Cargando…
Differences in Antioxidant Potential of Allium cepa Husk of Red, Yellow, and White Varieties
The effective management of agro-industry organic waste for developing high-commercial-value products is a promising facet of the circular economy. Annually, more than 550,000 tons of waste that is potentially rich in biologically active substances is generated worldwide while processing onions (All...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9311763/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35883734 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antiox11071243 |
_version_ | 1784753673141747712 |
---|---|
author | Chernukha, Irina Kupaeva, Nadezhda Kotenkova, Elena Khvostov, Daniil |
author_facet | Chernukha, Irina Kupaeva, Nadezhda Kotenkova, Elena Khvostov, Daniil |
author_sort | Chernukha, Irina |
collection | PubMed |
description | The effective management of agro-industry organic waste for developing high-commercial-value products is a promising facet of the circular economy. Annually, more than 550,000 tons of waste that is potentially rich in biologically active substances is generated worldwide while processing onions (Allium cepa L.). The antioxidant potential of red, yellow, and white onion husks was studied using FRAP, ORAC, chemiluminescence, and UPLC-ESI-Q-TOF-MS analysis methods. The extraction of phenolic compounds from onion husks was more effective when using an aqueous solution of 70% ethanol as compared with water. Ethanolic extract from red onion husks exhibited the highest TAC(ORAC) and TAC(FRAP) values, averaging 2017.34 µmol-equiv. Trolox/g raw material and 2050.23 µmol-equiv. DQ/g raw material, respectively, while the white onion exhibited much lower levels of antioxidants. According to the chemiluminescence results, it was determined that the red and yellow onion husks contained antioxidants of three types of power, while white onion husks only contained medium and weak types. The highest content of flavonoids was found in red onion husks, averaging 1915.90 ± 9.92 µg-eq. DQ/g of raw material and 321.42 ± 2.61 µg-eq. DQ/g of raw material for ethanol and water, respectively, while yellow onion husks exhibited 544.06 ± 2.73 µg-eq. DQ/g of raw material and 89.41 ± 2.08 for ethanol and water, respectively. Quercetin and its glycosides were the most representative flavonoids, and a number of substances with different pharmacological and biological properties were also identified. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9311763 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93117632022-07-26 Differences in Antioxidant Potential of Allium cepa Husk of Red, Yellow, and White Varieties Chernukha, Irina Kupaeva, Nadezhda Kotenkova, Elena Khvostov, Daniil Antioxidants (Basel) Article The effective management of agro-industry organic waste for developing high-commercial-value products is a promising facet of the circular economy. Annually, more than 550,000 tons of waste that is potentially rich in biologically active substances is generated worldwide while processing onions (Allium cepa L.). The antioxidant potential of red, yellow, and white onion husks was studied using FRAP, ORAC, chemiluminescence, and UPLC-ESI-Q-TOF-MS analysis methods. The extraction of phenolic compounds from onion husks was more effective when using an aqueous solution of 70% ethanol as compared with water. Ethanolic extract from red onion husks exhibited the highest TAC(ORAC) and TAC(FRAP) values, averaging 2017.34 µmol-equiv. Trolox/g raw material and 2050.23 µmol-equiv. DQ/g raw material, respectively, while the white onion exhibited much lower levels of antioxidants. According to the chemiluminescence results, it was determined that the red and yellow onion husks contained antioxidants of three types of power, while white onion husks only contained medium and weak types. The highest content of flavonoids was found in red onion husks, averaging 1915.90 ± 9.92 µg-eq. DQ/g of raw material and 321.42 ± 2.61 µg-eq. DQ/g of raw material for ethanol and water, respectively, while yellow onion husks exhibited 544.06 ± 2.73 µg-eq. DQ/g of raw material and 89.41 ± 2.08 for ethanol and water, respectively. Quercetin and its glycosides were the most representative flavonoids, and a number of substances with different pharmacological and biological properties were also identified. MDPI 2022-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9311763/ /pubmed/35883734 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antiox11071243 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Chernukha, Irina Kupaeva, Nadezhda Kotenkova, Elena Khvostov, Daniil Differences in Antioxidant Potential of Allium cepa Husk of Red, Yellow, and White Varieties |
title | Differences in Antioxidant Potential of Allium cepa Husk of Red, Yellow, and White Varieties |
title_full | Differences in Antioxidant Potential of Allium cepa Husk of Red, Yellow, and White Varieties |
title_fullStr | Differences in Antioxidant Potential of Allium cepa Husk of Red, Yellow, and White Varieties |
title_full_unstemmed | Differences in Antioxidant Potential of Allium cepa Husk of Red, Yellow, and White Varieties |
title_short | Differences in Antioxidant Potential of Allium cepa Husk of Red, Yellow, and White Varieties |
title_sort | differences in antioxidant potential of allium cepa husk of red, yellow, and white varieties |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9311763/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35883734 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antiox11071243 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chernukhairina differencesinantioxidantpotentialofalliumcepahuskofredyellowandwhitevarieties AT kupaevanadezhda differencesinantioxidantpotentialofalliumcepahuskofredyellowandwhitevarieties AT kotenkovaelena differencesinantioxidantpotentialofalliumcepahuskofredyellowandwhitevarieties AT khvostovdaniil differencesinantioxidantpotentialofalliumcepahuskofredyellowandwhitevarieties |