Cargando…
Immune hyporeactivity to bacteria and multiple TLR-ligands, yet no response to checkpoint inhibition in patients just after meeting Sepsis-3 criteria
RATIONALE: The immune profile of sepsis patients is incompletely understood and hyperinflammation and hypoinflammation may occur concurrently or sequentially. Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) may counter hypoinflammation but effects are uncertain. We tested the reactivity of septic whole blood to...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9387870/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35981050 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273247 |
_version_ | 1784770098095980544 |
---|---|
author | Bick, Alexandra Buys, Willem Engler, Andrea Madel, Rabea Atia, Mazen Faro, Francesca Westendorf, Astrid M. Limmer, Andreas Buer, Jan Herbstreit, Frank Kirschning, Carsten J. Peters, Jürgen |
author_facet | Bick, Alexandra Buys, Willem Engler, Andrea Madel, Rabea Atia, Mazen Faro, Francesca Westendorf, Astrid M. Limmer, Andreas Buer, Jan Herbstreit, Frank Kirschning, Carsten J. Peters, Jürgen |
author_sort | Bick, Alexandra |
collection | PubMed |
description | RATIONALE: The immune profile of sepsis patients is incompletely understood and hyperinflammation and hypoinflammation may occur concurrently or sequentially. Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) may counter hypoinflammation but effects are uncertain. We tested the reactivity of septic whole blood to bacteria, Toll-like receptor (TLR) ligands and to ICI. METHODS: Whole blood assays of 61 patients’ samples within 24h of meeting sepsis-3 criteria and 12 age and sex-matched healthy volunteers. Measurements included pattern/danger-associated molecular pattern (P/DAMP), cytokine concentrations at baseline and in response to TLR 2, 4, and 7/8 ligands, heat-inactivated Staphylococcus aureus or Escherichia coli, E.coli lipopolysaccharide (LPS), concentration of soluble and cellular immune checkpoint molecules, and cytokine concentrations in response to ICI directed against programmed-death receptor 1 (PD1), PD1-ligand 1, or cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4, both in the absence and presence of LPS. MAIN RESULTS: In sepsis, concentrations of P/DAMPs and inflammatory cytokines were increased and the latter increased further upon incubation ex vivo. However, cytokine responses to TLR 2, 4, and 7/8 ligands, heat-inactivated S. aureus or E. coli, and E. coli LPS were all depressed. Depression of the response to LPS was associated with increased in-hospital mortality. Despite increased PD-1 expression on monocytes and T-cells, and monocyte CTLA-4 expression, however, addition of corresponding checkpoint inhibitors to assays failed to increase inflammatory cytokine concentrations in the absence and presence of LPS. CONCLUSION: Patients first meeting Sepsis-3 criteria reveal 1) depressed responses to multiple TLR-ligands, bacteria, and bacterial LPS, despite concomitant inflammation, but 2) no response to immune checkpoint inhibition. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9387870 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93878702022-08-19 Immune hyporeactivity to bacteria and multiple TLR-ligands, yet no response to checkpoint inhibition in patients just after meeting Sepsis-3 criteria Bick, Alexandra Buys, Willem Engler, Andrea Madel, Rabea Atia, Mazen Faro, Francesca Westendorf, Astrid M. Limmer, Andreas Buer, Jan Herbstreit, Frank Kirschning, Carsten J. Peters, Jürgen PLoS One Research Article RATIONALE: The immune profile of sepsis patients is incompletely understood and hyperinflammation and hypoinflammation may occur concurrently or sequentially. Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) may counter hypoinflammation but effects are uncertain. We tested the reactivity of septic whole blood to bacteria, Toll-like receptor (TLR) ligands and to ICI. METHODS: Whole blood assays of 61 patients’ samples within 24h of meeting sepsis-3 criteria and 12 age and sex-matched healthy volunteers. Measurements included pattern/danger-associated molecular pattern (P/DAMP), cytokine concentrations at baseline and in response to TLR 2, 4, and 7/8 ligands, heat-inactivated Staphylococcus aureus or Escherichia coli, E.coli lipopolysaccharide (LPS), concentration of soluble and cellular immune checkpoint molecules, and cytokine concentrations in response to ICI directed against programmed-death receptor 1 (PD1), PD1-ligand 