Cargando…
Quantifying Biomolecular Interactions Using Slow Mixing Mode (SLOMO) Nanoflow ESI-MS
[Image: see text] Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) is a powerful label-free assay for detecting noncovalent biomolecular complexes in vitro and is increasingly used to quantify binding thermochemistry. A common assumption made in ESI-MS affinity measurements is that the relative io...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Chemical Society
2022
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9335916/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35912341 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.2c00215 |
_version_ | 1784759436766609408 |
---|---|
author | Bui, Duong T. Li, Zhixiong Kitov, Pavel I. Han, Ling Kitova, Elena N. Fortier, Marlène Fuselier, Camille Granger Joly de Boissel, Philippine Chatenet, David Doucet, Nicolas Tompkins, Stephen M. St-Pierre, Yves Mahal, Lara K. Klassen, John S. |
author_facet | Bui, Duong T. Li, Zhixiong Kitov, Pavel I. Han, Ling Kitova, Elena N. Fortier, Marlène Fuselier, Camille Granger Joly de Boissel, Philippine Chatenet, David Doucet, Nicolas Tompkins, Stephen M. St-Pierre, Yves Mahal, Lara K. Klassen, John S. |
author_sort | Bui, Duong T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Image: see text] Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) is a powerful label-free assay for detecting noncovalent biomolecular complexes in vitro and is increasingly used to quantify binding thermochemistry. A common assumption made in ESI-MS affinity measurements is that the relative ion signals of free and bound species quantitatively reflect their relative concentrations in solution. However, this is valid only when the interacting species and their complexes have similar ESI-MS response factors (RFs). For many biomolecular complexes, such as protein–protein interactions, this condition is not satisfied. Existing strategies to correct for nonuniform RFs are generally incompatible with static nanoflow ESI (nanoESI) sources, which are typically used for biomolecular interaction studies, thereby significantly limiting the utility of ESI-MS. Here, we introduce slow mixing mode (SLOMO) nanoESI-MS, a direct technique that allows both the RF and affinity (K(d)) for a biomolecular interaction to be determined from a single measurement using static nanoESI. The approach relies on the continuous monitoring of interacting species and their complexes under nonhomogeneous solution conditions. Changes in ion signals of free and bound species as the system approaches or moves away from a steady-state condition allow the relative RFs of the free and bound species to be determined. Combining the relative RF and the relative abundances measured under equilibrium conditions enables the K(d) to be calculated. The reliability of SLOMO and its ease of use is demonstrated through affinity measurements performed on peptide–antibiotic, protease–protein inhibitor, and protein oligomerization systems. Finally, affinities measured for the binding of human and bacterial lectins to a nanobody, a viral glycoprotein, and glycolipids displayed within a model membrane highlight the tremendous power and versatility of SLOMO for accurately quantifying a wide range of biomolecular interactions important to human health and disease. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9335916 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | American Chemical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93359162022-07-30 Quantifying Biomolecular Interactions Using Slow Mixing Mode (SLOMO) Nanoflow ESI-MS Bui, Duong T. Li, Zhixiong Kitov, Pavel I. Han, Ling Kitova, Elena N. Fortier, Marlène Fuselier, Camille Granger Joly de Boissel, Philippine Chatenet, David Doucet, Nicolas Tompkins, Stephen M. St-Pierre, Yves Mahal, Lara K. Klassen, John S. ACS Cent Sci [Image: see text] Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) is a powerful label-free assay for detecting noncovalent biomolecular complexes in vitro and is increasingly used to quantify binding thermochemistry. A common assumption made in ESI-MS affinity measurements is that the relative ion signals of free and bound species quantitatively reflect their relative concentrations in solution. However, this is valid only when the interacting species and their complexes have similar ESI-MS response factors (RFs). For