Cargando…

A mixed methods evaluation of the acceptability of therapy using LEGO® bricks (LEGO® based therapy) in mainstream primary and secondary education

Many autistic children and young people need extra support with social skills. Social skills programmes, such as LEGO® based therapy (LBT), are commonly used to help with these difficulties. The aim of this study was to examine the acceptability of LBT using qualitative interviews and questionnaires...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barr, Amy, Coates, Elizabeth, Kingsley, Ellen, de la Cuesta, Gina Gomez, Biggs, Katie, Le Couteur, Ann, Wright, Barry
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9324108/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35396821
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aur.2725
_version_ 1784756726165143552
author Barr, Amy
Coates, Elizabeth
Kingsley, Ellen
de la Cuesta, Gina Gomez
Biggs, Katie
Le Couteur, Ann
Wright, Barry
author_facet Barr, Amy
Coates, Elizabeth
Kingsley, Ellen
de la Cuesta, Gina Gomez
Biggs, Katie
Le Couteur, Ann
Wright, Barry
author_sort Barr, Amy
collection PubMed
description Many autistic children and young people need extra support with social skills. Social skills programmes, such as LEGO® based therapy (LBT), are commonly used to help with these difficulties. The aim of this study was to examine the acceptability of LBT using qualitative interviews and questionnaires with facilitators and parents/guardians on behalf of autistic children and young people. Acceptability was measured in line with constructs of the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability. Questionnaires were analyzed descriptively and between group comparisons were undertaken using the Mann–Whitney U Test. Telephone interviews were undertaken with a sub‐sample of facilitators. All interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and framework analysis was performed by two researchers supported by NVivo. The questionnaire response rate was 80% for facilitators and 77% for parents/guardians. Overall acceptability, measured on a 1–5 (minimum–maximum) scale, was high for both facilitators and parents/guardians with a median (range) of 5 (4–5) and 4 (3–5), respectively. Facilitators rated the acceptability of the programme significantly higher overall than parents (p < 0.001). Facilitators reported that participants and wider school staff viewed the programme positively. They observed improvements in communication and social skills during the sessions. Potential barriers to programme delivery, such as resources and staff schedules, were identified but facilitators reported that these challenges did not outweigh the benefits. There is increasing emphasis on the role of schools in seeking to improve social outcomes for autistic children therefore this high degree of acceptability makes this an attractive school‐based programme for schools, autistic children and their families. LAY SUMMARY: Social skills programmes, such as LEGO® based therapy (LBT), are often used to help autistic children and young people with their social skills. The acceptability of LBT with school staff and parents/guardians on behalf of children and young people was explored using interviews and questionnaires. Our results show that LBT is viewed as a highly acceptable programme that can help autistic children and young people improve their communication and social skills.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9324108
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93241082022-07-30 A mixed methods evaluation of the acceptability of therapy using LEGO® bricks (LEGO® based therapy) in mainstream primary and secondary education Barr, Amy Coates, Elizabeth Kingsley, Ellen de la Cuesta, Gina Gomez Biggs, Katie Le Couteur, Ann Wright, Barry Autism Res PSYCHOLOGY Many autistic children and young people need extra support with social skills. Social skills programmes, such as LEGO® based therapy (LBT), are commonly used to help with these difficulties. The aim of this study was to examine the acceptability of LBT using qualitative interviews and questionnaires with facilitators and parents/guardians on behalf of autistic children and young people. Acceptability was measured in line with constructs of the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability. Questionnaires were analyzed descriptively and between group comparisons were undertaken using the Mann–Whitney U Test. Telephone interviews were undertaken with a sub‐sample of facilitators. All interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and framework analysis was performed by two researchers supported by NVivo. The questionnaire response rate was 80% for facilitators and 77% for parents/guardians. Overall acceptability, measured on a 1–5 (minimum–maximum) scale, was high for both facilitators and parents/guardians with a median (range) of 5 (4–5) and 4 (3–5), respectively. Facilitators rated the acceptability of the programme significantly higher overall than parents (p < 0.001). Facilitators reported that participants and wider school staff viewed the programme positively. They observed improvements in communication and social skills during the sessions. Potential barriers to programme delivery, such as resources and staff schedules, were identified but facilitators reported that these challenges did not outweigh the benefits. There is increasing emphasis on the role of schools in seeking to improve social outcomes for autistic children therefore this high degree of acceptability makes this an attractive school‐based programme for schools, autistic children and their families. LAY SUMMARY: Social skills programmes, such as LEGO® based therapy (LBT), are often used to help autistic children and young people with their social skills. The acceptability of LBT with school staff and parents/guardians on behalf of children and young people was explored using interviews and questionnaires. Our results show that LBT is viewed as a highly acceptable programme that can help autistic children and young people improve their communication and social skills. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022-04-09 2022-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9324108/ /pubmed/35396821 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aur.2725 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Autism Research published by International Society for Autism Research and Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle PSYCHOLOGY
Barr, Amy
Coates, Elizabeth
Kingsley, Ellen
de la Cuesta, Gina Gomez
Biggs, Katie
Le Couteur, Ann
Wright, Barry
A mixed methods evaluation of the acceptability of therapy using LEGO® bricks (LEGO® based therapy) in mainstream primary and secondary education
title A mixed methods evaluation of the acceptability of therapy using LEGO® bricks (LEGO® based therapy) in mainstream primary and secondary education
title_full A mixed methods evaluation of the acceptability of therapy using LEGO® bricks (LEGO® based therapy) in mainstream primary and secondary education
title_fullStr A mixed methods evaluation of the acceptability of therapy using LEGO® bricks (LEGO® based therapy) in mainstream primary and secondary education
title_full_unstemmed A mixed methods evaluation of the acceptability of therapy using LEGO® bricks (LEGO® based therapy) in mainstream primary and secondary education
title_short A mixed methods evaluation of the acceptability of therapy using LEGO® bricks (LEGO® based therapy) in mainstream primary and secondary education
title_sort mixed methods evaluation of the acceptability of therapy using lego® bricks (lego® based therapy) in mainstream primary and secondary education
topic PSYCHOLOGY
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9324108/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35396821
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aur.2725
work_keys_str_mv AT barramy amixedmethodsevaluationoftheacceptabilityoftherapyusinglegobrickslegobasedtherapyinmainstreamprimaryandsecondaryeducation
AT coateselizabeth amixedmethodsevaluationoftheacceptabilityoftherapyusinglegobrickslegobasedtherapyinmainstreamprimaryandsecondaryeducation
AT kingsleyellen amixedmethodsevaluationoftheacceptabilityoftherapyusinglegobrickslegobasedtherapyinmainstreamprimaryandsecondaryeducation
AT delacuestaginagomez amixedmethodsevaluationoftheacceptabilityoftherapyusinglegobrickslegobasedtherapyinmainstreamprimaryandsecondaryeducation
AT biggskatie amixedmethodsevaluationoftheacceptabilityoftherapyusinglegobrickslegobasedtherapyinmainstreamprimaryandsecondaryeducation
AT lecouteurann amixedmethodsevaluationoftheacceptabilityoftherapyusinglegobrickslegobasedtherapyinmainstreamprimaryandsecondaryeducation
AT wrightbarry amixedmethodsevaluationoftheacceptabilityoftherapyusinglegobrickslegobasedtherapyinmainstreamprimaryandsecondaryeducation
AT barramy mixedmethodsevaluationoftheacceptabilityoftherapyusinglegobrickslegobasedtherapyinmainstreamprimaryandsecondaryeducation
AT coateselizabeth mixedmethodsevaluationoftheacceptabilityoftherapyusinglegobrickslegobasedtherapyinmainstreamprimaryandsecondaryeducation
AT kingsleyellen mixedmethodsevaluationoftheacceptabilityoftherapyusinglegobrickslegobasedtherapyinmainstreamprimaryandsecondaryeducation
AT delacuestaginagomez mixedmethodsevaluationoftheacceptabilityoftherapyusinglegobrickslegobasedtherapyinmainstreamprimaryandsecondaryeducation
AT biggskatie mixedmethodsevaluationoftheacceptabilityoftherapyusinglegobrickslegobasedtherapyinmainstreamprimaryandsecondaryeducation
AT lecouteurann mixedmethodsevaluationoftheacceptabilityoftherapyusinglegobrickslegobasedtherapyinmainstreamprimaryandsecondaryeducation
AT wrightbarry mixedmethodsevaluationoftheacceptabilityoftherapyusinglegobrickslegobasedtherapyinmainstreamprimaryandsecondaryeducation