Cargando…

Effects of Dietary Amylose—Amylopectin Ratio on Growth Performance and Intestinal Digestive and Absorptive Function in Weaned Piglet Response to Lipopolysaccharide

SIMPLE SUMMARY: As one of the most important components, starch has made great contributions to feed but was wasted numerously during pig feeding. This paper is designed to explore the optimal ratio of dietary amylose to amylopectin for gut health and absorption, thereby improving starch utilization...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Min, Yang, Can, Wang, Qiye, Li, Jianzhong, Li, Yali, Ding, Xueqin, Huang, Pengfei, Yang, Huansheng, Yin, Yulong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9311517/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35883380
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani12141833
_version_ 1784753612384108544
author Wang, Min
Yang, Can
Wang, Qiye
Li, Jianzhong
Li, Yali
Ding, Xueqin
Huang, Pengfei
Yang, Huansheng
Yin, Yulong
author_facet Wang, Min
Yang, Can
Wang, Qiye
Li, Jianzhong
Li, Yali
Ding, Xueqin
Huang, Pengfei
Yang, Huansheng
Yin, Yulong
author_sort Wang, Min
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: As one of the most important components, starch has made great contributions to feed but was wasted numerously during pig feeding. This paper is designed to explore the optimal ratio of dietary amylose to amylopectin for gut health and absorption, thereby improving starch utilization. Our results indicated that the dietary amylose/amylopectin ratio (AAR) of 0.60 could reduce feed conversion rate of piglets, having a certain positive significance for saving feed. In addition, under lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stress, a diet with an AAR of 0.40 to 0.60 significantly improved the intestinal health of piglets, which would provide data to support for the formulation of feed in weaned piglets during bacterial infection. ABSTRACT: This study investigated the effects of diet with different amylose–amylopectin ratios (AAR) on the growth performance, intestinal morphology, digestive enzyme activities and mRNA expression of nutrients transporters in piglets with short-term lipopolysaccharide (LPS) intraperitoneal injections. Sixty 21 days-old piglets (Landrace × Yorkshire; 6.504 ± 0.079) were randomly assigned based on their body weight (BW) and litters of origins to five groups with experimental diets with an AAR of 0.00, 0.20, 0.40, 0.60, or 0.80 (namely, the 0.00, 0.20, 0.40, and 0.80 groups), respectively. Each treatment included 12 piglets (one piglet per pen). This experiment lasted for 28 days. On the 28th day, six piglets in each treatment were randomly selected for an LPS intraperitoneal injection (100 μg/kg BW), and other piglets were injected with normal saline. Twelve hours after LPS injection, all piglets were sacrificed to collect small intestinal mucosa for analysis. Although different AAR did not influence the final BW in piglets, the piglets in the 0.40 group represented the poorest feed-to-gain ratio (F/G) in the first, second and fourth week (p < 0.05) and the lowest average daily gain (ADG) in the fourth week (p < 0.05) compared with other groups. In terms of the small intestinal morphology, piglets in the 0.20 and 0.60 groups showed better ileal villous width (p < 0.05). Piglets in the 0.60 group presented greater activities of jejunal maltase, sucrase and alkaline phosphatase (p < 0.05) than those of 0.20 and 0.40. However, a low amylose diet increased the mRNA expression of jejunal glucose and amino acid transporters (p < 0.05). In addition, compared to saline injection, the LPS challenge significantly lessened jejunal digestive enzyme activities (p < 0.01) and, ileal villous width and downregulated the gene expression of glucose and amino acid transporters (p < 0.05) in piglets. Interestingly, certain diet -LPS interactions on duodenal VH/CD, jejunal maltase activity (p < 0.05) and the expression of glucose transporters (p < 0.05) were observed. Taken together, in terms of small intestinal digestion and absorption capacity, these results demonstrated that a diet with an AAR of 0.60 diets could improve the intestinal digestive and absorptive capability by affecting small intestinal morphology, digestive enzymes, and nutrients absorptions in piglets. In addition, the diets containing an AAR of 0.40–0.60 were more likely to resist the damage of LPS stress to intestinal morphology and nutrient absorption.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9311517
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93115172022-07-26 Effects of Dietary Amylose—Amylopectin Ratio on Growth Performance and Intestinal Digestive and Absorptive Function in Weaned Piglet Response to Lipopolysaccharide Wang, Min Yang, Can Wang, Qiye Li, Jianzhong Li, Yali Ding, Xueqin Huang, Pengfei Yang, Huansheng Yin, Yulong Animals (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: As one of the most important components, starch has made great contributions to feed but was wasted numerously during pig feeding. This paper is designed to explore the optimal ratio of dietary amylose to amylopectin for gut health and absorption, thereby improving starch utilization. Our results indicated that the dietary amylose/amylopectin ratio (AAR) of 0.60 could reduce feed conversion rate of piglets, having a certain positive significance for saving feed. In addition, under lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stress, a diet with an AAR of 0.40 to 0.60 significantly improved the intestinal health of piglets, which would provide data to support for the formulation of feed in weaned piglets during bacterial infection. ABSTRACT: This