many biomolecular complexes, such as protein–protein interactions, this condition is not satisfied. Existing strategies to correct for nonuniform RFs are generally incompatible with static nanoflow ESI (nanoESI) sources, which are typically used for biomolecular interaction studies, thereby significantly limiting the utility of ESI-MS. Here, we introduce slow mixing mode (SLOMO) nanoESI-MS, a direct technique that allows both the RF and affinity (K(d)) for a biomolecular interaction to be determined from a single measurement using static nanoESI. The approach relies on the continuous monitoring of interacting species and their complexes under nonhomogeneous solution conditions. Changes in ion signals of free and bound species as the system approaches or moves away from a steady-state condition allow the relative RFs of the free and bound species to be determined. Combining the relative RF and the relative abundances measured under equilibrium conditions enables the K(d) to be calculated. The reliability of SLOMO and its ease of use is demonstrated through affinity measurements performed on peptide–antibiotic, protease–protein inhibitor, and protein oligomerization systems. Finally, affinities measured for the binding of human and bacterial lectins to a nanobody, a viral glycoprotein, and glycolipids displayed within a model membrane highlight the tremendous power and versatility of SLOMO for accurately quantifying a wide range of biomolecular interactions important to human health and disease. American Chemical Society 2022-07-06 2022-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9335916/ /pubmed/35912341 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.2c00215 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Permits non-commercial access and re-use, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained; but does not permit creation of adaptations or other derivative works (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Bui, Duong T. Li, Zhixiong Kitov, Pavel I. Han, Ling Kitova, Elena N. Fortier, Marlène Fuselier, Camille Granger Joly de Boissel, Philippine Chatenet, David Doucet, Nicolas Tompkins, Stephen M. St-Pierre, Yves Mahal, Lara K. Klassen, John S. Quantifying Biomolecular Interactions Using Slow Mixing Mode (SLOMO) Nanoflow ESI-MS |
title | Quantifying Biomolecular Interactions Using Slow Mixing
Mode (SLOMO) Nanoflow ESI-MS |
title_full | Quantifying Biomolecular Interactions Using Slow Mixing
Mode (SLOMO) Nanoflow ESI-MS |
title_fullStr | Quantifying Biomolecular Interactions Using Slow Mixing
Mode (SLOMO) Nanoflow ESI-MS |
title_full_unstemmed | Quantifying Biomolecular Interactions Using Slow Mixing
Mode (SLOMO) Nanoflow ESI-MS |
title_short | Quantifying Biomolecular Interactions Using Slow Mixing
Mode (SLOMO) Nanoflow ESI-MS |
title_sort | quantifying biomolecular interactions using slow mixing
mode (slomo) nanoflow esi-ms |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9335916/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35912341 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.2c00215 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT buiduongt quantifyingbiomolecularinteractionsusingslowmixingmodeslomonanoflowesims AT lizhixiong quantifyingbiomolecularinteractionsusingslowmixingmodeslomonanoflowesims AT kitovpaveli quantifyingbiomolecularinteractionsusingslowmixingmodeslomonanoflowesims AT hanling quantifyingbiomolecularinteractionsusingslowmixingmodeslomonanoflowesims AT kitovaelenan quantifyingbiomolecularinteractionsusingslowmixingmodeslomonanoflowesims AT fortiermarlene quantifyingbiomolecularinteractionsusingslowmixingmodeslomonanoflowesims AT fuseliercamille quantifyingbiomolecularinteractionsusingslowmixingmodeslomonanoflowesims AT grangerjolydeboisselphilippine quantifyingbiomolecularinteractionsusingslowmixingmodeslomonanoflowesims AT chatenetdavid quantifyingbiomolecularinteractionsusingslowmixingmodeslomonanoflowesims AT doucetnicolas quantifyingbiomolecularinteractionsusingslowmixingmodeslomonanoflowesims AT tompkinsstephenm quantifyingbiomolecularinteractionsusingslowmixingmodeslomonanoflowesims AT stpierreyves quantifyingbiomolecularinteractionsusingslowmixingmodeslomonanoflowesims AT mahallarak quantifyingbiomolecularinteractionsusingslowmixingmodeslomonanoflowesims AT klassenjohns quantifyingbiomolecularinteractionsusingslowmixingmodeslomonanoflowesims |