1, or cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4, both in the absence and presence of LPS. MAIN RESULTS: In sepsis, concentrations of P/DAMPs and inflammatory cytokines were increased and the latter increased further upon incubation ex vivo. However, cytokine responses to TLR 2, 4, and 7/8 ligands, heat-inactivated S. aureus or E. coli, and E. coli LPS were all depressed. Depression of the response to LPS was associated with increased in-hospital mortality. Despite increased PD-1 expression on monocytes and T-cells, and monocyte CTLA-4 expression, however, addition of corresponding checkpoint inhibitors to assays failed to increase inflammatory cytokine concentrations in the absence and presence of LPS. CONCLUSION: Patients first meeting Sepsis-3 criteria reveal 1) depressed responses to multiple TLR-ligands, bacteria, and bacterial LPS, despite concomitant inflammation, but 2) no response to immune checkpoint inhibition. Public Library of Science 2022-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9387870/ /pubmed/35981050 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273247 Text en © 2022 Bick et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Bick, Alexandra Buys, Willem Engler, Andrea Madel, Rabea Atia, Mazen Faro, Francesca Westendorf, Astrid M. Limmer, Andreas Buer, Jan Herbstreit, Frank Kirschning, Carsten J. Peters, Jürgen Immune hyporeactivity to bacteria and multiple TLR-ligands, yet no response to checkpoint inhibition in patients just after meeting Sepsis-3 criteria |
title | Immune hyporeactivity to bacteria and multiple TLR-ligands, yet no response to checkpoint inhibition in patients just after meeting Sepsis-3 criteria |
title_full | Immune hyporeactivity to bacteria and multiple TLR-ligands, yet no response to checkpoint inhibition in patients just after meeting Sepsis-3 criteria |
title_fullStr | Immune hyporeactivity to bacteria and multiple TLR-ligands, yet no response to checkpoint inhibition in patients just after meeting Sepsis-3 criteria |
title_full_unstemmed | Immune hyporeactivity to bacteria and multiple TLR-ligands, yet no response to checkpoint inhibition in patients just after meeting Sepsis-3 criteria |
title_short | Immune hyporeactivity to bacteria and multiple TLR-ligands, yet no response to checkpoint inhibition in patients just after meeting Sepsis-3 criteria |
title_sort | immune hyporeactivity to bacteria and multiple tlr-ligands, yet no response to checkpoint inhibition in patients just after meeting sepsis-3 criteria |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9387870/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35981050 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273247 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bickalexandra immunehyporeactivitytobacteriaandmultipletlrligandsyetnoresponsetocheckpointinhibitioninpatientsjustaftermeetingsepsis3criteria AT buyswillem immunehyporeactivitytobacteriaandmultipletlrligandsyetnoresponsetocheckpointinhibitioninpatientsjustaftermeetingsepsis3criteria AT englerandrea immunehyporeactivitytobacteriaandmultipletlrligandsyetnoresponsetocheckpointinhibitioninpatientsjustaftermeetingsepsis3criteria AT madelrabea immunehyporeactivitytobacteriaandmultipletlrligandsyetnoresponsetocheckpointinhibitioninpatientsjustaftermeetingsepsis3criteria AT atiamazen immunehyporeactivitytobacteriaandmultipletlrligandsyetnoresponsetocheckpointinhibitioninpatientsjustaftermeetingsepsis3criteria AT farofrancesca immunehyporeactivitytobacteriaandmultipletlrligandsyetnoresponsetocheckpointinhibitioninpatientsjustaftermeetingsepsis3criteria AT westendorfastridm immunehyporeactivitytobacteriaandmultipletlrligandsyetnoresponsetocheckpointinhibitioninpatientsjustaftermeetingsepsis3criteria AT limmerandreas immunehyporeactivitytobacteriaandmultipletlrligandsyetnoresponsetocheckpointinhibitioninpatientsjustaftermeetingsepsis3criteria AT buerjan immunehyporeactivitytobacteriaandmultipletlrligandsyetnoresponsetocheckpointinhibitioninpatientsjustaftermeetingsepsis3criteria AT herbstreitfrank immunehyporeactivitytobacteriaandmultipletlrligandsyetnoresponsetocheckpointinhibitioninpatientsjustaftermeetingsepsis3criteria AT kirschningcarstenj immunehyporeactivitytobacteriaandmultipletlrligandsyetnoresponsetocheckpointinhibitioninpatientsjustaftermeetingsepsis3criteria AT petersjurgen immunehyporeactivitytobacteriaandmultipletlrligandsyetnoresponsetocheckpointinhibitioninpatientsjustaftermeetingsepsis3criteria |