and π‐Contributions to Fe−N Bonds in Spin Crossover Fe(II) Complexes |
title_sort | quantitative assessment of ligand substituent effects on σ‐ and π‐contributions to fe−n bonds in spin crossover fe(ii) complexes |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9310619/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35224791 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/chem.202104314 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bondiluca quantitativeassessmentofligandsubstituenteffectsonsandpcontributionstofenbondsinspincrossoverfeiicomplexes AT gardenannal quantitativeassessmentofligandsubstituenteffectsonsandpcontributionstofenbondsinspincrossoverfeiicomplexes AT tottifederico quantitativeassessmentofligandsubstituenteffectsonsandpcontributionstofenbondsinspincrossoverfeiicomplexes AT jerabekpaul quantitativeassessmentofligandsubstituenteffectsonsandpcontributionstofenbondsinspincrossoverfeiicomplexes AT brookersally quantitativeassessmentofligandsubstituenteffectsonsandpcontributionstofenbondsinspincrossoverfeiicomplexes |