Cargando…
Asynchronous Online Instruction Leads to Learning Gaps When Compared to a Flipped Classroom
With the gradual shift to online education models that has taken place in recent decades, research has sought to understand the nuances of student performance in an online model in comparison to more traditional in-person modalities. However, the effects of instructional modality have been difficult...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9366838/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35971508 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10956-022-09988-7 |
_version_ | 1784765657186828288 |
---|---|
author | Jensen, Jamie Smith, Clara M. Bowers, Robert Kaloi, Mahealani Ogden, T. Heath Parry, Kirkham A. Payne, Joshua S. Fife, Porter Holt, Emily |
author_facet | Jensen, Jamie Smith, Clara M. Bowers, Robert Kaloi, Mahealani Ogden, T. Heath Parry, Kirkham A. Payne, Joshua S. Fife, Porter Holt, Emily |
author_sort | Jensen, Jamie |
collection | PubMed |
description | With the gradual shift to online education models that has taken place in recent decades, research has sought to understand the nuances of student performance in an online model in comparison to more traditional in-person modalities. However, the effects of instructional modality have been difficult to determine given the many variables that exist in course design between these methods. In this study, we attempt to determine the efficacy of asynchronous online instruction by comparing two nearly equivalent courses. The first course was a flipped classroom, a recent and well-studied hybrid model of instruction. The second was an asynchronous fully online course that contained all the same instructional elements as the in-person course but lacked any student or instructor interaction. Student performance was tracked at both a highly-selective private institution and an open-enrollment public institution. Results show that students’ performance drops in an asynchronous online course compared to an equivalent in-person experience. Several potential hypotheses are put forth to explain a change in performance that can potentially shape the design of online instruction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9366838 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93668382022-08-11 Asynchronous Online Instruction Leads to Learning Gaps When Compared to a Flipped Classroom Jensen, Jamie Smith, Clara M. Bowers, Robert Kaloi, Mahealani Ogden, T. Heath Parry, Kirkham A. Payne, Joshua S. Fife, Porter Holt, Emily J Sci Educ Technol Article With the gradual shift to online education models that has taken place in recent decades, research has sought to understand the nuances of student performance in an online model in comparison to more traditional in-person modalities. However, the effects of instructional modality have been difficult to determine given the many variables that exist in course design between these methods. In this study, we attempt to determine the efficacy of asynchronous online instruction by comparing two nearly equivalent courses. The first course was a flipped classroom, a recent and well-studied hybrid model of instruction. The second was an asynchronous fully online course that contained all the same instructional elements as the in-person course but lacked any student or instructor interaction. Student performance was tracked at both a highly-selective private institution and an open-enrollment public institution. Results show that students’ performance drops in an asynchronous online course compared to an equivalent in-person experience. Several potential hypotheses are put forth to explain a change in performance that can potentially shape the design of online instruction. Springer Netherlands 2022-08-11 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9366838/ /pubmed/35971508 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10956-022-09988-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Jensen, Jamie Smith, Clara M. Bowers, Robert Kaloi, Mahealani Ogden, T. Heath Parry, Kirkham A. Payne, Joshua S. Fife, Porter Holt, Emily Asynchronous Online Instruction Leads to Learning Gaps When Compared to a Flipped Classroom |
title | Asynchronous Online Instruction Leads to Learning Gaps When Compared to a Flipped Classroom |
title_full | Asynchronous Online Instruction Leads to Learning Gaps When Compared to a Flipped Classroom |
title_fullStr | Asynchronous Online Instruction Leads to Learning Gaps When Compared to a Flipped Classroom |
title_full_unstemmed | Asynchronous Online Instruction Leads to Learning Gaps When Compared to a Flipped Classroom |
title_short | Asynchronous Online Instruction Leads to Learning Gaps When Compared to a Flipped Classroom |
title_sort | asynchronous online instruction leads to learning gaps when compared to a flipped classroom |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9366838/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35971508 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10956-022-09988-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jensenjamie asynchronousonlineinstructionleadstolearninggapswhencomparedtoaflippedclassroom AT smithclaram asynchronousonlineinstructionleadstolearninggapswhencomparedtoaflippedclassroom AT bowersrobert asynchronousonlineinstructionleadstolearninggapswhencomparedtoaflippedclassroom AT kaloimahealani asynchronousonlineinstructionleadstolearninggapswhencomparedtoaflippedclassroom AT ogdentheath asynchronousonlineinstructionleadstolearninggapswhencomparedtoaflippedclassroom AT parrykirkhama asynchronousonlineinstructionleadstolearninggapswhencomparedtoaflippedclassroom AT paynejoshuas asynchronousonlineinstructionleadstolearninggapswhencomparedtoaflippedclassroom AT fifeporter asynchronousonlineinstructionleadstolearninggapswhencomparedtoaflippedclassroom AT holtemily asynchronousonlineinstructionleadstolearninggapswhencomparedtoaflippedclassroom |