Cargando…

Task Type and Discussion of Language Form in L2 Pair Interaction

This study investigated the effects of task type on L2 learners’ discussion of language form during collaborative dialogues. The tasks differed in their degree of input provision: argumentative writing, dictogloss, and text editing. All collaborative dialogues were recorded, transcribed verbatim, an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zabihi, Reza, Erfanitabar, Danial, Mehranirad, Mehdi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Nature Singapore 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9382622/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42321-022-00124-7
_version_ 1784769323242356736
author Zabihi, Reza
Erfanitabar, Danial
Mehranirad, Mehdi
author_facet Zabihi, Reza
Erfanitabar, Danial
Mehranirad, Mehdi
author_sort Zabihi, Reza
collection PubMed
description This study investigated the effects of task type on L2 learners’ discussion of language form during collaborative dialogues. The tasks differed in their degree of input provision: argumentative writing, dictogloss, and text editing. All collaborative dialogues were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed in terms of the frequency, type (lexical or grammatical), and outcome (correctly/incorrectly resolved or unresolved) of language-related episodes (LREs) produced during pair interactions. Results from a repeated measures ANOVA with post hoc comparisons showed that learners produced more LREs while doing the argumentative writing task than when they did the dictogloss task or the text-editing task. In addition, while learners significantly produced more lexical LREs while doing the argumentative writing task than when they performed either the dictogloss task or the text-editing task, the number of grammatical LREs produced in the text editing task was significantly higher than that produced during the completion of the other two tasks. Finally, learners significantly correctly resolved more LREs in the argumentative writing task than in the dictogloss task, but no significant difference was found either between the argumentative writing task and the text-editing task or between the text-editing task and the dictogloss task regarding the correct resolution of LREs. The effects of task type on the frequency of incorrectly resolved and unresolved LREs were also not significant.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9382622
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Nature Singapore
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93826222022-08-17 Task Type and Discussion of Language Form in L2 Pair Interaction Zabihi, Reza Erfanitabar, Danial Mehranirad, Mehdi English Teaching & Learning Original Paper This study investigated the effects of task type on L2 learners’ discussion of language form during collaborative dialogues. The tasks differed in their degree of input provision: argumentative writing, dictogloss, and text editing. All collaborative dialogues were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed in terms of the frequency, type (lexical or grammatical), and outcome (correctly/incorrectly resolved or unresolved) of language-related episodes (LREs) produced during pair interactions. Results from a repeated measures ANOVA with post hoc comparisons showed that learners produced more LREs while doing the argumentative writing task than when they did the dictogloss task or the text-editing task. In addition, while learners significantly produced more lexical LREs while doing the argumentative writing task than when they performed either the dictogloss task or the text-editing task, the number of grammatical LREs produced in the text editing task was significantly higher than that produced during the completion of the other two tasks. Finally, learners significantly correctly resolved more LREs in the argumentative writing task than in the dictogloss task, but no significant difference was found either between the argumentative writing task and the text-editing task or between the text-editing task and the dictogloss task regarding the correct resolution of LREs. The effects of task type on the frequency of incorrectly resolved and unresolved LREs were also not significant. Springer Nature Singapore 2022-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9382622/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42321-022-00124-7 Text en © The Author(s) under exclusive licence to National Taiwan Normal University 2022, Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Zabihi, Reza
Erfanitabar, Danial
Mehranirad, Mehdi
Task Type and Discussion of Language Form in L2 Pair Interaction
title Task Type and Discussion of Language Form in L2 Pair Interaction
title_full Task Type and Discussion of Language Form in L2 Pair Interaction
title_fullStr Task Type and Discussion of Language Form in L2 Pair Interaction
title_full_unstemmed Task Type and Discussion of Language Form in L2 Pair Interaction
title_short Task Type and Discussion of Language Form in L2 Pair Interaction
title_sort task type and discussion of language form in l2 pair interaction
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9382622/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42321-022-00124-7
work_keys_str_mv AT zabihireza tasktypeanddiscussionoflanguageforminl2pairinteraction
AT erfanitabardanial tasktypeanddiscussionoflanguageforminl2pairinteraction
AT mehraniradmehdi tasktypeanddiscussionoflanguageforminl2pairinteraction