Cargando…

Assessing the Publicity and Reach of Peer-Led Online Medical Teaching: A Single-Event Evaluation

PURPOSE: The COVID-19 pandemic caused significant disruption to higher education, including medical studies. Online learner support became urgently necessary, and peer-support of learning was needed to supplement formal teaching. This study evaluates the impact and delivery media of OSCEazy, a stude...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mukhopadhyay, Srinjay, Baskaran, Ravanth, Peramuna Gamage, Movin, Dalavaye, Nishaanth, Ng, Wing Sum Vincent, Srinivasan, Sripradha, Ganesananthan, Sashiananthan, Rutherford, Stephen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9348631/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35937188
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S368218
_version_ 1784761954542288896
author Mukhopadhyay, Srinjay
Baskaran, Ravanth
Peramuna Gamage, Movin
Dalavaye, Nishaanth
Ng, Wing Sum Vincent
Srinivasan, Sripradha
Ganesananthan, Sashiananthan
Rutherford, Stephen
author_facet Mukhopadhyay, Srinjay
Baskaran, Ravanth
Peramuna Gamage, Movin
Dalavaye, Nishaanth
Ng, Wing Sum Vincent
Srinivasan, Sripradha
Ganesananthan, Sashiananthan
Rutherford, Stephen
author_sort Mukhopadhyay, Srinjay
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The COVID-19 pandemic caused significant disruption to higher education, including medical studies. Online learner support became urgently necessary, and peer-support of learning was needed to supplement formal teaching. This study evaluates the impact and delivery media of OSCEazy, a student-led initiative supporting formal teaching across institutional and national boundaries. METHODS: A survey was created on Google Forms and disseminated via the Zoom chat function to all the participants at the end of our event titled, “The Cardiology Station”. RESULTS: A large proportion (99.5%) of the students have a Facebook account and (98.7%) use it to keep track of medical events (p=0.45 for comparison). However, a very small proportion of use their other social media to keep up with medical events (p<0.0001 for comparison). CONCLUSION: It is evident from our results, that most of our participants used Facebook to keep track of medical events. The use of their other social media platforms (Instagram, etc) to keep track of medical events was limited. Thus, it is important for any organisation, such as ours, who conduct online events to evaluate which platform is most suitable for them to use to publicise their events.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9348631
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93486312022-08-04 Assessing the Publicity and Reach of Peer-Led Online Medical Teaching: A Single-Event Evaluation Mukhopadhyay, Srinjay Baskaran, Ravanth Peramuna Gamage, Movin Dalavaye, Nishaanth Ng, Wing Sum Vincent Srinivasan, Sripradha Ganesananthan, Sashiananthan Rutherford, Stephen Adv Med Educ Pract Original Research PURPOSE: The COVID-19 pandemic caused significant disruption to higher education, including medical studies. Online learner support became urgently necessary, and peer-support of learning was needed to supplement formal teaching. This study evaluates the impact and delivery media of OSCEazy, a student-led initiative supporting formal teaching across institutional and national boundaries. METHODS: A survey was created on Google Forms and disseminated via the Zoom chat function to all the participants at the end of our event titled, “The Cardiology Station”. RESULTS: A large proportion (99.5%) of the students have a Facebook account and (98.7%) use it to keep track of medical events (p=0.45 for comparison). However, a very small proportion of use their other social media to keep up with medical events (p<0.0001 for comparison). CONCLUSION: It is evident from our results, that most of our participants used Facebook to keep track of medical events. The use of their other social media platforms (Instagram, etc) to keep track of medical events was limited. Thus, it is important for any organisation, such as ours, who conduct online events to evaluate which platform is most suitable for them to use to publicise their events. Dove 2022-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9348631/ /pubmed/35937188 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S368218 Text en © 2022 Mukhopadhyay et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Mukhopadhyay, Srinjay
Baskaran, Ravanth
Peramuna Gamage, Movin
Dalavaye, Nishaanth
Ng, Wing Sum Vincent
Srinivasan, Sripradha
Ganesananthan, Sashiananthan
Rutherford, Stephen
Assessing the Publicity and Reach of Peer-Led Online Medical Teaching: A Single-Event Evaluation
title Assessing the Publicity and Reach of Peer-Led Online Medical Teaching: A Single-Event Evaluation
title_full Assessing the Publicity and Reach of Peer-Led Online Medical Teaching: A Single-Event Evaluation
title_fullStr Assessing the Publicity and Reach of Peer-Led Online Medical Teaching: A Single-Event Evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the Publicity and Reach of Peer-Led Online Medical Teaching: A Single-Event Evaluation
title_short Assessing the Publicity and Reach of Peer-Led Online Medical Teaching: A Single-Event Evaluation
title_sort assessing the publicity and reach of peer-led online medical teaching: a single-event evaluation
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9348631/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35937188
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S368218
work_keys_str_mv AT mukhopadhyaysrinjay assessingthepublicityandreachofpeerledonlinemedicalteachingasingleeventevaluation
AT baskaranravanth assessingthepublicityandreachofpeerledonlinemedicalteachingasingleeventevaluation
AT peramunagamagemovin assessingthepublicityandreachofpeerledonlinemedicalteachingasingleeventevaluation
AT dalavayenishaanth assessingthepublicityandreachofpeerledonlinemedicalteachingasingleeventevaluation
AT ngwingsumvincent assessingthepublicityandreachofpeerledonlinemedicalteachingasingleeventevaluation
AT srinivasansripradha assessingthepublicityandreachofpeerledonlinemedicalteachingasingleeventevaluation
AT ganesananthansashiananthan assessingthepublicityandreachofpeerledonlinemedicalteachingasingleeventevaluation
AT rutherfordstephen assessingthepublicityandreachofpeerledonlinemedicalteachingasingleeventevaluation