Cargando…
Large protein complex interfaces have evolved to promote cotranslational assembly
Assembly pathways of protein complexes should be precise and efficient to minimise misfolding and unwanted interactions with other proteins in the cell. One way to achieve this efficiency is by seeding assembly pathways during translation via the cotranslational assembly of subunits. While recent ev...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9365393/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35899946 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.79602 |
_version_ | 1784765335465885696 |
---|---|
author | Badonyi, Mihaly Marsh, Joseph A |
author_facet | Badonyi, Mihaly Marsh, Joseph A |
author_sort | Badonyi, Mihaly |
collection | PubMed |
description | Assembly pathways of protein complexes should be precise and efficient to minimise misfolding and unwanted interactions with other proteins in the cell. One way to achieve this efficiency is by seeding assembly pathways during translation via the cotranslational assembly of subunits. While recent evidence suggests that such cotranslational assembly is widespread, little is known about the properties of protein complexes associated with the phenomenon. Here, using a combination of proteome-specific protein complex structures and publicly available ribosome profiling data, we show that cotranslational assembly is particularly common between subunits that form large intermolecular interfaces. To test whether large interfaces have evolved to promote cotranslational assembly, as opposed to cotranslational assembly being a non-adaptive consequence of large interfaces, we compared the sizes of first and last translated interfaces of heteromeric subunits in bacterial, yeast, and human complexes. When considering all together, we observe the N-terminal interface to be larger than the C-terminal interface 54% of the time, increasing to 64% when we exclude subunits with only small interfaces, which are unlikely to cotranslationally assemble. This strongly suggests that large interfaces have evolved as a means to maximise the chance of successful cotranslational subunit binding. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9365393 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93653932022-08-11 Large protein complex interfaces have evolved to promote cotranslational assembly Badonyi, Mihaly Marsh, Joseph A eLife Computational and Systems Biology Assembly pathways of protein complexes should be precise and efficient to minimise misfolding and unwanted interactions with other proteins in the cell. One way to achieve this efficiency is by seeding assembly pathways during translation via the cotranslational assembly of subunits. While recent evidence suggests that such cotranslational assembly is widespread, little is known about the properties of protein complexes associated with the phenomenon. Here, using a combination of proteome-specific protein complex structures and publicly available ribosome profiling data, we show that cotranslational assembly is particularly common between subunits that form large intermolecular interfaces. To test whether large interfaces have evolved to promote cotranslational assembly, as opposed to cotranslational assembly being a non-adaptive consequence of large interfaces, we compared the sizes of first and last translated interfaces of heteromeric subunits in bacterial, yeast, and human complexes. When considering all together, we observe the N-terminal interface to be larger than the C-terminal interface 54% of the time, increasing to 64% when we exclude subunits with only small interfaces, which are unlikely to cotranslationally assemble. This strongly suggests that large interfaces have evolved as a means to maximise the chance of successful cotranslational subunit binding. eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd 2022-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9365393/ /pubmed/35899946 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.79602 Text en © 2022, Badonyi and Marsh https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Computational and Systems Biology Badonyi, Mihaly Marsh, Joseph A Large protein complex interfaces have evolved to promote cotranslational assembly |
title | Large protein complex interfaces have evolved to promote cotranslational assembly |
title_full | Large protein complex interfaces have evolved to promote cotranslational assembly |
title_fullStr | Large protein complex interfaces have evolved to promote cotranslational assembly |
title_full_unstemmed | Large protein complex interfaces have evolved to promote cotranslational assembly |
title_short | Large protein complex interfaces have evolved to promote cotranslational assembly |
title_sort | large protein complex interfaces have evolved to promote cotranslational assembly |
topic | Computational and Systems Biology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9365393/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35899946 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.79602 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT badonyimihaly largeproteincomplexinterfaceshaveevolvedtopromotecotranslationalassembly AT marshjosepha largeproteincomplexinterfaceshaveevolvedtopromotecotranslationalassembly |