Cargando…

Kenya’s informal milk markets and the regulation–reality gap

MOTIVATION: Around 80% of milk in Kenya is marketed informally, providing livelihoods and contributing to the food security and nutrition of low‐income consumers. Government policy, however, is focused on formalization—primarily through licensing and pasteurization—with enforcement via fines, confis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Blackmore, Emma, Guarin, Alejandro, Vorley, William, Alonso, Silvia, Grace, Delia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9313611/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35915629
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12581
_version_ 1784754121786523648
author Blackmore, Emma
Guarin, Alejandro
Vorley, William
Alonso, Silvia
Grace, Delia
author_facet Blackmore, Emma
Guarin, Alejandro
Vorley, William
Alonso, Silvia
Grace, Delia
author_sort Blackmore, Emma
collection PubMed
description MOTIVATION: Around 80% of milk in Kenya is marketed informally, providing livelihoods and contributing to the food security and nutrition of low‐income consumers. Government policy, however, is focused on formalization—primarily through licensing and pasteurization—with enforcement via fines, confiscation of milk, or closing the premises of informal actors. PURPOSE: This article seeks to better understand if, and why, Kenya’s informal milk sector and regulatory system are disconnected from one another and how the policy–reality gap might be better bridged. METHODS AND APPROACH: To understand the nature and performance of Kenya’s informal milk markets and their governance, we used a mix of research methods and data sources, including surveys with informal market players, and key informant interviews with key sector stakeholders. Fieldwork was carried out in Nairobi in late 2018. FINDINGS: Milk safety and quality matters to all actors in informal milk value chains. The trust‐based system used is effective in moderating behaviours and assessing and prioritizing quality and safety. Government policy is not accomplishing the stated goal of formalization: licensing levels remain low among informal actors. Pasteurization is not rewarded in the market. There is some evidence of suboptimal pasteurization processes being undertaken to satisfy regulators. There is a gap between the reality of Kenya’s informal milk sector and its regulatory system. POLICY IMPLICATIONS: The regulation–reality gap manifests itself as adversarial relationships between regulators and informal actors, and unnecessary transaction costs, missing opportunities for enhancing livelihoods, food safety, and food security. New approaches should build on and consider existing approaches taken by actors in informal food markets to ensure food safety and quality. Policy‐makers should seek to communicate more effectively with informal actors and engage in more constructive dialogue on inclusive ways forward.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9313611
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93136112022-07-30 Kenya’s informal milk markets and the regulation–reality gap Blackmore, Emma Guarin, Alejandro Vorley, William Alonso, Silvia Grace, Delia Dev Policy Rev Articles MOTIVATION: Around 80% of milk in Kenya is marketed informally, providing livelihoods and contributing to the food security and nutrition of low‐income consumers. Government policy, however, is focused on formalization—primarily through licensing and pasteurization—with enforcement via fines, confiscation of milk, or closing the premises of informal actors. PURPOSE: This article seeks to better understand if, and why, Kenya’s informal milk sector and regulatory system are disconnected from one another and how the policy–reality gap might be better bridged. METHODS AND APPROACH: To understand the nature and performance of Kenya’s informal milk markets and their governance, we used a mix of research methods and data sources, including surveys with informal market players, and key informant interviews with key sector stakeholders. Fieldwork was carried out in Nairobi in late 2018. FINDINGS: Milk safety and quality matters to all actors in informal milk value chains. The trust‐based system used is effective in moderating behaviours and assessing and prioritizing quality and safety. Government policy is not accomplishing the stated goal of formalization: licensing levels remain low among informal actors. Pasteurization is not rewarded in the market. There is some evidence of suboptimal pasteurization processes being undertaken to satisfy regulators. There is a gap between the reality of Kenya’s informal milk sector and its regulatory system. POLICY IMPLICATIONS: The regulation–reality gap manifests itself as adversarial relationships between regulators and informal actors, and unnecessary transaction costs, missing opportunities for enhancing livelihoods, food safety, and food security. New approaches should build on and consider existing approaches taken by actors in informal food markets to ensure food safety and quality. Policy‐makers should seek to communicate more effectively with informal actors and engage in more constructive dialogue on inclusive ways forward. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-03-01 2022-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9313611/ /pubmed/35915629 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12581 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Development Policy Review published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Overseas Development Institute https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Articles
Blackmore, Emma
Guarin, Alejandro
Vorley, William
Alonso, Silvia
Grace, Delia
Kenya’s informal milk markets and the regulation–reality gap
title Kenya’s informal milk markets and the regulation–reality gap
title_full Kenya’s informal milk markets and the regulation–reality gap
title_fullStr Kenya’s informal milk markets and the regulation–reality gap
title_full_unstemmed Kenya’s informal milk markets and the regulation–reality gap
title_short Kenya’s informal milk markets and the regulation–reality gap
title_sort kenya’s informal milk markets and the regulation–reality gap
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9313611/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35915629
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12581
work_keys_str_mv AT blackmoreemma kenyasinformalmilkmarketsandtheregulationrealitygap
AT guarinalejandro kenyasinformalmilkmarketsandtheregulationrealitygap
AT vorleywilliam kenyasinformalmilkmarketsandtheregulationrealitygap
AT alonsosilvia kenyasinformalmilkmarketsandtheregulationrealitygap
AT gracedelia kenyasinformalmilkmarketsandtheregulationrealitygap