Cargando…
Online dermatology curriculum experiences among US dermatology residents and faculty
Many dermatology residency programs adapted to the COVID-19 pandemic by transitioning to online teaching methods. This may impact the quality of education and the satisfaction of residents. Dermatology faculty and residents nationwide were surveyed regarding their experiences with the novel online c...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9357933/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35952855 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clindermatol.2022.08.002 |
_version_ | 1784763818687070208 |
---|---|
author | Nguyen, Quoc-Bao D. Starling, Caroline T. Baig, Imran T. Koshelev, Misha V. Nelson, Kelly C. |
author_facet | Nguyen, Quoc-Bao D. Starling, Caroline T. Baig, Imran T. Koshelev, Misha V. Nelson, Kelly C. |
author_sort | Nguyen, Quoc-Bao D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Many dermatology residency programs adapted to the COVID-19 pandemic by transitioning to online teaching methods. This may impact the quality of education and the satisfaction of residents. Dermatology faculty and residents nationwide were surveyed regarding their experiences with the novel online curricula. A total of 65 individuals representing at least 20 ACGME-accredited dermatology programs responded. Many programs implemented a predominantly online curriculum (78%). Most participants reported that both clinical dermatology and dermatopathology were online during the pandemic's peak (90%). Among those who had experienced a live curriculum prior to the pandemic, 49% reported that a virtual curriculum had similar effectiveness, whereas 36% deemed it less effective. Open-ended questions suggested that disadvantages of a virtual curricula included too many distractions, lack of human features, and less spontaneous feedback. They also suggested advantages to an online curriculum included flexibility and more opportunities to hear from guest speakers. Dissatisfaction before the curriculum change was the same as after (7%), suggesting that the educational experience was not worsened. Failing to adjust the curriculum to residents’ needs can contribute to lower satisfaction and inadequate education. The variation of responses signifies the importance of seeking sufficient feedback from residents to meet their educational needs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9357933 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93579332022-08-09 Online dermatology curriculum experiences among US dermatology residents and faculty Nguyen, Quoc-Bao D. Starling, Caroline T. Baig, Imran T. Koshelev, Misha V. Nelson, Kelly C. Clin Dermatol Graduate Medical Education Rounds Many dermatology residency programs adapted to the COVID-19 pandemic by transitioning to online teaching methods. This may impact the quality of education and the satisfaction of residents. Dermatology faculty and residents nationwide were surveyed regarding their experiences with the novel online curricula. A total of 65 individuals representing at least 20 ACGME-accredited dermatology programs responded. Many programs implemented a predominantly online curriculum (78%). Most participants reported that both clinical dermatology and dermatopathology were online during the pandemic's peak (90%). Among those who had experienced a live curriculum prior to the pandemic, 49% reported that a virtual curriculum had similar effectiveness, whereas 36% deemed it less effective. Open-ended questions suggested that disadvantages of a virtual curricula included too many distractions, lack of human features, and less spontaneous feedback. They also suggested advantages to an online curriculum included flexibility and more opportunities to hear from guest speakers. Dissatisfaction before the curriculum change was the same as after (7%), suggesting that the educational experience was not worsened. Failing to adjust the curriculum to residents’ needs can contribute to lower satisfaction and inadequate education. The variation of responses signifies the importance of seeking sufficient feedback from residents to meet their educational needs. Elsevier Inc. 2022 2022-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9357933/ /pubmed/35952855 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clindermatol.2022.08.002 Text en © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Graduate Medical Education Rounds Nguyen, Quoc-Bao D. Starling, Caroline T. Baig, Imran T. Koshelev, Misha V. Nelson, Kelly C. Online dermatology curriculum experiences among US dermatology residents and faculty |
title | Online dermatology curriculum experiences among US dermatology residents and faculty |
title_full | Online dermatology curriculum experiences among US dermatology residents and faculty |
title_fullStr | Online dermatology curriculum experiences among US dermatology residents and faculty |
title_full_unstemmed | Online dermatology curriculum experiences among US dermatology residents and faculty |
title_short | Online dermatology curriculum experiences among US dermatology residents and faculty |
title_sort | online dermatology curriculum experiences among us dermatology residents and faculty |
topic | Graduate Medical Education Rounds |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9357933/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35952855 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clindermatol.2022.08.002 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nguyenquocbaod onlinedermatologycurriculumexperiencesamongusdermatologyresidentsandfaculty AT starlingcarolinet onlinedermatologycurriculumexperiencesamongusdermatologyresidentsandfaculty AT baigimrant onlinedermatologycurriculumexperiencesamongusdermatologyresidentsandfaculty AT koshelevmishav onlinedermatologycurriculumexperiencesamongusdermatologyresidentsandfaculty AT nelsonkellyc onlinedermatologycurriculumexperiencesamongusdermatologyresidentsandfaculty |