Cargando…

Binding Studies and Lead Generation of Pteridin-7(8H)-one Derivatives Targeting FLT3

Ligand modification by substituting chemical groups within the binding pocket is a popular strategy for kinase drug development. In this study, a series of pteridin-7(8H)-one derivatives targeting wild-type FMS-like tyrosine kinase-3 (FLT3) and its D835Y mutant (FL3(D835Y)) were studied using a comb...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ghosh, Suparna, Cho, Seung Joo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9319409/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35887060
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms23147696
Descripción
Sumario:Ligand modification by substituting chemical groups within the binding pocket is a popular strategy for kinase drug development. In this study, a series of pteridin-7(8H)-one derivatives targeting wild-type FMS-like tyrosine kinase-3 (FLT3) and its D835Y mutant (FL3(D835Y)) were studied using a combination of molecular modeling techniques, such as docking, molecular dynamics (MD), binding energy calculation, and three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship (3D-QSAR) studies. We determined the protein–ligand binding affinity by employing molecular mechanics Poisson–Boltzmann/generalized Born surface area (MM-PB/GBSA), fast pulling ligand (FPL) simulation, linear interaction energy (LIE), umbrella sampling (US), and free energy perturbation (FEP) scoring functions. The structure–activity relationship (SAR) study was conducted using comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) and comparative molecular similarity indices analysis (CoMSIA), and the results were emphasized as a SAR scheme. In both the CoMFA and CoMSIA models, satisfactory correlation statistics were obtained between the observed and predicted inhibitory activity. The MD and SAR models were co-utilized to design several new compounds, and their inhibitory activities were anticipated using the CoMSIA model. The designed compounds with higher predicted pIC(50) values than the most active compound were carried out for binding free energy evaluation to wild-type and mutant receptors using MM-PB/GBSA, LIE, and FEP methods.