Cargando…
Assessing the Publicity and Reach of Peer-Led Online Medical Teaching: A Single-Event Evaluation
PURPOSE: The COVID-19 pandemic caused significant disruption to higher education, including medical studies. Online learner support became urgently necessary, and peer-support of learning was needed to supplement formal teaching. This study evaluates the impact and delivery media of OSCEazy, a stude...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9348631/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35937188 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S368218 |
_version_ | 1784761954542288896 |
---|---|
author | Mukhopadhyay, Srinjay Baskaran, Ravanth Peramuna Gamage, Movin Dalavaye, Nishaanth Ng, Wing Sum Vincent Srinivasan, Sripradha Ganesananthan, Sashiananthan Rutherford, Stephen |
author_facet | Mukhopadhyay, Srinjay Baskaran, Ravanth Peramuna Gamage, Movin Dalavaye, Nishaanth Ng, Wing Sum Vincent Srinivasan, Sripradha Ganesananthan, Sashiananthan Rutherford, Stephen |
author_sort | Mukhopadhyay, Srinjay |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The COVID-19 pandemic caused significant disruption to higher education, including medical studies. Online learner support became urgently necessary, and peer-support of learning was needed to supplement formal teaching. This study evaluates the impact and delivery media of OSCEazy, a student-led initiative supporting formal teaching across institutional and national boundaries. METHODS: A survey was created on Google Forms and disseminated via the Zoom chat function to all the participants at the end of our event titled, “The Cardiology Station”. RESULTS: A large proportion (99.5%) of the students have a Facebook account and (98.7%) use it to keep track of medical events (p=0.45 for comparison). However, a very small proportion of use their other social media to keep up with medical events (p<0.0001 for comparison). CONCLUSION: It is evident from our results, that most of our participants used Facebook to keep track of medical events. The use of their other social media platforms (Instagram, etc) to keep track of medical events was limited. Thus, it is important for any organisation, such as ours, who conduct online events to evaluate which platform is most suitable for them to use to publicise their events. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9348631 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93486312022-08-04 Assessing the Publicity and Reach of Peer-Led Online Medical Teaching: A Single-Event Evaluation Mukhopadhyay, Srinjay Baskaran, Ravanth Peramuna Gamage, Movin Dalavaye, Nishaanth Ng, Wing Sum Vincent Srinivasan, Sripradha Ganesananthan, Sashiananthan Rutherford, Stephen Adv Med Educ Pract Original Research PURPOSE: The COVID-19 pandemic caused significant disruption to higher education, including medical studies. Online learner support became urgently necessary, and peer-support of learning was needed to supplement formal teaching. This study evaluates the impact and delivery media of OSCEazy, a student-led initiative supporting formal teaching across institutional and national boundaries. METHODS: A survey was created on Google Forms and disseminated via the Zoom chat function to all the participants at the end of our event titled, “The Cardiology Station”. RESULTS: A large proportion (99.5%) of the students have a Facebook account and (98.7%) use it to keep track of medical events (p=0.45 for comparison). However, a very small proportion of use their other social media to keep up with medical events (p<0.0001 for comparison). CONCLUSION: It is evident from our results, that most of our participants used Facebook to keep track of medical events. The use of their other social media platforms (Instagram, etc) to keep track of medical events was limited. Thus, it is important for any organisation, such as ours, who conduct online events to evaluate which platform is most suitable for them to use to publicise their events. Dove 2022-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9348631/ /pubmed/35937188 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S368218 Text en © 2022 Mukhopadhyay et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Mukhopadhyay, Srinjay Baskaran, Ravanth Peramuna Gamage, Movin Dalavaye, Nishaanth Ng, Wing Sum Vincent Srinivasan, Sripradha Ganesananthan, Sashiananthan Rutherford, Stephen Assessing the Publicity and Reach of Peer-Led Online Medical Teaching: A Single-Event Evaluation |
title | Assessing the Publicity and Reach of Peer-Led Online Medical Teaching: A Single-Event Evaluation |
title_full | Assessing the Publicity and Reach of Peer-Led Online Medical Teaching: A Single-Event Evaluation |
title_fullStr | Assessing the Publicity and Reach of Peer-Led Online Medical Teaching: A Single-Event Evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessing the Publicity and Reach of Peer-Led Online Medical Teaching: A Single-Event Evaluation |
title_short | Assessing the Publicity and Reach of Peer-Led Online Medical Teaching: A Single-Event Evaluation |
title_sort | assessing the publicity and reach of peer-led online medical teaching: a single-event evaluation |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9348631/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35937188 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S368218 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mukhopadhyaysrinjay assessingthepublicityandreachofpeerledonlinemedicalteachingasingleeventevaluation AT baskaranravanth assessingthepublicityandreachofpeerledonlinemedicalteachingasingleeventevaluation AT peramunagamagemovin assessingthepublicityandreachofpeerledonlinemedicalteachingasingleeventevaluation AT dalavayenishaanth assessingthepublicityandreachofpeerledonlinemedicalteachingasingleeventevaluation AT ngwingsumvincent assessingthepublicityandreachofpeerledonlinemedicalteachingasingleeventevaluation AT srinivasansripradha assessingthepublicityandreachofpeerledonlinemedicalteachingasingleeventevaluation AT ganesananthansashiananthan assessingthepublicityandreachofpeerledonlinemedicalteachingasingleeventevaluation AT rutherfordstephen assessingthepublicityandreachofpeerledonlinemedicalteachingasingleeventevaluation |