Cargando…
Systematic comparison of CRISPR-based transcriptional activators uncovers gene-regulatory features of enhancer–promoter interactions
Nuclease-inactivated CRISPR/Cas-based (dCas-based) systems have emerged as powerful technologies to synthetically reshape the human epigenome and gene expression. Despite the increasing adoption of these platforms, their relative potencies and mechanistic differences are incompletely characterized,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9371918/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35849129 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkac582 |
_version_ | 1784767267372793856 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Kaiyuan Escobar, Mario Li, Jing Mahata, Barun Goell, Jacob Shah, Spencer Cluck, Madeleine Hilton, Isaac B |
author_facet | Wang, Kaiyuan Escobar, Mario Li, Jing Mahata, Barun Goell, Jacob Shah, Spencer Cluck, Madeleine Hilton, Isaac B |
author_sort | Wang, Kaiyuan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Nuclease-inactivated CRISPR/Cas-based (dCas-based) systems have emerged as powerful technologies to synthetically reshape the human epigenome and gene expression. Despite the increasing adoption of these platforms, their relative potencies and mechanistic differences are incompletely characterized, particularly at human enhancer–promoter pairs. Here, we systematically compared the most widely adopted dCas9-based transcriptional activators, as well as an activator consisting of dCas9 fused to the catalytic core of the human CBP protein, at human enhancer–promoter pairs. We find that these platforms display variable relative expression levels in different human cell types and that their transactivation efficacies vary based upon the effector domain, effector recruitment architecture, targeted locus and cell type. We also show that each dCas9-based activator can induce the production of enhancer RNAs (eRNAs) and that this eRNA induction is positively correlated with downstream mRNA expression from a cognate promoter. Additionally, we use dCas9-based activators to demonstrate that an intrinsic transcriptional and epigenetic reciprocity can exist between human enhancers and promoters and that enhancer-mediated tracking and engagement of a downstream promoter can be synthetically driven by targeting dCas9-based transcriptional activators to an enhancer. Collectively, our study provides new insights into the enhancer-mediated control of human gene expression and the use of dCas9-based activators. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9371918 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93719182022-08-12 Systematic comparison of CRISPR-based transcriptional activators uncovers gene-regulatory features of enhancer–promoter interactions Wang, Kaiyuan Escobar, Mario Li, Jing Mahata, Barun Goell, Jacob Shah, Spencer Cluck, Madeleine Hilton, Isaac B Nucleic Acids Res Gene regulation, Chromatin and Epigenetics Nuclease-inactivated CRISPR/Cas-based (dCas-based) systems have emerged as powerful technologies to synthetically reshape the human epigenome and gene expression. Despite the increasing adoption of these platforms, their relative potencies and mechanistic differences are incompletely characterized, particularly at human enhancer–promoter pairs. Here, we systematically compared the most widely adopted dCas9-based transcriptional activators, as well as an activator consisting of dCas9 fused to the catalytic core of the human CBP protein, at human enhancer–promoter pairs. We find that these platforms display variable relative expression levels in different human cell types and that their transactivation efficacies vary based upon the effector domain, effector recruitment architecture, targeted locus and cell type. We also show that each dCas9-based activator can induce the production of enhancer RNAs (eRNAs) and that this eRNA induction is positively correlated with downstream mRNA expression from a cognate promoter. Additionally, we use dCas9-based activators to demonstrate that an intrinsic transcriptional and epigenetic reciprocity can exist between human enhancers and promoters and that enhancer-mediated tracking and engagement of a downstream promoter can be synthetically driven by targeting dCas9-based transcriptional activators to an enhancer. Collectively, our study provides new insights into the enhancer-mediated control of human gene expression and the use of dCas9-based activators. Oxford University Press 2022-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9371918/ /pubmed/35849129 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkac582 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Gene regulation, Chromatin and Epigenetics Wang, Kaiyuan Escobar, Mario Li, Jing Mahata, Barun Goell, Jacob Shah, Spencer Cluck, Madeleine Hilton, Isaac B Systematic comparison of CRISPR-based transcriptional activators uncovers gene-regulatory features of enhancer–promoter interactions |
title | Systematic comparison of CRISPR-based transcriptional activators uncovers gene-regulatory features of enhancer–promoter interactions |
title_full | Systematic comparison of CRISPR-based transcriptional activators uncovers gene-regulatory features of enhancer–promoter interactions |
title_fullStr | Systematic comparison of CRISPR-based transcriptional activators uncovers gene-regulatory features of enhancer–promoter interactions |
title_full_unstemmed | Systematic comparison of CRISPR-based transcriptional activators uncovers gene-regulatory features of enhancer–promoter interactions |
title_short | Systematic comparison of CRISPR-based transcriptional activators uncovers gene-regulatory features of enhancer–promoter interactions |
title_sort | systematic comparison of crispr-based transcriptional activators uncovers gene-regulatory features of enhancer–promoter interactions |
topic | Gene regulation, Chromatin and Epigenetics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9371918/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35849129 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkac582 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangkaiyuan systematiccomparisonofcrisprbasedtranscriptionalactivatorsuncoversgeneregulatoryfeaturesofenhancerpromoterinteractions AT escobarmario systematiccomparisonofcrisprbasedtranscriptionalactivatorsuncoversgeneregulatoryfeaturesofenhancerpromoterinteractions AT lijing systematiccomparisonofcrisprbasedtranscriptionalactivatorsuncoversgeneregulatoryfeaturesofenhancerpromoterinteractions AT mahatabarun systematiccomparisonofcrisprbasedtranscriptionalactivatorsuncoversgeneregulatoryfeaturesofenhancerpromoterinteractions AT goelljacob systematiccomparisonofcrisprbasedtranscriptionalactivatorsuncoversgeneregulatoryfeaturesofenhancerpromoterinteractions AT shahspencer systematiccomparisonofcrisprbasedtranscriptionalactivatorsuncoversgeneregulatoryfeaturesofenhancerpromoterinteractions AT cluckmadeleine systematiccomparisonofcrisprbasedtranscriptionalactivatorsuncoversgeneregulatoryfeaturesofenhancerpromoterinteractions AT hiltonisaacb systematiccomparisonofcrisprbasedtranscriptionalactivatorsuncoversgeneregulatoryfeaturesofenhancerpromoterinteractions |