study investigated the effects of diet with different amylose–amylopectin ratios (AAR) on the growth performance, intestinal morphology, digestive enzyme activities and mRNA expression of nutrients transporters in piglets with short-term lipopolysaccharide (LPS) intraperitoneal injections. Sixty 21 days-old piglets (Landrace × Yorkshire; 6.504 ± 0.079) were randomly assigned based on their body weight (BW) and litters of origins to five groups with experimental diets with an AAR of 0.00, 0.20, 0.40, 0.60, or 0.80 (namely, the 0.00, 0.20, 0.40, and 0.80 groups), respectively. Each treatment included 12 piglets (one piglet per pen). This experiment lasted for 28 days. On the 28th day, six piglets in each treatment were randomly selected for an LPS intraperitoneal injection (100 μg/kg BW), and other piglets were injected with normal saline. Twelve hours after LPS injection, all piglets were sacrificed to collect small intestinal mucosa for analysis. Although different AAR did not influence the final BW in piglets, the piglets in the 0.40 group represented the poorest feed-to-gain ratio (F/G) in the first, second and fourth week (p < 0.05) and the lowest average daily gain (ADG) in the fourth week (p < 0.05) compared with other groups. In terms of the small intestinal morphology, piglets in the 0.20 and 0.60 groups showed better ileal villous width (p < 0.05). Piglets in the 0.60 group presented greater activities of jejunal maltase, sucrase and alkaline phosphatase (p < 0.05) than those of 0.20 and 0.40. However, a low amylose diet increased the mRNA expression of jejunal glucose and amino acid transporters (p < 0.05). In addition, compared to saline injection, the LPS challenge significantly lessened jejunal digestive enzyme activities (p < 0.01) and, ileal villous width and downregulated the gene expression of glucose and amino acid transporters (p < 0.05) in piglets. Interestingly, certain diet -LPS interactions on duodenal VH/CD, jejunal maltase activity (p < 0.05) and the expression of glucose transporters (p < 0.05) were observed. Taken together, in terms of small intestinal digestion and absorption capacity, these results demonstrated that a diet with an AAR of 0.60 diets could improve the intestinal digestive and absorptive capability by affecting small intestinal morphology, digestive enzymes, and nutrients absorptions in piglets. In addition, the diets containing an AAR of 0.40–0.60 were more likely to resist the damage of LPS stress to intestinal morphology and nutrient absorption. MDPI 2022-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9311517/ /pubmed/35883380 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani12141833 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Wang, Min
Yang, Can
Wang, Qiye
Li, Jianzhong
Li, Yali
Ding, Xueqin
Huang, Pengfei
Yang, Huansheng
Yin, Yulong
Effects of Dietary Amylose—Amylopectin Ratio on Growth Performance and Intestinal Digestive and Absorptive Function in Weaned Piglet Response to Lipopolysaccharide
title Effects of Dietary Amylose—Amylopectin Ratio on Growth Performance and Intestinal Digestive and Absorptive Function in Weaned Piglet Response to Lipopolysaccharide
title_full Effects of Dietary Amylose—Amylopectin Ratio on Growth Performance and Intestinal Digestive and Absorptive Function in Weaned Piglet Response to Lipopolysaccharide
title_fullStr Effects of Dietary Amylose—Amylopectin Ratio on Growth Performance and Intestinal Digestive and Absorptive Function in Weaned Piglet Response to Lipopolysaccharide
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Dietary Amylose—Amylopectin Ratio on Growth Performance and Intestinal Digestive and Absorptive Function in Weaned Piglet Response to Lipopolysaccharide
title_short Effects of Dietary Amylose—Amylopectin Ratio on Growth Performance and Intestinal Digestive and Absorptive Function in Weaned Piglet Response to Lipopolysaccharide
title_sort effects of dietary amylose—amylopectin ratio on growth performance and intestinal digestive and absorptive function in weaned piglet response to lipopolysaccharide
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9311517/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35883380
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani12141833
work_keys_str_mv AT wangmin effectsofdietaryamyloseamylopectinratioongrowthperformanceandintestinaldigestiveandabsorptivefunctioninweanedpigletresponsetolipopolysaccharide
AT yangcan effectsofdietaryamyloseamylopectinratioongrowthperformanceandintestinaldigestiveandabsorptivefunctioninweanedpigletresponsetolipopolysaccharide
AT wangqiye effectsofdietaryamyloseamylopectinratioongrowthperformanceandintestinaldigestiveandabsorptivefunctioninweanedpigletresponsetolipopolysaccharide
AT lijianzhong effectsofdietaryamyloseamylopectinratioongrowthperformanceandintestinaldigestiveandabsorptivefunctioninweanedpigletresponsetolipopolysaccharide
AT liyali effectsofdietaryamyloseamylopectinratioongrowthperformanceandintestinaldigestiveandabsorptivefunctioninweanedpigletresponsetolipopolysaccharide
AT dingxueqin effectsofdietaryamyloseamylopectinratioongrowthperformanceandintestinaldigestiveandabsorptivefunctioninweanedpigletresponsetolipopolysaccharide
AT huangpengfei effectsofdietaryamyloseamylopectinratioongrowthperformanceandintestinaldigestiveandabsorptivefunctioninweanedpigletresponsetolipopolysaccharide
AT yanghuansheng effectsofdietaryamyloseamylopectinratioongrowthperformanceandintestinaldigestiveandabsorptivefunctioninweanedpigletresponsetolipopolysaccharide
AT yinyulong effectsofdietaryamyloseamylopectinratioongrowthperformanceandintestinaldigestiveandabsorptivefunctioninweanedpigletresponsetolipopolysaccharide