Cargando…

Potential for Front of Pack Labeling Exposure to Impact US Dietary Choices: A Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study Using NHANES 2017–2018

In recent years, front-of-pack nutrition labeling (FOPL) schemes have proliferated, but the components of the diet subject to FOPL have not been described. This study quantified the proportion and elements of the diet that would be subject to FOPL in the US. The 2017–2018 National Health and Nutriti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roark, Elizabeth K., Rehm, Colin D., Sherry, Christina L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9316916/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35889951
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu14142995
_version_ 1784754930425266176
author Roark, Elizabeth K.
Rehm, Colin D.
Sherry, Christina L.
author_facet Roark, Elizabeth K.
Rehm, Colin D.
Sherry, Christina L.
author_sort Roark, Elizabeth K.
collection PubMed
description In recent years, front-of-pack nutrition labeling (FOPL) schemes have proliferated, but the components of the diet subject to FOPL have not been described. This study quantified the proportion and elements of the diet that would be subject to FOPL in the US. The 2017–2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (n = 7121; age ≥2 year) 24-h dietary recalls were used to identify foods/beverages subject to FOPL. The proportion of dietary energy and additional dietary constituents subject to FOPL was estimated. Overall, 57% of dietary energy would be subject to FOPL. Individuals consuming more away-from-home meals had lower exposure to FOPL. Adults with a healthy-weight and those consuming a more healthful diet had more exposure to FOPL. Protein, sodium, potassium, whole fruit, vegetables, and unprocessed meats were less subject to FOPL as compared to total sugars, added sugars, calcium, fruit juice, milk, yogurt, nuts/seeds and whole grains. Because less than 60% of the diet would be impacted by FOPL, implementation of such a policy may have limited reach for the US diet and demonstrates some inconsistencies with current dietary guidance regarding the under- and over-representation of key food groups and nutrients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9316916
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93169162022-07-27 Potential for Front of Pack Labeling Exposure to Impact US Dietary Choices: A Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study Using NHANES 2017–2018 Roark, Elizabeth K. Rehm, Colin D. Sherry, Christina L. Nutrients Article In recent years, front-of-pack nutrition labeling (FOPL) schemes have proliferated, but the components of the diet subject to FOPL have not been described. This study quantified the proportion and elements of the diet that would be subject to FOPL in the US. The 2017–2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (n = 7121; age ≥2 year) 24-h dietary recalls were used to identify foods/beverages subject to FOPL. The proportion of dietary energy and additional dietary constituents subject to FOPL was estimated. Overall, 57% of dietary energy would be subject to FOPL. Individuals consuming more away-from-home meals had lower exposure to FOPL. Adults with a healthy-weight and those consuming a more healthful diet had more exposure to FOPL. Protein, sodium, potassium, whole fruit, vegetables, and unprocessed meats were less subject to FOPL as compared to total sugars, added sugars, calcium, fruit juice, milk, yogurt, nuts/seeds and whole grains. Because less than 60% of the diet would be impacted by FOPL, implementation of such a policy may have limited reach for the US diet and demonstrates some inconsistencies with current dietary guidance regarding the under- and over-representation of key food groups and nutrients. MDPI 2022-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9316916/ /pubmed/35889951 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu14142995 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Roark, Elizabeth K.
Rehm, Colin D.
Sherry, Christina L.
Potential for Front of Pack Labeling Exposure to Impact US Dietary Choices: A Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study Using NHANES 2017–2018
title Potential for Front of Pack Labeling Exposure to Impact US Dietary Choices: A Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study Using NHANES 2017–2018
title_full Potential for Front of Pack Labeling Exposure to Impact US Dietary Choices: A Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study Using NHANES 2017–2018
title_fullStr Potential for Front of Pack Labeling Exposure to Impact US Dietary Choices: A Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study Using NHANES 2017–2018
title_full_unstemmed Potential for Front of Pack Labeling Exposure to Impact US Dietary Choices: A Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study Using NHANES 2017–2018
title_short Potential for Front of Pack Labeling Exposure to Impact US Dietary Choices: A Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study Using NHANES 2017–2018
title_sort potential for front of pack labeling exposure to impact us dietary choices: a population-based cross-sectional study using nhanes 2017–2018
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9316916/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35889951
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu14142995
work_keys_str_mv AT roarkelizabethk potentialforfrontofpacklabelingexposuretoimpactusdietarychoicesapopulationbasedcrosssectionalstudyusingnhanes20172018
AT rehmcolind potentialforfrontofpacklabelingexposuretoimpactusdietarychoicesapopulationbasedcrosssectionalstudyusingnhanes20172018
AT sherrychristinal potentialforfrontofpacklabelingexposuretoimpactusdietarychoicesapopulationbasedcrosssectionalstudyusingnhanes20172018