Cargando…

Quantitative Assessment of Ligand Substituent Effects on σ‐ and π‐Contributions to Fe−N Bonds in Spin Crossover Fe(II) Complexes

The effect of para‐substituent X on the electronic structure of sixteen tridentate 4‐X‐(2,6‐di(pyrazol‐1‐yl))‐pyridine (bpp(X) ) ligands and the corresponding solution spin crossover [Fe(II)(bpp(X) )(2)](2+) complexes is analysed further, to supply quantitative insights into the effect of X on the σ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bondì, Luca, Garden, Anna L., Totti, Federico, Jerabek, Paul, Brooker, Sally
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9310619/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35224791
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/chem.202104314
_version_ 1784753426050056192
author Bondì, Luca
Garden, Anna L.
Totti, Federico
Jerabek, Paul
Brooker, Sally
author_facet Bondì, Luca
Garden, Anna L.
Totti, Federico
Jerabek, Paul
Brooker, Sally
author_sort Bondì, Luca
collection PubMed
description The effect of para‐substituent X on the electronic structure of sixteen tridentate 4‐X‐(2,6‐di(pyrazol‐1‐yl))‐pyridine (bpp(X) ) ligands and the corresponding solution spin crossover [Fe(II)(bpp(X) )(2)](2+) complexes is analysed further, to supply quantitative insights into the effect of X on the σ‐donor and π‐acceptor character of the Fe‐N(A) (pyridine) bonds. EDA‐NOCV on the sixteen LS complexes revealed that neither ΔE ( orb,σ+π ) (R(2)=0.48) nor ΔE ( orb,π ) (R(2)=0.31) correlated with the experimental solution T(1/2) values (which are expected to reflect the ligand field imposed on the iron centre), but that ΔE ( orb,σ ) correlates well (R(2)=0.82) and implies that as X changes from EDG→EWG (Electron Donating to Withdrawing Group), the ligand becomes a better σ‐donor. This counter‐intuitive result was further probed by Mulliken analysis of the N(A) atomic orbitals: N(A) (p(x) ) involved in the Fe−N σ‐bond vs. the perpendicular N(A) (p(z) ) employed in the ligand aromatic π‐system. As X changes EDG→EWG, the electron population on N(A) (p(z) ) decreases, making it a better π‐acceptor, whilst that in N(A) (p(x) ) increases, making it a better σ‐bond donor; both increase ligand field, and T(1/2) as observed. In 2016, Halcrow, Deeth and co‐workers proposed an intuitively reasonable explanation of the effect of the para‐X substituents on the T(1/2) values in this family of complexes, consistent with the calculated MO energy levels, that M→L π‐backdonation dominates in these M−L bonds. Here the quantitative EDA‐NOCV analysis of the M−L bond contributions provides a more complete, coherent and detailed picture of the relative impact of M−L σ‐versus π‐bonding in determining the observed T(1/2), refining the earlier interpretation and revealing the importance of the σ‐bonding. Furthermore, our results are in perfect agreement with the ΔE(HS‐LS) vs. σ(p) (+)(X) correlation reported in their work.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9310619
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93106192022-07-29 Quantitative Assessment of Ligand Substituent Effects on σ‐ and π‐Contributions to Fe−N Bonds in Spin Crossover Fe(II) Complexes Bondì, Luca Garden, Anna L. Totti, Federico Jerabek, Paul Brooker, Sally Chemistry Research Articles The effect of para‐substituent X on the electronic structure of sixteen tridentate 4‐X‐(2,6‐di(pyrazol‐1‐yl))‐pyridine (bpp(X) ) ligands and the corresponding solution spin crossover [Fe(II)(bpp(X) )(2)](2+) complexes is analysed further, to supply quantitative insights into the effect of X on the σ‐donor and π‐acceptor character of the Fe‐N(A) (pyridine) bonds. EDA‐NOCV on the sixteen LS complexes revealed that neither ΔE ( orb,σ+π ) (R(2)=0.48) nor ΔE ( orb,π ) (R(2)=0.31) correlated with the experimental solution T(1/2) values (which are expected to reflect the ligand field imposed on the iron centre), but that ΔE ( orb,σ ) correlates well (R(2)=0.82) and implies that as X changes from EDG→EWG (Electron Donating to Withdrawing Group), the ligand becomes a better σ‐donor. This counter‐intuitive result was further probed by Mulliken analysis of the N(A) atomic orbitals: N(A) (p(x) ) involved in the Fe−N σ‐bond vs. the perpendicular N(A) (p(z) ) employed in the ligand aromatic π‐system. As X changes EDG→EWG, the electron population on N(A) (p(z) ) decreases, making it a better π‐acceptor, whilst that in N(A) (p(x) ) increases, making it a better σ‐bond donor; both increase ligand field, and T(1/2) as observed. In 2016, Halcrow, Deeth and co‐workers proposed an intuitively reasonable explanation of the effect of the para‐X substituents on the T(1/2) values in this family of complexes, consistent with the calculated MO energy levels, that M→L π‐backdonation dominates in these M−L bonds. Here the quantitative EDA‐NOCV analysis of the M−L bond contributions provides a more complete, coherent and detailed picture of the relative impact of M−L σ‐versus π‐bonding in determining the observed T(1/2), refining the earlier interpretation and revealing the importance of the σ‐bonding. Furthermore, our results are in perfect agreement with the ΔE(HS‐LS) vs. σ(p) (+)(X) correlation reported in their work. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-03-21 2022-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9310619/ /pubmed/35224791 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/chem.202104314 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Chemistry - A European Journal published by Wiley-VCH GmbH https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Bondì, Luca
Garden, Anna L.
Totti, Federico
Jerabek, Paul
Brooker, Sally
Quantitative Assessment of Ligand Substituent Effects on σ‐ and π‐Contributions to Fe−N Bonds in Spin Crossover Fe(II) Complexes
title Quantitative Assessment of Ligand Substituent Effects on σ‐ and π‐Contributions to Fe−N Bonds in Spin Crossover Fe(II) Complexes
title_full Quantitative Assessment of Ligand Substituent Effects on σ‐ and π‐Contributions to Fe−N Bonds in Spin Crossover Fe(II) Complexes
title_fullStr Quantitative Assessment of Ligand Substituent Effects on σ‐ and π‐Contributions to Fe−N Bonds in Spin Crossover Fe(II) Complexes
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative Assessment of Ligand Substituent Effects on σ‐ and π‐Contributions to Fe−N Bonds in Spin Crossover Fe(II) Complexes
title_short Quantitative Assessment of Ligand Substituent Effects on σ‐ and π‐Contributions to Fe−N Bonds in Spin Crossover Fe(II) Complexes
title_sort quantitative assessment of ligand substituent effects on σ‐ and π‐contributions to fe−n bonds in spin crossover fe(ii) complexes
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9310619/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35224791
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/chem.202104314
work_keys_str_mv AT bondiluca quantitativeassessmentofligandsubstituenteffectsonsandpcontributionstofenbondsinspincrossoverfeiicomplexes
AT gardenannal quantitativeassessmentofligandsubstituenteffectsonsandpcontributionstofenbondsinspincrossoverfeiicomplexes
AT tottifederico quantitativeassessmentofligandsubstituenteffectsonsandpcontributionstofenbondsinspincrossoverfeiicomplexes
AT jerabekpaul quantitativeassessmentofligandsubstituenteffectsonsandpcontributionstofenbondsinspincrossoverfeiicomplexes
AT brookersally quantitativeassessmentofligandsubstituenteffectsonsandpcontributionstofenbondsinspincrossoverfeiicomplexes